Category: unpunished crimes



WHO WOULD LIKE CHINA AND RUSSIA TO BECOME THEIR BIG BROTHE’S

China just going from undemocratic to dictatorial in on move or two.

and WHAT YOU MIGHT NOT HAVE UNDERSTOOD ABOUT CHINA CENSORSHIP, half of  the western content have been blocked from viewing, and note, now if you are caught (surfing google or many others, including all videos), it can mean prison.

 

WHAT YOU MIGHT NOT HAVE UNDERSTOOD ABOUT CHINA CENSORSHIP, IS THAT IT IS NOT INNER TO THE COUNTRY BUT BAN CHINESE FROM SAYING WHAT THEY THINK BUT NOT ONLY. THE IT GREAT WALL OF CHINA BANS THOUSANDS OF FOREIGN WEBSITES (AS HUGE AS GOOGLE, WIKIPEDIA, TWEETER, THE NEW-YORK TIME AND YOUTUBE, ALL BLOGS, AND ALL VIDEOS- AS IN VIDEO YOU CANNOT FISH FOR PARTICULAR LEXIC AND LINGUISTICS YOU WANT TO SEE DISAPPEAR).

 

THE NOVELTY IS THAT NOW YOU COULD GO TO PRISON TO TRY TO CIRCUMVENT THE CENSORS IN ORDER TO ACCES WHAT EUROPEANS OR AMERICANS CAN VIEW AND READ.

 

 

 

 

In fact, I have lived and worked in China, all Google and therefore Youtube are out of reach, and all videos as Chinese cannot cipher foreign videos for censoring them as content cannot be censored via automatic digital censoring websites using certain words (all foreign blogs are banned in China). I am very worried as people could, when I first came there, found free VPN online, enabling them to register their computer IP in another country and therefore circumvent censorship. Six months upon my arrival, you still could use a VPN but for money, the same amount of money you need to have an unlimited internet connexion (huge amount for a working class Chinese citizens). Personally, I decided not to take one, and ended up working hours; wasted as I could not access sites still listed in search engines, even ‘English teaching site’, TFL sites, educational sites, etc…

Even more worrying now the Chinese governments officially said that they can punish the use of VPN (only way to access foreign blogs, youtube, all videos, etc !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!–) with computers ‘use bans on individual charge with browsing forbidden foreign internet material or by imprisoning them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C.ET: AS A FURTHER NOTE: these past few weeks the news could not dry on how Shi, the Chinese president became the one figure of the party, comparing him to Marx and Mao.

But 2 years ago, Shi became at the same time as president, chief of the army, while treating their neighbors of land grabs- not talking of the Tibet that the English has given to them when they leave the colonial.

 

 

If today, Brexit might make a point of being royal, China gets along in clothes imperial.

And now with America, that elected the ones that said ‘America first’ perhaps wanting war or cooperation, go on with how American have been socially neglected, just maybe to appeal for some sort of economic or else conflict, thinking of how WW1 and WW2, permitted it to reach the top through being a creditor not a loaner like nowadays.

Mayo is the vote in Chinese that means null- the opposition dictatorship will have in their midst.

 

 

 

 

China crackdown: VPN vendor gets prison

Nine months for letting punters bypass Great Firewall

By Richard Chirgwin 5 Sep 2017 at 03:07

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/09/05/china_crackdown_vpn_vendor_gets_prison/

 

After China’s crackdown, now Russia is banning VPNs too

https://qz.com/1041927/after-chinas-crackdown-now-russia-is-banning-vpns-too/

 

China just made VPNs illegal

The Great Firewall just got more impenetrable.

https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/23/china-vpn-illegal-internet-censorship-government-approval/

 

 

 

In Putin’s Russia, the hollowed-out media mirrors the state

Alexey Kovalev

The Russian government has spent years consolidating its control of the media. Now it sees reporters as public servants first and journalists second – if at all

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/24/putin-russia-media-state-government-control

 

C.ET: mirroring how in the west, one could spend one’s life listening to media without knowing anything of what is really happening.

 

 

 

https://medium.com/project-syndicate/chinas-new-emperor-151d14161e6b

China’s New Emperor

In another country, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s concentration of power might trigger accusations of latter-day totalitarianism.

By Chris Patten

Zhou Enlai, Mao’s dutiful number two, is said to have responded to a question about the lessons of the French Revolution by saying that it was too soon to tell.

https://medium.com/project-syndicate/chinas-new-emperor-151d14161e6b

 

 

Table of high-ranking websites blocked in mainland China[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Websites_blocked_in_China

 

C.ET: Here wiki is very wrong, it is true for Facebook and google, but BBC is not under censorship

 

 

Internet censorship in Russia – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Russia

Internet censorship in the Russian Federation is enforced on the basis of several laws and ….. Instances of censorship[edit]. A number of websites maintain lists of websites currently blocked in Russia, based on different sources of information.

Agencies · ‎History · ‎Monitoring · ‎Internet blacklist

How the Russian Internet Censor Banned Itself – Bloomberg

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/…/how-the-russian-internet-censor-banned-itself

13 Jun 2017 – Censoring the internet is as difficult as it is futile, and Russian internet users … Instead, internet providers are required to block the sites on the …

Russia is trying to copy China’s internet censorship.

http://www.slate.com/articles/…/russia_is_trying_to_copy_china_s_internet_censorship.html

4 Apr 2017 – I quickly found that Russia and China had very different attitudes toward the web. The Great Firewall of China blocked overseas sites such as …

Google removed from list of banned sites in Russia that led to its …

https://www.rt.com/business/393593-google-russia-ban-lifted/

22 Jun 2017 – Russian regulator Roskomnadzor has removed Google Russia from a list of prohibited information resources in the country.

Russia follows China in VPN clampdown, raising censorship concerns

https://www.cnbc.com/…/russia-follows-china-in-vpn-clampdown-raising-censorship-…

31 Jul 2017 – Russia follows China in tightening internet restrictions, raising fresh … Various websitesare banned under Russia’s internet restriction and child …

You visited this page on 03/10/17.

How to Unblock Blocked Apps and Websites from Russia

https://www.hotspotshield.com/…/how-to-unblock-blocked-apps-and-websites-from-r…

Whether you live in Russia or not, knowing what is happening with your favorite apps, as well as how to unblock those if need arises, gives you more control.

Russia’s secret internet blacklist | Media | The Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com › Media › Press freedom

6 Nov 2012 – The Russian state has created a blacklist of blocked websites and internet addresses – but the list itself is secret. It was drawn up following the …

Russia censors media by blocking websites and popular blog | World …

https://www.theguardian.com › World › Russia

14 Mar 2014 – Media watchdog adds Alexei Navalny blog and opposition news sites to banned list amid ongoing Ukraine crisis.

Russia to block access to cryptocurrency exchanges’ websites – report …

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/10/10/russia_to_ban_cryptocurrency_exchanges/

10 Oct 2017 – Updated Russia has announced a ban on the websites of cryptocurrency exchanges.Russian Central Bank First Deputy Governor Sergei …

Ukraine blocks access to Russia websites – Financial Times

https://www.ft.com/content/118bd84c-3a39-11e7-821a-6027b8a20f23

16 May 2017 – Ukraine says it warned Facebook of Russia fake news … did not reveal how they planned to technically block traffic to the Russian sites.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?rlz=1C1CHBF_en-GBGB712GB712&ei=88r-WdegNYH_aKelqqgM&q=websites+blocked+in+RUSSIA&oq=websites+blocked+in+RUSSIA&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0.55578.57676.0.58728.10.7.0.0.0.0.160.573.6j1.7.0….0…1.1.64.psy-ab..3.7.572…0i22i30k1j0i13k1.0.9VBOUkBYg9E

 

Websites blocked in mainland China

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Websites_blocked_in_mainland_China

 

9 incredibly popular websites that are still blocked in China

http://uk.businessinsider.com/websites-blocked-in-china-2015-7?r=US&IR=T/#pornhub-9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C.ET:

In china thousands of sites cannot be accessed. However, for years people had been able to download VPN (for free or after more assaults only by paying) that allowed them to access sites with the help of VPN- even if you are in china, your computer can browse as if it was in another country (a country without undemocratic, abusive censorship).

THAT WAS BAD, BUT NOW IF YOU ARE CAUGHT USING A VPN? IT HAS BEEN MADE ILLEGAL.

 

AMAZINGLY ENOUGH, I heard on the BBC radio how your searches recorded by the party and the state at large will influence how Chinese will have access to jobs, and even to services- as banks, phone and internet companies, etc, are nationalized. What is doubly amazing is that I cannot find for the moment discussions about it on the web. It might be a very recent unlocked news… see you later.

 

 

PS: SO CHINESE,                  TO NOTE, the interests that people have in freedom of expression is similar in the west. You may not censor a whole site but people will censor actors, agents there. For a beginning.

PS2: the only reason I am aware of that, is thanks to my having worked there. I listened to the news all the time, I would never have understood the seriousness of the situation through that, guess it proves I am a slow one.

PS3: I don’t know how it works in Russia, but from what I gleaned it has similar hues.

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Ban the preaching of child marriage by Islamic preachers – and all others.

MOHAMMED, THE PROPHET OF THE RELIGION ISLAM, ‘MARRIED’ HIS FOURTH WIFE, SHE WAS A 6 YEARS OLD, HE WAS OVER 50 YEAR OLD.

This petition aims at letting people know about a simple fact:

MOHAMMED, PROPHET OF THE ISLAMIC RELIGION, ‘MARRIED’ HIS FOURTH ‘WIFE’. HE WAS OVER 50 YEARS OLD WHEN THE POLIGAMOUS ‘MARRIAGE’ TOOK PLACE, THE ‘SPOUSE’ WAS A LITTLE GIRL CALLED AISHA, SHE WAS 6 YEARS OLD.

Mohammed married Aisha when she was 6, and consummated the marriage at 9.  There is some debate within Islam about her age, but the overwhelming consensus is 6.  Below are the hadith (records of the actions of Mohammed that are very much a part of Islam) in support of this:
Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married ‘Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.  Sahih Bukhari 5:58:236
‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.  Sahih Muslim 8:3310

From the hadith of the Sunan of Abu Dawud, volume 2, #2116 “Aisha said, “The Apostle of Allah married me when I was seven years old.” (The narrator Sulaiman said: “Or six years.”). “He had intercourse with me when I was 9 years old.”

http://wikiislam.net

“These texts are direct translation of the Hadith, Arabic Ḥadīth (“News” or “Story”), also spelled Hadīt , record of the traditions or sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, revered and received as a major source of religious law and moral guidance, second only to the authority of the Qurʾān, the holy book of Islam.

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/251132/Hadith

Hadith has become a synonym for the term Sunnah.”

However, the plight is not more about what the scripturessay but about the thousands of documents produced by Muslim preachers, believers or followers entirely condoning, honoring and recommending this marriage of an old man with a young child.

This information is accurate. Please, be aware that ‘these teachings’ legitimised as fundamental to the Islamic religion can be found by the thousands on the internet via a very simple word search.

Preaching that the marriage of Mohammed to a little girl is appropriate or can be taken as a, or the model has grave and beyond horrid and vile consequences.  From child marriage in countries like Saudi Arabia, to the many stories of Imams being caught on camera in Britain agreeing to marry children and presenting it as a suitable practise under Islam.

The campaign and petition have two purposes: One, to ensure that people know what happens. The ‘marriages’ in themselves but also the fact that marriages of children with adults are in fact professed via the teaching of Islam. Two, it would then ask the government to sanction direct or indirect incentives and incitation to paedophilia and child marriage (paedophile marriages). Pragmatically, it means that Islamic teachers should be condemning child marriage systematically, and be severely sanctioned when advocating it. To praise Mohammed’s life without expressively condemning child marriage is in fact support to paedophilia.

The prophet Mohammed is highly praised and constantly cited as being the prophet and only prophet of Islam. His name is introduction to almost any communication and verbal or written exchange in culture Islam.

No one needs to enter madrasas, Islamic schools, to figure out that Mohammed’s life is given as example and model.

PLEASE HELP US AND SIGN THE PETITION.

Will you send me back this word document or a note with your name and position, to record your protest and ask the government to stop the teachings (happening in public or private places, but even in schools or madrassas teaching children about the Islamic prophet’s ‘marriage’ to a child) allowing (and ultimately willing to enforce) this model of paedophilic marriage to take place.

Sign here to make the direct or indirect teachings of paedophilic acts explicitly illegal in the UK, in Europe and elsewhere- we will campaign without borders.

We know that paedophilic ‘marriages’ are not particular to one faith. We will use this campaign’s results as jurisprudence for any other forms of paedophilia.

STOP CHILD MARRIAGE PREACHING NOW. 

PS: These acts or arrangements have traditionally been called child marriage. Still calling them child marriage hopefully would remind us who needs to be, by any means, protected. To call them paedophilic marriage could focus on the criminalization of paedophile and paedophilic culture permitting, encouraging it. To call it ‘child marriage’ stops naming what, once we know, make us all complicit of, since not stopping it: paedophilia.

PS: Here the link to the petition, please note that two previous petitions has been refused or removed without any warnings or adequate justifications.

http://www.petitionbuzz.com/petitions/ban-the-preaching-of-child-marriage

Make a donation for a related ad to appear on the web.

Please make a donation for more awareness actions might take place, or simply for the information to be higher (or findable) in internet search and listings.

 

http://www.inthenameofhumanrights.com/

http://www.inthenameofhumanrights.com/

http://www.inthenameofhumanrights.com/


Ban the preaching of child marriage by Islamic preachers – and all others.

MOHAMMED, THE PROPHET OF THE RELIGION ISLAM, ‘MARRIED’ HIS FOURTH WIFE, SHE WAS A 6 YEARS OLD, HE WAS OVER 50 YEAR OLD.

This petition aims at letting people know about a simple fact:
MOHAMMED, PROPHET OF THE ISLAMIC RELIGION, ‘MARRIED’ HIS FOURTH ‘WIFE’. HE WAS OVER 50 YEARS OLD WHEN THE POLIGAMOUS ‘MARRIAGE’ TOOK PLACE, THE ‘SPOUSE’ WAS A LITTLE GIRL CALLED AISHA, SHE WAS 6 YEARS OLD.
Mohammed married Aisha when she was 6, and consummated the marriage at 9. There is some debate within Islam about her age, but the overwhelming consensus is 6. Below are the hadith (records of the actions of Mohammed that are very much a part of Islam) in support of this:

Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married ‘Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old. Sahih Bukhari 5:58:236

‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old. Sahih Muslim 8:3310

From the hadith of the Sunan of Abu Dawud, volume 2, #2116 “Aisha said, “The Apostle of Allah married me when I was seven years old.” (The narrator Sulaiman said: “Or six years.”). “He had intercourse with me when I was 9 years old.”
http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Aisha_Age_of_Consummation

“These texts are direct translation of the Hadith, Arabic Ḥadīth (“News” or “Story”), also spelled Hadīt , record of the traditions or sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, revered and received as a major source of religious law and moral guidance, second only to the authority of the Qurʾān, the holy book of Islam.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/251132/Hadith
Hadith has become a synonym for the term Sunnah.”

However, the plight is not more about what the scriptures say but about the thousands of documents produced by Muslim preachers, believers or followers entirely condoning, honoring and recommending this marriage of an old man with a young child.
This information is accurate. Please, be aware that ‘these teachings’ legitimised as fundamental to the Islamic religion can be found by the thousands on the internet via a very simple word search.
Preaching that the marriage of Mohammed to a little girl is appropriate or can be taken as a, or the model has grave and beyond horrid and vile consequences. From child marriage in countries like Saudi Arabia, to the many stories of Imams being caught on camera in Britain agreeing to marry children and presenting it as a suitable practise under Islam.
The campaign and petition have two purposes: One, to ensure that people know what happens. The ‘marriages’ in themselves but also the fact that marriages of children with adults are in fact professed via the teaching of Islam. Two, it would then ask the government to sanction direct or indirect incentives and incitation to paedophilia and child marriage (paedophile marriages). Pragmatically, it means that Islamic teachers should be condemning child marriage systematically, and be severely sanctioned when advocating it. To praise Mohammed’s life without expressively condemning child marriage is in fact support to paedophilia.
The prophet Mohammed is highly praised and constantly cited as being the prophet and only prophet of Islam. His name is introduction to almost any communication and verbal or written exchange in culture Islam.
No one needs to enter madrasas, Islamic schools, to figure out that Mohammed’s life is given as example and model.

PLEASE HELP.
Ask the government to stop the teachings (happening in public or private places, but even in schools or madrassas teaching children about the Islamic prophet’s ‘marriage’ to a child) allowing (and ultimately willing to enforce) this model of paedophilic marriage to take place.
Sign here to make the direct or indirect teachings of paedophilic acts explicitly illegal in the UK, in Europe and elsewhere- we will campaign without borders.
We know that paedophilic ‘marriages’ are not particular to one faith. We will use this campaign’s results as jurisprudence for any other forms of paedophilia.

Your signature would let the government know that people and gatekeepers are aware that pedophilic preaching is allowed in madrasas. STOP CHILD MARRIAGE PREACHING NOW.

 

PS: These acts or arrangements have traditionally been called child marriage. Still calling them child marriage hopefully would remind us who needs to be, by any means, protected. To call them paedophilic marriage could focus on the criminalization of paedophile and paedophilic culture permitting, encouraging it. To call it ‘child marriage’ stops naming what, once we know, make us all complicit of, since not stopping it: paedophilia.

 


I’d like to make clear that prostitution is slavery, particularly concerning youths, that are in fact breed in order to become this way exploited. You can even find rich guys bringing up ‘their’ children that way in order to reassure they own costumers, “do not worry we won’t do an officer of that one or we know what the boss is expecting in priority”.

I want to make very clear that prostitution is used not as a way of having sex, but as a way of destroying somebody. As a way of procuring oneself slaves for life in drugging them or inflicting psychological, mental, psychic, physical, trauma than no one can escape ever after.

Prostitution is a perpetual threat to the society, saying that you ll have it, if you don’t go down the lines.

Prostitution involved in general abuses to children in order to render them so in pain, and so incapable to trust anybody- for who apart them parents will talk to them?. A simple teacher in his career will meet score of pupils about whom he knows they encounter problem and sometimes sheer sexual abuses. they aren’t welcomed by their profession to talk about it. Very dangerous. Lose your seat. They aren’t even expected to give regular warnings against being sexually abused, letting children, thousands of them (thanks to social sciences stastistics we know that serious abuses during childhood range to astonishing 2, 3 women in 5, while other abuses less serious than outright and repeated sexual violence but mental and psychological or threat and attempt at non-consensual sex will concerned all of them.

Predators are awaiting the innocent child or the under informed or too sociable teens.

Predators or at least the ones that make an industry of it, will try to be parents, more surely will be.

Objective producing human beings so traumatised that they could stay their abusers’ dependent forever. Too traumatised to be welcomed by ‘normal’ people. Seemingly too aggressive or alert to suit the normal apathy and  psychological consensuality.

‘To kill somebody’

Not to ‘break somebody’ like the paedophile will say ‘amused by their relative freedom’  protected by the total taboo preserved up to the middle of the schools; but to ‘kill somebody’. It is done by ‘skilful’ persons that make their victims unwelcomed by the rest of the society, that molest their child when ‘they act normally, or cope well’, when they play, when they think, when they try and eat and they are hungry, when they are ‘too quiet’, when they feel they would like to speak with somebody’, when they feel the pain, when they try to stop it…

And who ‘give rewards’ against, in exchange of sex, scenario of affection, that are pretexts for sexual proximity, when the child or the adult will start’’ misbehaving’’ meaning here when they out of being taught display behaviour that make their aggressor out of danger of being found out. For example when they are insulting other people just like that, out of the blue, when they, the child or any other victims reject exterior help, or reject for example anybody that can or might sense that there is a serious or very grave problem going on, or whatever the scale of the abuses might be. To reject or bully anybody that could face and confront or report the abusers.

To be pedophile is against thousands of years of people assassinating and murdering each other to try to give to the next generation more than imposed by satan to angels hell on earth.

These paedophiles and sexual pests of any genres that are pretending to stand for stallions on top of that, and give themselves as example, being sometimes over smiling, cheerful, tactile, and joking all the way welcome by a laugh and charmed reaction by some, and politely ignored by the rest, but who cares about the little monkey they drag or visit at the end of the damned.

And dodging the others into believing that it is just like another industry (of more rotten tha death, that yes certainly)

Quoting and keeping trace of sources might be so time consuming that your renounce or prevent you to make the information, crucial, vital information circulate properly.

I have work for weeks on a post dedicated to human trafficking and sexual exploitation and the documents I worked on, several dozens of pages are troves of information more disgusting about state and organisations stances that one can never imagine. I am still struggling because though the docs are done by universities or charities or even the European parliament, revealing their data would cost me to breach their copyrights. Rewriting their documents in an appropriate way my entire year…

I AM ALMOST AFRAID OF CITING WHAT I HEARD IN LECTURES AT UNI, FOR MY PROF COULD SUE ME. BUT EYH. DO SO AND IT IS THE DATA YOU VE GOT ON TRAFFICKED PERSONS THAT I HOPE WOULD nail intellectual propriety or priorities.

In one
word- sexual trafficking is under the domain of quasi total ‘laissez faire’, see neglect and abandon of one’s assigned duties. It is less risky to traffic women than trafficking drugs. Resources as ridiculous as 2 computers for the UK is devoted to under age prostitution, and the data of and on these sorts went on and on.

Ok sorry for the poor writing and editing skills of what follows: is not good enough but I have to stop postponing it being posted as it will be a while before I can really revising it.

PLEASE READ THESE DOCUMENTS IN FULL THEY ARE EXCELLENT.

-106th Congress. (oct.28, 2000) Victims of trafficking and violence protection act of 2000. Public Law 106–386 [internet]

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/10492.pdf [last access 21-01-12]

– Bindel, J.  POPPY Project An Investigation into London’s Service Provision for Women Involved in the Commercial Sex Industry. [internet]

http://www.eaves4women.co.uk/Documents/Recent_Reports/poppysurveyfinal.pdf [last access 21-01-12]

-Galiana, C. Trafficking in women. The European Parliament.

[internet] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/workingpapers/libe/pdf/109_en.pdf [last access 21-01-12]

-Home Office. 2012 Human trafficking strategy. [internet] http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/crime/human-trafficking-strategy [last access 21-01-12]

– Jeffreys, S. (1997) the idea of prostitution. Spinifex press.

-Kelly. L, R, Wingfield, S, Burton and L, Regan. (1995 ) Splintered Lives: Sexual exploitation of children in the context of children’s rights and child protection. Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit:

University of North London [internet] http://www.cwasu.org/publication_display.asp?type=1&pageid=PAPERS&pagekey=44&itemkey=45 [last access 21-01-12]

Discuss the contradictions between immigration policy and human rights policies in aiming to protect victims of sexual trafficking in the UK.

Sexual trafficking and the responsibility that it involves within the U.K is sadly a subject that should be at anytime carried to the fore, due to the gravity of the offenses and astonishingly discretely more than present but increasing amount of crimes and bigger mafia corporations within the modern developed countries. Of course considered an attraction to many people in poor or very undemocratic countries; one will have to interrogate the government of richest, more secure and democratic countries that just prove their reluctance at assuming their responsibility to have human rights respected in ‘affording’, putting funds and truly efficient practises and policies aiming at the eradication of sexual trafficking. Instead of this, sexual trafficking is on the rise. The first paragraph will be remembering this issues to be global and human rights universal, the second will focus on how U.K institutions have reacted. The third part will reassert the principle of inalienability, politics of equality, and antonymic problem of double standards rights in case of non-citizenship.

 

Sexual trafficking clearly denotes an international phenomenon. “Human rights” them, are human and humane thanks to their having been proclaimed universal as a legitimate definition of rights appeals.  The fact that victims of sexual trafficking might well be abroad cannot be answered by making the ‘borders safer’ (Home Office, 2012) what is the prime and main focus of the home office strategies at reducing trafficking in the U.K, do not answer the question of ‘victims protection’ at large.

One of the main reasons for the control of migration is that huge economic inequalities entailing aggravated security threats are supported by controlling the borders, not just in view of securising peace, progress and prosperity but also as a means to keep exchanges and opportunities unequal and sources of deepening injustice. Better immigrations policies are often seen as pull-factors and are thus deemed and fated to stay the object of austerity.

The U.K thus will be under the ‘responsibility to protect’ and from this responsibility have to endeavour for the states and other actors to respect individual life (this term of responsibility to protect is concerning genocide in particular but there is no question about the fact that a gendered slavery of sexual nature will count as gendericide or infanticide- an attempt at undermining /destroying a person because or taking the pretext or the occasion (permitted by the overall status of them being targeted) of her being a woman or a child.

From the fact that one acknowledges a necessity to intervene when fundamental human rights are not observed will follow that whenever a state cannot help a population within the borders of another state enough, it will then will have to recognize the refugees, a status of asylum seeker (Galiana, 2000).

Attesting of this universality and transnationality and of how a system of rights and networks of information and policies convergence are needed are U.N and European treaties such as 1949 UN Convention for the Suppression of the Trafficking in Persons and the exploitation of the prostitution of others. The very importance of reminding universality of rights is an indispensable component. Globalisation and transnational activities includes violations of same nature. One of the most tragic in the way fight against trafficking occurs is that the mafias orchestrating them are and are left to be significantly superiorly organised and powerful than the institutions supposed to stop human and sexual trafficking  (Galiana, 2012). The enunciation of this reality, of institution of justice conspicuously too weak to fight crimes, render in fact states and citizens accomplices.

Now we had reminded that within the U.K is a duty to protect other citizens of other countries, how efficiently the U.K is protecting the victims of trafficking inside its borders is at stake.

While human rights are designed for human, migration and borders issues will prevail on the debate on citizenship. As there is so huge gaps of living conditions between countries, two persons in the same countries will receive different treatment according their being or not citizens of that country. In the case of sexual trafficking, the victims might well be stigmatised by the very officials and condemned instead of being protected (Bindel, 2011) due to the fact they are not citizens.

Within a country, multiple organisations are at stake.

In the first place, to fight the mafia and therefore prevent mafias’ activities one will have to rely on the police. Yet again, this phenomenon cannot be tackled without a global and particularly and European approach matching the transnational features of the mafias involved. Despite the emergency and gravity that this plague represents, an irrelevant amount of information are exchanged in between polices or via Interpol and home offices of the European countries (Galiana, 2000).  Additionally in the U.K the means devoted to fight within the borders are insignificant (Galiana, 2000), (Bindel, 2011). Furthermore the home office will focus their strategies on the permeability of their borders, limiting the subjects to migration, worrying the population about the potentiality of ‘a pull factor’ effect , when the government should start looking properly after the victims. The subject is approached without tackling the problem of sexual abuses perpetrated but focusing on the presence of immigrant persons (Bindel, 2011). As much as being inhumane and inconsiderate to the survivors of these crimes, and the society as a whole more and more exposed to growing crimes organisations and general applied depravity, the ‘pull factor’ effect  relies on a falsification. Yet again instead of tackling the crimes, all the discourses are aiming at the victims. Now there would be no ‘pull factor’ and no more sexual trafficking if the criminals in charge of procuring and all other illegal actions involved would be sentenced and charged with penalties proportional to their deeds (Bindel, 2011). In relation to this situation of unofficial endorsement of trafficking, there is not solvable judiciary system in which women can be protected as a witness and from there finally become the often sole means for the rings leaders and members to be judged. On top of having been institutionally raped and more, once they manage to meet people able to get them out of the ring, they will have to face a police that do not take their ordeals and statements into account. Instead they will take the highest risks declaring what happened to them, to see a justice system completely irresponsive to mafia industry (Jeffreys, 1997). If not given the status of refugee or asylum seeker then women would be send to more retaliation in countries were mafias are powerful enough to enslave them again (Galiana, 2000).

Another discussion will lodge on whether detention of women is enforced or not. Women detained by mafia in view of fleeing their coutries of origins where their choices of opportunities of earning a living are severely limited. When there is no proof of these women being locked up well the matter will be seen as secondary, just like if one could tolerated brothels made up by often lured but always intensively suffering women afraid of everything that could be the subject of changes, rhyming most often and probable with escalation of dangers under control in these conditions directly life threatening intending keeping women (Jeffreys, 1997). Proof of this ‘static conspiracy’ backing of sexual slavery or quasi slavery, always including profound torture for the body and mind, and for the all tissue of social morality, is the way women are left being abused in big and numerous places and brothels (logically know by the police forces) (Jeffreys, 1997). The fact that women victims forced or ‘garrisoned’ by those gangs might face being criminalised and punished for being or having become illegal migrants, in fact something incredibly worrying, and serves as law and well certainly as an standing image for the all ‘justice system and mentality’. If these examples were not sufficient, another rule of the land this colloboration can convey: if one compares the penalties inflict when someone is found being guilty of drugs trafficking, prison sentences might be of several years, over 5 years. If one is found guilty of human trafficking and especially of sexual exploitation, penalties will be of less importance, more than this, penalties will be often inexistent. It may be very lucrative to be a procurer in the U.K and even more when one will steal money from the ‘trade’ to leave women victims of prostitution completely destitute (Galiana, 2000). Even if recognised as having participated in sexual trafficking the penalties inflicted are ridiculously low, when existent at all. In that kind of condition there is no need to insist providing evidence- it is the clear frame in which all other institutions will have to proceed: a quasi-total impunity for sexual trafficking in the judiciary system in the U.K (Bindel, 2011).

The social institutions, will suffer the same fate than police in general, no information, no promotion about gangs or elaboration of inter-agencies aiming at stopping the trade and helping women. For voluntary organisation. An aberration of the u.k system is that the entire country (center and final target of migrants exploitation and transit) is relying on one single project,  the only project specialised in sexual exploitation victims. By comparison the other systems (non specialists) put into places are too flawed and incompetent to respond to the sufferings and other issues (tackling, exit strategy) (Bindel, 2011)

All too pessimistically the relative inertie of the states’ cooperation or of the united kingdom in particular can be explained simply by the facts that such ‘acts of slavery and debasement’ is ‘generating huge profits’ (Jeffreys, 1997), (Galiana, 2000).

The fact that prostitution is harmful for the individual and the societal aims and means should automatically disqualify it as being a professional activity. In the U.K even though prostitution is not legalised, it is tolerated. Taking the position of prostitution being insignificant matters, going as far as saying that it could be a benevolent factors, sexual trafficking is in fact treated as being no more than human trafficking, with no prison penalty as lightly as simple declared work.

The international and national laws and policies in place are reflecting the point of view and should go along the effects that social practises, morals, and laissez-faire have on individuals.

This international trafficking profit states. In satisfying punters demands instead of improving employment universality, and security or instead of infusing a culture where people relation are based on well being, freedom, and self esteem, in involving or giving the opportunities for the population to have a diversity of activities benefiting others (like in Marxism theories, and at least not depending on the dependency and ownership of means of production and exclusivity and enforcement as for the nature of the production and therefore the means of earning a wage).

The fact that perpetrators are not charged, that punters are desresponsibilised will institute what will be seen and said as being a legitimate market were relationship between people will be wrought as fundamentally relying on, depending on falsified notion of work, detrimental interactions, pure vicious and abusive exploitation entailing an impoverishment of the persons’ life as for it forges mindset and network of life going round the continuous and institutionalised violiations of dignity.

Here even immigrants laws will be better to follow for the well being of all and every than some of ‘human rights’ policies or principles. When introducing migration laws texts will guarantee the observation of human rights. Migration home office documents will reminds to all the necessary, the obligation of every one to treat people with dignity own to any human being and its rights and aspirations (to a family life, to security, to education, to have wages and work opportunities ensuring healthy living conditions) (Home Office, 2012). In other quarters some will use concepts as ‘feminism, sexual liberation (that certainly would not need to be paying coercion under the form of commerce if it had coherently occurred) individual liberties, sexual minorities, freedom of enterprise, in order to diminish reforms towards prostitution eradication or towards policies or practises tolerating or even enhancing them.

One of the adjacent discussions is to know about whether sexual exploitation is happening with the consent of the victims or is actually enforced or the fruits of indirect or direct coercion. Some women are duped into thinking they migrate for nanny, catering or other type of jobs advertised in their countries, even if they are bona fide locked up, put into some sort of debt bondage, intimidated by any means, whose belongings, earnings and papers are destroyed or detained. Adults or young children that might have been severely beaten, suffering from multiple, daily and continuous physical, mental, psychological, sexual abuses (Kelly, 1995 ), whose knowledge of the law and language of the countries of arrivals is quasi null, females that might have suffered all sort of horrors and betrays before even being trafficked (Kelly, 1995 ). One of the fundamental pillars of human rights are their being inalienable; it precisely means that when people are being or let take part in activities breaching rights (for example agreeing to slavery or torture) one cannot possibly invoke consent. One never can consent to one’s own destruction or of ‘being possessed’. Inalienability of right therefore means that brothels owners, punters or whoever participating to the terrifying act of trafficking and sex trafficking never should be judged as simply conveying people or as taking on people working illegally but judges as committed acts of sexual and physical degradation that implies that people enduring the ordeals even if they theorically could flee are in fact by some sort of consequences of posterior or present tragedy in such deteriorated mental, intellectual, psychological state that they cannot be exercising anymore the ‘skills, strength, knowledge, experience, assistance or consciousness’ that it may take to avoid been maltreated’.

Equally a very fundamental question of an enlarged definition of trafficking is in fact of the domain of the more ‘private sphere’ and yet still less supervising body of law. Brides trafficking, ’mail-order

brides’,  ‘matrimonial agencies’ or forced marriage, (Galiana, 2012) comes hand in hand with the conspicuous absence of law and mechanisms protecting, from domestic abuses, females married to immigrants men (Thiar, 2010).  It is interesting to note that sexual trafficking may take the form of marriage.

Mafias are mainly left unmatched. Need for prostitution alternatives and secure employment, harmonisation of criminal law at national, European and international level, and real political will and applied efficient policies are needed. Prostitution in the debates is an essential component, are 80 % of prostitutes are immigrants women in Europe (now coming from the East Europe mainly).

From the states to the individuals or groups of individuals, women and children let be the preys of organisations such as ones hosted by richer countries and by most powerful ‘customers’. Here like in the case of prostitutes considered necessary to sustain patriarchalism, women and children (involved in pornography or young girls on whom the consequences of being the victims of such crimes – not victims of an isolated acts but of organisations perpetrating gross fundamental human rights violations such as torture, sequestration, and in my opinion any sexual abuses all the more when targeting people economically or otherwise vulnerable, in an industrial manner or contending this person to have to endorse repeated, organised, intentional, orchestred, lasting in time abuse. The victims are the poorer and more vulnerable people (youth, previous history of personal issues, poverty). At the opposite of random acts, such organisations depends on such structures, that from the punters who pay and prowl to the society actually accepting such suffering to happen through the police not having to intervene as further more the immigrant women would suffer from being treated as a criminal because of their having not paper, treated as a non citizens deprived of human right of being protected of such mafia or anyone who abuse who are profiteerin g from an absence of justice and legislation. Amasingly enough so highly organised and intended crimes are left almost unpunished.

Bibliography:

-106th Congress. (oct.28, 2000) Victims of trafficking and violence protection act of 2000. Public Law 106–386 [internet]

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/10492.pdf [last access 21-01-12]

– Bindel, J.  POPPY Project An Investigation into London’s Service Provision for Women Involved in the Commercial Sex Industry. [internet]

http://www.eaves4women.co.uk/Documents/Recent_Reports/poppysurveyfinal.pdf [last access 21-01-12]

-Galiana, C. Trafficking in women. The European Parliament.

[internet] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/workingpapers/libe/pdf/109_en.pdf [last access 21-01-12]

-Home Office. 2012 Human trafficking strategy. [internet] http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/crime/human-trafficking-strategy [last access 21-01-12]

– Jeffreys, S. (1997) the idea of prostitution. Spinifex press.

-Kelly. L, R, Wingfield, S, Burton and L, Regan. (1995 ) Splintered Lives: Sexual exploitation of children in the context of children’s rights and child protection. Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit:

University of North London [internet] http://www.cwasu.org/publication_display.asp?type=1&pageid=PAPERS&pagekey=44&itemkey=45 [last access 21-01-12]

-Thiar, R and A, Gill. (2010) Violence against women in south Asian communities: issues for policy and practice.  London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley publishers.


The Reality of Puppy Mills

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVyFSTYY7zg

C.ET: You know when one sees something like that, hard-core corrupted occurring, in fact occurring many times and times again, to make money, and it is none of your business, then it is logical one loses faith, loses respect for everything.

Onto sometimes loose self-esteem or sadism for sexual kick and the impression in vain to retain power (on their scale of shame, scheme and haine (phonetic ‘hen’, hatred in French).

In vain, invade in vein.

Inc. invoice, in void.

Stepping Inside the Slaughterhouse

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNu6sY2duAY

C.ET: I don’t agree at all with the last part of this documentary. Breeding humanely towards death is the most hypocritical human lies. In fact more than hypocrisy at the final it is deceit.

I all the same propose to you to watch the video as it is an excellent documentary.

Please, we beg you, don’t eat meat = cooked murdered cadavers and since it is still legal under your own order.

PS: I hope the little girl won’t be finally paid by the farming industry to sell the lies of them being caring. let’s go on be caring that way, and like all dairy cows we will finish euthanatized just like some of these little new (but well-bred generally) students would recommend ‘out of compassionate care’ anyway. Or start selecting what they want for their barbies dolls convoluting the buttocks buttox later needed (responsible in mass for animal testing).

C.ET: that just shows the infinite torture during breeding and slaughter. However, whose fault is it, and above all there is no worse torture to be de kept alive to be used as food, whatever the methods. It is the filthy fault of meat-eaters.

Bloody Harvest: The Real Cost of Fur

Indian Leather Industry Exposed by PETA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZOeOtaWyIg

C.ET: that is the effect of denying the holiness of religion. I am not saying that there are plenty. However, denying one of them and we d become lifeless.

Animal testing at Wickham Labs (UK)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSzh9_bmo4Q

Not very distressful video, as I think we ve(t) lost the heart necessary to understand these types of cruelty, and therefore stop acknowledging a live of suffering, or our live permitting to lie, to breed and kill.

Heed, hill. Climate will change.

= think we ve lost the hear, think we ve lost the heart.

Think we ve lost the mind.

Deem.

Think we ve lost the vie.

Example of the perversion of negative rights and state laissez-faire.

Obviously state could endorse these experiments but are we citizens from the dead land of inferno, infer.

And when you think you have to design under cover to know 5 mn about these tortures.

Mind 5 mn of that should have been sufficient to close all the existing lab.

but…

Go inside a horse slaughterhouse

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJ8h1r_qv5c

Don’t watch.

C.ET: and here this puta cnn making us believe there is a human way.

Extreme animal cruelty in Australia *WARNING EXTREMELY GRAPHIC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMV8SHQCG9g

C.ET: Indigenous should obviously not be exempted of law against cruelty, that is typical of Australia sense of paternalism, which also is about letting people do just like if they were their child, no able to follow grown rules.  but you know what is the just rational for that. is that any tribes, nations, etc, are still allowed to kill animals.

It is the human species that should be endangered.

Stop animal cruelty: say no to cosmetics tested on animals

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8UwmJYCf7o

“Why Does My Heart Feel So Bad?” song.

C.ET: a video also reminding people that little mammals or little rodents, any animals, must be free and might be pet. That also lead to another big problem, are domestic animals free? Often is a ‘nep’. In a pen, without other companions, enough space to do and move, without mates or spaces. Any how noah where the environment. In-vitro.

Environment, envy.

 

Snakes Frozen Alive by USGE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BAfdkayfEU

C.ET: animals kept like if they were inhabiting their own grave or graveyard when mass murders is concerned.

The Reality of Puppy Mills

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVyFSTYY7zg

monkeyabusehttpLTJcPWHRf_g

picture from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTJcPWHRf_g

Malish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ia4Fd661GLM

c: IN ‘AN UNIVERSITY’ AGAIN.

ABOUT PUSHING THE ‘LIKE’ ‘DISLIKE’ BUTTON.

YOU KNOW DISLIKE BUTTON HERE COULD BE MEAN, I WANT TO PUKE ON IT ALL. AND ON MY SELF, AT THIS STAGE. WE ARE TRAFFICKED.


from peta website:   “Experimenters at the University of Utah purchased an orange-and-white tabby cat named Robert from a local animal shelter, drilled holes in his head, cut open his skull and attached electrodes to his brain. Sadly, Robert is not alone. At the University of Wisconsin–Madison, experimenters intentionally deafened a gentle cat named Double Trouble, […] peta_thermopicpetapicturecatelectrode       http:// peta.org.uk


An excellent film about the gathering of evidence and legal fight against one of the most powerful energy corporation on earth. The actual film showing both horrors of environmental industrial ACTIONS causing direct (visible, no need for a chemical kit- and invisible of course) environmental degradation, and the parody of justice, in fact even the travesty of the existence of a simple legal system going on and on.

Environment

CRUDE: The Real Price of Oil

Joe Berliner

“The story of lawsuit by tens of thousands of Ecuadorans against Chevron over contamination of the Ecuadorean Amazon.

One of the largest and most controversial legal cases on the planet.”

http://watchdocumentary.org/watch/crude-the-real-price-of-oil-video_2add2faf4.html

CRUDE

Guide

 

 


“Lawyer Who Beat Chevron in Ecuador Faces Trial of His Own”

Rodrigo Buendia/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Oil waste in Ecuador near a well that was in operation in the 1970s.

Enlarge This Image

Guillermo Granja/Reuters

“Workers cleaning up a polluted pool  in Ecuador in 2007. Texaco, now owned by Chevron, was accused of causing the damage. “

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/31/business/steven-donziger-lawyer-who-beat-chevron-in-ecuador-faces-trial-of-his-own.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

C.ET: This person (THIS HERO) just won a terrible case, (just watch the film, it is telling,) and the corporations are suing him for basically bringing the burden of proof to the for years reluctant authorities that I guessed bent because, thanks to the awareness campaign generated.

How utterly disgusting.

wikipedia

“Chevron has obtained an injunction from U.S. District Court against enforcement of the Ecuadorian verdict.[18]

“Despite these many setbacks, the Ecuadorian victims of Chevron’s pollution that Donziger helps to represent continue to attempt to enforce the judgment in Ontario, Canada.[19] Actions are also being pursued in Colombia and Argentina where, unlike in Ecuador, Chevron still has major assets.[20] Pursuant to these efforts, Chevron has already had assets frozen in Argentina, including bank deposits and its stake in a pipeline company.[21] These developments followed Donziger’s successful appeal before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals of Judge Kaplan’s worldwide injunction against the enforcement of the Ecuadorian judgment on the basis of Chevron’s allegations of judicial malfeasance in Ecuador.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_R._Donziger

C.ET: An excellent lecture on global warming, the abomination of industrialisation and our takings cabs less often than plane.

An Inconvenient Truth (1/10) Movie CLIP – Science of Global Warming

Former Vice president of the United States film at the origins of his being awarded a Nobel Prize.

Very good, both films changed literally my standard data on environmentalist emergencies, fatalities and the fatal re-actions or complete (complot) passivity (amorphous) of the authorities and businesses’ ethics, as businesses are now the only ones left authorised to speak about ethics with some sort of authorities. Though I am no fatalist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXMarwAusY4

C.ET: Species, space, pace, peace, place……………….and? PLACID

And the dream of the rocket that would deliver the human race off their dirty little secret like one or like we would lance a bio boil.

Fur uncle.

 

HERO, HEIR-O.

 


Sexual abuse and assault awareness and prevention law aimed at children.

  Extract from: http://www.erinmerryn.net/erins-law.html?goback=%2Egde_3978572_member_252283603

What does Erin’s Law do? 
With respect to the renewal of a Standard Teaching Certificate, provides that continuing professional development activities may include participating in or presenting at in-service training programs on sexual abuse and assault awareness and prevention.

 

 

Erin’s Law final Task Force Report

All it took was one night for my innocence to be stolen. From ages 6-8 1/2 and 11-13 two men molested and raped me. One a neighbor the other a family member. I wasn’t telling because nobody had educated me to tell. The only message I was getting was from the men abusing me. These men told me they would come get me, they knew where I lived, no one would believe me, I had no proof, and I would destroy my family if I told our secret. There are children across this world being told the same thing I was told and I have now made it my mission to educate and empower every child with their voice through Erin’s Law. A law I am determined to get passed in all 50 states. Make sure to scroll to the bottom of this page. Lots of information and videos on Erin’s Law.

The mission of  Erin’s law is to get education in all 50 states on the prevention of sexual abuse by empowering children with their voice instead of allowing sex offenders to silence them.

 

Education Program requires age-appropriate sexual abuse and assault awareness and prevention education in grades
 Pre-kindergarten through 12 
Effective immediately.

It should be passed in all 50 states. Common sense.
It’s as simple as that. “
Julianna Margulies

http://www.erinmerryn.net/erins-law.html?goback=%2Egde_3978572_member_252283603

http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=252283603&gid=3978572&trk=eml-anet_dig-b_nd-pst_ttle-cn&ut=3cEmZTectgZ5M1

C: Sexual abuse and assault awareness and prevention law aimed at children and why not in the UK?


 

Peter Tatchell Foundation

Reading University cancels “kill gays” Islamist preacher
 
Feeble excuse: fictitious threat of violent protests?
 
Cleric’s incitement to murder ignored in cancellation decision
 
Muslim Society not rebuked for hosting a murder-approving speaker
 
London – 28 February 2013
 
 
Reading University has cancelled today’s scheduled speech by “kill the gays” Islamist preacher Abu Usamah at-Thahabi, which was to be hosted by the university’s Muslim Society.
 
“Thahabi endorses the murder of gay people and of Muslims who give up their faith. He says women are deficient and encourages the beating of little girls who refuse to wear the hijab,” said Peter Tatchell, Director of the human rights lobby, the Peter Tatchell Foundation.
 
“While this cancellation is welcome, the university’s reasons for the cancellation appear to be bogus, feeble and unprincipled.
 
“The university authorities claim the Thahabi meeting was cancelled because of serious threats of violent protest by extremist groups. I challenge the university to name these groups and reveal the threats.
 
“The idea that Islamist extremists would threaten a fellow Islamist extremist is absurd. The planned student protest against Thahabi was always going to be peaceful and never made any threats, as far as I know.
 
“Unless the university has evidence they have not disclosed, its professed reason for cancellation looks like a vile, disgraceful smear against legitimate, non-violent protesters.
 
“To its shame, the university appears to have used a phoney excuse to cancel a speaker who never should have been invited to speak in the first place. Inviting Thahabi clearly violated the equal opportunities and non-discrimination policies of the university and the student’s union.
 
“Women, Muslim and LGBT students have a right to go to university without being menaced and threatened by hate preachers.
 
“Disgracefully, the Vice Chancellor has failed to condemn the Muslim Society for inviting
Thahabi.
 
“Thahabi’s hateful, violent views are not shared by most Muslims in Britain,” said Mr Tatchell.
 
See below the briefing about Abu Usamah at-Thahabi’s history of murderous incitements, sexism and threats against fellow Muslims.
 
See this online local Reading press report of the meeting’s cancellation, posted at 19.30 last night:
http://bit.ly/VaxxXY
 
A letter had been sent by the Peter Tatchell Foundation to the Vice Chancellor of Reading University, David Bell, protesting at the university’s decision to host Abu Usamah at-Thahabi, on the grounds that Thahabi had been filmed by Channel Four’s Dispatches programme justifying the murder of gay people. Incitement to murder is a serious criminal offence.
 
Below is a copy of this letter.
 
Other protests were made against Thahabi by the anti-extremist organisation, Students Rights, and by Reading University students.
 
Vice-Chancellor, Reading University
 
Dear David Bell,
 
I understand that Mr. Abu Usamah at-Thahabi is giving a talk at the University of Reading on Thursday, 28th February 2013.
 
This individual has incited hatred and murder of homosexuals. He has abused his right to free speech and infringed the right of LGBT people to go about their lives without threats or fear.
 
Please click on this link for more evidence of Mr at-Thahabi’s history of preaching hate and violence against LGBT people: http://bit.ly/QxFCVz
 
It is not good enough to monitor his presence on Thursday. His conduct before attending the University of Reading needs to weigh heavily upon any decision to permit him onto university property.
 
Allowing him to speak at your university would be a de facto reward for incitement to homophobic violence.
 
I would urge you to deny him a platform or hospitality, as it would be an insult to past/present/future LGBT individuals attending your university.
 
If Mr Abu Usamah at-Thahabi’s previous remarks had called for the murder of Jewish or black people I am sure he would not be permitted to speak at your university.
 
I urge you to not collude with a man who incites murder, and to not adopt double standards on incitements to racist and homophobic violence.
 
Equality for all. Hatred against none.
 
Yours with best wishes,
 
Peter Tatchell
Director
Peter Tatchell Foundation
 
Background Briefing on Abu Usamah at-Thahabi
 
Abu Usamah at-Thahabi has previously urged that gay people should be punished with death.
 
“Do you practice homosexuality with men? Take that homosexual man and throw him off the mountain,” Thahabi was recorded as saying by Channel Four’s Dispatches programme.
 
“If I were to call homosexuals perverted, dirty, filthy dogs who should be murdered, that’s my freedom of speech, isn’t it?”
 
On Muslims who leave the faith he said: “Kill him in the Islamic state…If the Imam wants to crucify him, he should crucify him. The person is put up on the wood and he’s left there to bleed to death for three days.”
 
He was filmed by Channel Four deriding women as “deficient”, inferior to men and religiously and intellectually “incomplete.”
 
He advocates violence against little girls who refuse to wear the hijab: “She should start hijab from the age of seven, by the age of ten it becomes an obligation on us to force her to wear hijab and if she doesn’t wear hijab, we hit her.”
 
Thahabi was caught on camera making these incitements while addressing worshippers at the Green Lane Mosque in Birmingham.
 
When he was later interviewed by Channel 4 News, he refused to withdraw or apologise for his comments.
 
Further information:
 
Peter Tatchell
Director, Peter Tatchell Foundation
0207 403 1790
Email: Peter@PeterTatchellFoundation.org
Web: www.PeterTatchellFoundation.org


 crimestopper

 

Crimestoppers and UKHTC enlist public to help fight labour trafficking

Read more

%d bloggers like this: