People are being told that animals are beings who are sentient. BECAUSE THEY ARE WANTED DEAD.

 

 

 

 

 

People are being said that animals are beings who are sentient. First of all, it does allow them not to recognize the same for the plants (yes, sinner we(l)come in hell). Beware that we are told this just like machines. It is only an animal trait that one can recognize that an animal is an animal, just like it takes one to recognize that. I doubt is that people are so anxious to inform the ones that living in these godforsaken cities- though everyone flew the countryside as it has been killed, depleted, dramatically shrunken and tortured systematically.

 

So how come we do not focus on the extraordinary intelligence and skills animals have and that of course including what we cannot even possibly think.

Humans recognize to animals (for their own sanity, because on surface (surfact-surfeit), humans want to acknowledge what they can see on watching 5 seconds of another species, that they are feeling that they are communication, (pretending utility) that they are mimicking the average biologists would even dare? Are? to say).

 

BECAUSE THEY ARE WANTED DEAD, OR AT OUR SERVICE, IN RESERVES OR IN THE BIN, JUST BY EXTENSION EVERYTHING. OUR SOUL AND BEING.

 

Hear say, AS VAIN, as the void of vanity.

Vanity-fair.

 

 

TO DENY OTHER SPECIES INTELLIGENCE, SENSITIVITY, SENSIBILITY IS (EVERYTHING FROM CAPACITY WE DO NOT HAVE A CLUE ABOUT, THAT WE CANNOT EVEN START TO SENSE- OR MAKE SENSE OF- TO THEIR PROPENSITY SO ANIMALS SUCH AS PHILOSOPHY AND POLITICS BAITS AND DEBATES) FOR POTENTIAL SLAUGHETERS THE EQUIVALENT TO POINT TO THE HUMAN SPECIES AS BEING A BUNCH OF HOLOGRAMS, AND THEREFORE JUSTIFYING THE PREDATION EXERT ON THEIR FALSEHOOD AND/OR THEIR BEING LIFE IMITATION/PALE REPRODUCTION, THE SHADOWS IN FACT.

Let’s imagine that humans meet their technologically more potent predators’ species. To rob humans of their humanities, the robots or others, whatever the categories of the people operating the slaughters are in (or assimilated or viewed or understood as fulfilling or ticking); they for example to justify the slaughters or predation (exploitation in our lexicon) of humans to say, to theories, to divulgate and advertise and mediatize (in case they need to make sure their population this more or less embrace, and to disable dissent) that humans are mere, not more (meme nightmare) holograms.

Thus, they could manage entirely to justify humans’ feats, capabilities, shows of its existence, but what is left of it if they were treated as images only?