My o-pinion on brexit:

 

 

A scoop for many, but the voters in the UK- In the UK, you just have to turn up to vote, you do not need your poll card and of course not even your ID, as in the UK you do not have to have an ID at all. As for names and addresses they are on display on the internet. That is if I want to vote 1000 tomorrow for the same round, I perfectly can technically!!

So who votes?? On important elections, it is the party from the extreme that are the most militants so who voted during f. Brexit???

Believe you me, the ukip and other of those lots (who does their duties if democracy are not democracy and that UK is as good as elections as the worst of developing countries-yet again, in yet another domain, in the case of the UK).

I did observe this already this way of voting (without even talking about a system that is totally unproportional and Gerrymandering) without identification required should be illegal.

In paris, we had the dead that voted, several times. As I suggest previously you cannot say that between regions on their toes that toss and toast each other and localities that have a total supreme power over their constituents- without none of the agents having checks and balances on them, one get off the idea of a nation and even of a country further and further.

 

How do I vote in the UK general election? What you need to …

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/06/how-do-i-vote

Do I need to take ID to the polling station? You do not need to show ID to vote in England, Scotland and Wales. You will need to tell polling staff your name and address.

How do I vote? What you need to know about the UK general …

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/07/how-do-i-vote-in…

You do not need to show ID to vote in England, Scotland and Wales. You just need to tell polling staff your name and address. They will then cross your name off the list and give you a ballot paper.

 

Q5: Do I need to take my poll card to the polling station?

No, you will be asked to provide your name and address to the staff at the polling station but taking it with you will speed up the voting process.

http://spelthorne.gov.uk/article/2562/How-and-where-do-I-vote

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q5: Do I need to take my poll card to the polling station?

No, you will be asked to provide your name and address to the staff at the polling station but taking it with you will speed up the voting process.

http://spelthorne.gov.uk/article/2562/How-and-where-do-I-vote

 

 

Do you need your polling card to vote in the 2019 local elections?

https://metro.co.uk/2019/05/02/do-you-need-your-polling-card-to-vote-in-the-2019-local-elections-9359818/

 

 

 

The UK!!! Voting, louting, conveyer, hooligans’ country on holiday in ‘ther’ holly land dang. It is what that is.

 

 

How it just takes maximum a first semester in political sciences for beginners to know that referendum is widely considered as potentially totally undemocratic. You know, would you like to vote to rip lgbt people off their rights to marry, (one of the traditional step to bring people to worse than serfage) novelty.

 

A referendum initiated by a pm premier representative that was against. Those customs desing to totally undermine any trust that someone may have in the act of voting. Won’t proceed. Just preceded by voting for Clegg who pledge to protect university fees, for doubling them the moment he acceded his vice office.

 

You know why there is so much shambles in the house for Brexit. BECAUSE YOU DO NOT LAUNCH A REFERUMDUM THAT CHANGES THE LIFE AND FATE OF A WHOLE COUNTRY AND OF EVERY CITIZEN, OVER GENERATIONS AND GENERANTIONS, IN FACT OVER ITS ENTIRE, TILL THE END OF ITS FLOW (WHICH COULD BE SHORT ADMITTEDLY IN THE VIEW OF A kingDOM that ain’t that united, VOTING BY ONLY ONE GENERATION TOO (THE OTHER VOTERS WERE TOO BUSY BATTLING ON WITH REAL LIFE), WITHOUT AN OVERWHELMING MAJORITY BACKING IT.

 

 

A referendum initiated by a pm, premier representative that was against, or rather so he said, what the referendum propose to dramatically alter (or perhaps rob) = generations of efforts within what will always remain england’s continental neighbor. Those customs design in one song to totally undermine any trust that someone may have in the act of voting. Won’t proceed. Just preceded by voting for Clegg who had pledged to protect university fees, for doubling them the moment he acceded his vice office. A culture of overturned engagement and promises.

 

I am not a political scientist but I guess that the referendum would have been acceptable, it was not a question about human rights, it was not a question really debated, or if it had been the UK would have demonstrate lobbying for alternative policies and show their values, but of course if values are we are the best and we want to upgrade our empire velocity while the only thing that is really left is a linguistic dominion. Not ensured only by the mastering of a language but also the worst ethnical discrimination of demanding a native accent on it… …. ….. …….

To have elected a pm on this question may have legitimated the referendum but who would have dared?? If the referendum had a second run, the people who were happy with Europe, the people who are sick with politicians’ greediness and attention seeking behavior on their misdeed and inappropriateness for them to be validated would come and vote, also the ones who wanted to have a protest say. And I am sorry but also at a times when Scotland could have broken the uk. With a second tour a remain would assert what people call the people way. The oligarchs I say did it, the uk way. Belittling and hooligans, to arrange for their vassals to think they will have it till the end of millennia. Who think no one will spot their mafia because they haven’t got the italian brands. spot-on, just like the rest, dealing in buildings and banks, to face austerity: it is so certain oldwash, speculation is passé. And to replace skin-heads with discreet stabbing cultures, and people (yes the europe of peoples, you wonder after that that no one wants to stay! () who believe they have been chosen even though they cannot articulate it. No need of extrem when one can become filthy rich, you just have to look at people or not to kill them with nothing that could be held against you if trials were the products of judges doing their job and not the deal of whatever you want to call those sl#pp#rs.

 

Yuppie, you want to divide the word, the world into peoples, then kill them all it would be quicker.

POW.

But it would be to forget that they may be of some utility.

 

Maybe they wanted out because of having each time to exchange and fat the arses of their bankers friends (free to say friends when one is ok to indulge on such spending for things worth no pennies- project jet-set all over the country, quelle largesse!) without being able to show enmity. And also the cruelty of thinking loudly and forcefully for their counterpart, that a deal of breaking up would be better or lures livres lesser according, depending of their one leader, facing the logic of millions of other countries’ inhabitants (and not owners). In english a word might be in underuse: exasperation.

 

It is so astonishing that a ‘president’, well PM in the uk, against such an idea, all the same launched the referendum abolishing decades of a continental construction, without even a fight. I mean ok we heard before this a lot about eurosepticism, but did we a lot about an exit? The exit I was aware of before this one, was the independence of Scotland, an inner problem within the uk, not with the uk and Europe. In fact the Scottish possibility of breaking up the UK, have been managed with such disdain, that I though, oh goodness let’s hope they won’t take it the wrong way. I was for them ‘remaining’ within the kingdom (just in pasing, now the uk won’t have a queen for much more longer and that phallocracy is coming back for one do not know how many centuries- as we forgot, the foreigners even more so, that old England haven’t had dispose of their monarchs- it is what the charms of women do [not mysogyn, at least, at last they have it officially and this won’t be written off by the catholic hierarchy)- oblivion is nice for a while but look at what was behind), because to pass the right law we need to be strong, but just like everybody else that is not fasho, I am so afraid of strong governments that would eradicate human rights when they are true.

 

What I think is now very much in the face of everyone is this hysteria (both from the uk, and in Europe now), reminding the 52% of votes for Brexit. They are hysterical because this referendum has been lynched this way by the leading party only because the absolutely knew the results. Not the result of the people but of people voting. No one any longer listens to the politicians, unless they are after a course or the path to take to a sad, sad, sadism – to have to stop listening to every politician, because 1 min on their recital, you know that you are leading into the most frightening and ugly ‘mode d’emploi’. How to get away and administer sinister and sin that will in the course of your career help ya.

That still vote in parallel to abject discourses hoping to set the tone or for a blue print architecting the managerial model- it is why the lies and contempt and derision, to make sure everyone understands every 1 to 3 min the amount of ruffianism that politician ideologies are drawing. Hooligans that pay for plans and projects to be unused, destructors, defeating-their-initial-purpose (the happiness of the people, of people?, of all- their well-being – not the one provided by the feeling you can be fed on the next ‘apparel’, peer, pareil) and puerile.

 

As for the freight about how gracious England could be to Northern Ireland, no surprise here, the uk being one of the European countries (yes, still top of the class) the most ‘lenient’ on trafficking, fracking and on sea polluting- human rights, aren’t they?

The present PM, say they want to bring food to the table of working people. Food is not only what one wants to live in dignity, and then, what work are we talking about? We know here in the uk, you can afford food, and after that you beg to the banks for a credit that only the privileged can repay, and to afford alongside for the honorable parents, their kids’ once hons hot university. The millions of pounds (austerity) thrown on projects that could be dealt by thousands? To say millions of pounds paying staff for a single teen, to see them only project that those grown-up are able to build being them not to absconds too systematically (the rate just below always is high enough for it to be a nightmare by social services ordained) into drugs, criminality, to rule their carers as a possibility to show further how handle work ethics, prostitution and teen pregnancy To make sure that the building (society) arranges the grandeur while the only right left will be to wrought for big businesses a zero hour of security freedom and intelligence permitted, in front or not of assemblies, knitted microcosms of inequity. Contract, comfortable for the head blood suckers that make vampire literary representation a pale attempt at depicting the horror that prevail amongst the humans without canines, without nothing but the opportunity. I am not sure that on this paragraph everyone would have a clear image of what it said, but I’ d be prepared to advance that that will come.

Maybe they wanted out because of having each time to exchange and fat the arses of their bankers friends (free to say friends when one is ok to indulge on such spending for things worth no pennies- project jet-set all over the country, quelle largesse!) without being able to show enmity. And also the cruelty of thinking loudly and forcefully for their counterpart, that a deal of breaking up would be better or lures livres lesser according, depending of their one leader, facing the logic of millions of other countries’ inhabitants (and not owners). In english a word might be in underuse: exasperation.

 

 

And then, I want to say, I know too little, on the reasons of the oligarchies ‘end march’ of all sites-sides-sizes-cides, in fact nothing to really guess why those elites would push through, in fact ‘push’ putsch, for Brexit.

What kind of secrecy or manipulation of what kind would surge and merge people who said no, but all of the sudden are as in American, shitting themselves as each vocab or vocal that would not suit the new in place dictactoriat. The fishermen in search of nurses more in hue of their view of what were the ware of Gutenberg and Saxe-Coburg.

Only international rivalry, the first days of alliances, and axis, multilateralism, isolationism,populism, liberalism and socialism all united, and for the work for the retards, all the bureaucracy that that will generate. A no laws for big business, taxes evasion paradises, when you know that some greedy French now are Russian civilians, why not Monaco on a rock more northern …some other have passports and native accents that made them eligible to global mobility- but beware angles, even for the modest jobs now, even the ones with the ‘right nationality’, with a passport passe-partout, just starts having to be good or reasonably operant at their job (at stopping politics that would like to see a politics not towards wars but towards nature, nurture, beauty and liberty). And the files that will make money, for the middle-man that does nothing but take the percentage, the agencies that will have us all cooped and bled (hoped led). The only survivors the one on their way to mars, and that won’t be Europeans.

A French say.

 

PS: and when uk kicks the people that serves her for years, learning a new LANGUAGE, thinking they only needed a decade more to get the jest, host, hoist, gest, sorry, gist, and that just realized when they understand the lingo that their native accents, the accent of their very mum, will be at the root of racial racaille ethnical discrimination, more and more acute, by the time everyone with a little empathy knows you spent your life, re-larnin lehren leering luring speaking to be taken like a child to a serf without other possibility (the traders of all nations maybe excluded from outcast endless engrossed negotiations, as they brought possibly and exchange new technics on how to rally goods without spending any time, work on good! Or anything but a faith of debauchery, here the art of mockery for one’s one prosperity in milking and snatching everything from thoughts, to health, trees, rise, (dignitas and endangered), to anger, piousness and properties.

The vampires of all countries will never suffer racism, as they bound, from all corners of our world, and round the rest up on slavery. With a strata a layer effect, have to stay and state realism, why, what better than one’s own castle and liturgy of what is to feed upon- for free (not liberty).

In plain language, do not kick people that came here, learn a new language, and that have nothing back to their countries of origin, but a diluted sense of how they used to speak during their tender years. Do not kick people that have done the bilingual epopee, to be treated like if Europe never has existed- they just did not get it what was to come on no income.

 

Trap, a strap,   through arson and assault to defend what they have been elected to be for (the forestall-stake, tell, talk, stage stale, ale toll—stood stool=stole) of that was a liberal coming to the government voted in to protect universities and academia against rising fees, for him to participate to the doubling of the fees- a reiterative pattern of betrays, a linear story- the same plot of no leader but executioner of democracy; the reminder, the reign of unsolvable staggering bourgeois bourgeon, feasting on dishonesty, die old stabbing, staging monarchy.

Plundering, abusing not only the vote of people but plainly how people get to build better and stronger activities.

 

Plot

Now they should be giving the lead to the opposition party? Yes, if you could trust one. One that would convey of this, and annul (annul the deal of the sudden sullen deserters, not the debt their same project managers made sure was exponentially, opponent, driven into buildings and no social protection, as they invest into laundry- money coming from the dirty of all shapes in forms- the cons and the ones that sweat blood to never go to hospital before dignitas may be taking the place as blessed token of patriarch philosophy. Politics would force the leader to do a second referendum, even though the first one should never have happened. Politics is not snatch and run. But no one or almost states it- and in any case not the opposition. So I am not saying it is the truth but to me, the REFerundum (hom, homo-sapiens or DUMb rather than DOM) refractory, refectory. Was a machination. Of all part-tease.

In haste with ease.

 

Not every information is academically sponsored and also follow the instinct suite therefore, but one cannot spend so long of search, quest and wonder about and around neglig-able, or at least so neglected territory.

Spelling it, personally I was so shocked that the uk left but after so many months, somewhat the childish hope that its ultra-liberalism, its mercantilism and market economy would not be so much used as a blue-print for the rest of Europe came to alleviate the angry agony.

After what Europe have done on the map as patron, including leaving people into concentration camp in Yugoslavia, and no need for vampire narrative, as no canines are needed to kill and torture they own country side (with the farmers breeds the cattle litany britanny, no trees are left so made the best of the marshes and grass is daring and cunning unprecedented) and their ex colonies. After macron whose French intellectuals say that it is the installation of financial and privatization oligarch napoleonic cliques. The uk coo coup some kind of post gold rush destiny.

DEMOCRACY IS ABOUT THE RIGHT AND DUTY OF THE PEOPLE, ‘HELL-EAT’ WOULD HAVE US TO BELIEVE THAT IT IS BALLOT AND NOTHING ELSE MUCH MORE COMPLICATED.

 

14-12-2018

Blogs’ dates have been changed in order to make appear the posts of higher importance, marasmus and emergency to the fore.

 

https://www.economist.com/britain/2018/12/12/across-the-world-anglophilia-is-giving-way-to-anglobemusement

Across the world Anglophilia is giving way to Anglobemusement

This view has been shattered by Brexit. Foreigners increasingly talk about Britain in the way they would talk about an admired relative who has gone stark raving bonkers.

The first thing foreigners focus on is the sheer chaos of it all. “Isle of madness” is one headline from Der Spiegel. “A Shakespearean tragedy” is another from La Tribune.

The second thing is the amateurism. Britain was thought to have a Rolls-Royce government.

https://www.economist.com/britain/2018/12/12/across-the-world-anglophilia-is-giving-way-to-anglobemusement

 

C.ET: who’s lost their standing, and whose ‘help’ do not know?

No, I would differ, still well humored they are the corn beef.

– aye darling your accent is charming, and all the ones of the nobles’ welcome as long as with money and above all for the prosperity and posterity with their barbary law.

 

Maybe they wanted out because of having each time to exchange and fat the arses of their bankers friends (free to say friends when one is ok to indulge on such spending for things worth no pennies- project jet-set all over the country, quelle largesse!) without being able to show enmity. And also the cruelty of thinking loudly and forcefully for their counterpart, that a deal of breaking up would be better or lures livres lesser according, depending of their one leader, facing the logic of millions of other countries’ inhabitants (and not owners). In english a word might be in underuse: exasperation.

 

All of that, could come to a contrast against what in the continent pupils have been told through images of a standing straight wearing tweed, discreetly amicable, at least to me, teaching (like the only job will have now oversee-seize-seas) respectable lady.

Like if one, everyone or the vast majority did not need help to prevent the MPs and their sponsors and mafias of all countries taxing the common people into their own very interest: people’ s disempowerment and poverty deployed versus richness coming from, well I am not here to list or enlist what we did on this dormant earth- deprived now of everything that even without books, animals of all perceptions, measure and abilities will know, will realise by the thousands evidence throw at them and their absence of descents that they let live a hoist that no intelligence could desire as partner on no day- that thanks to us will be irremediably suffering the hell humans fabricated.

And also to flee(ce) the European community through the back door, without a gesture towards fighting for a better EU, without a debate, without a stance first- only making sure or trying to have no debts to be repaying, lacks so much of distinction that it might well be this that will remain in the annals of political history- historical hysterical. Poise on.

 

And officialese, in terms of Brexit, sometimes often, bbc does not say much about things, but bbc 4 at least has a whole program a month about gambling addictions taken to a severe level of oblivion in the uk.

SMUGGLERS: As for the backstop and the border of Ireland- that ain’t brits as a reinder for the non-assertive asset adverted-, surely the uk would not consider becoming a back door to any traffic, a bit like North Korea (after who have surrounded Tibet, the water can of all Asia- i am not sure if that was in return for Hong-Kong or what, to China?: not the com) or other terrorism linked.

Smuggling is chic from or for one merchandised market that ban(e) benefits (feat a tantrum and seizure) already from all the best deals, rates and laissez-passers.

From the contempt you can read that the ENG mocked the Irish, mocked the Scottish, and on top they ain’t even the English, just like the trails of tears, no English remains on this land name great England. Now, will be damned those who profit from a land instead of serving her, like patriotism says (see ya) of itself it is about. Damned and condemn pathetic conmen.

 

 

 

Cor(ps).

 

Latin: Cor (coram) ‘In the presence of the people’

 

And also astonishingly, what ‘journalists’ use to calling arena (Arian), is nothing of the sort. It is like now, no one who was for a remain is to fight for it for any longer (monger) length of time. They all swapped down to their knickers and vests combi to one with which they will be way more comfortable to wall people onto the rim like the animals they despise and disposed of- just there remaining, left to represent what life is worth thus for those connies -ethic with ease-. No talking about Brexit but parliaments in general. People did not have trust, the votes will be now utilised as cut-throating legislation that instead of being illegal, just like the sharia and western work contract that will make impossible a living, will through passing, through endless reorganisation between centers of power (see our neighbour, councils, lords and boroughs) made us make us deservingly into extension-extinction. In sum, what now everything is crumbling and that species already had done everything they could undo with mining-collapsing. Like the poo-poed-pee-piss of a trump – a far outcry evolution mark from wat he would have come up with: poopoopeepeethankyoumummy, and its choirs repeating it (may that, part.ners and followers alike chock on their own s- craps and s-hits) isself hera.lded by many others and by those multi-billionaires Mormons, polygamous and the us heavily into porn and prostitution calling for trials like the ones that polluted the amazon by chevron, calling for lorries of documents to be delivered to release an uncontroversially (not uncontrollable) devil, more than winning, in all glory of the ones by the elites (yes the hell-hits) supported. but until now still ghee the US stood as international dreams. And now?? No people, no person will never dare to differ again since the mafia more than made it, it owns it.

Differ / faire= do in french that would put the verb do a relic of the past until politics of pollution will have us tres-passed.

The name is a pit, but the snake’s main dinner won’t be in between those inbreed despotic nepotist brainless governors. And it won’t be the tumour.

 

Speaking of which, the pits or marshland let’s hope will suit vegetables and more than only pumkins and squash- for those who have for centuries the lambs laid and slain, the same one they say they would serve- and not galvanise themselves through farms, pharmaceutics, and genetics-or eugenics again- in view of more commercial – validated!- slaughtering that hopefully will soon see our logical oblivion, washing, dissemination- not insemi (it seems that the seeds of horrification sown seldom sick seduction submissionsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss). Arch sacked, Sank.

 

 

With the planes that will replenish the atmosphere layers. The planes that the neo-nazis cannot miss liking as they kill the poorest, the southest of all islands. And the ports that will all belong to empires bought by china for Africa. So about airports why on earth complain?

 

Rehearsal, here hear sale: Smug faces, parrot like repetition, and inchoirence explained.

This BUNCH hilariously jesting on democracy and the will of people that are once pull forward (not when (ex) education become or remain unaffordable- no, that won’t disturb or disrupt the lords). No one is for any split second of a ram -random- remain and except because they are not politicians in web minister but just forgers why????

Because WE ARE WITNESSING THE ONGOING NOT BATTLE BUT ORDELY COHESION OF A PARLIAMENT THAT BY A REFERUNDUM STARTED THE PROCESS OF GIVING MORE AND MORE POWER TO ITSELF. POWER, SOME OF IT, AND THE LEGITIMATE ONE THAT TRY TO PROTECT FOR EXAMPLE GOVERNMENT TO ALLOW INSECTICIDES DECIMATING THE BEES LIKE ENGLAND HAS DONE, LEGITIMATE, WHEN IT WAS, A POWER IN ANY CASE HAD BEEN DEVOLVED TO EUROPE-THE REGION. AND NOW EXIT FROM IT MEANS BLUNTLY THAT THIS POWER WILL COME BACK TO WHOM??? NOT THE EUROPEAN MP A LOT TRYING TO BREAK EUROPE OR BRINGING BACK THE AXIS BUT TO THE PARLIAMENT- themselves now sole guarantor, defender and definer of their own cor-o-nation, (and s.audi collaboration explained sharia law all over the outlet and outland England as it stays while and after shatting wales and Scotland, what will be left? The commoner wealth) TO THEIR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WHERE THEMSELVES AND FRIENDS WILL BE SO QUIET TO FAKE, TAKE. Ache is a word of the past, as the past has some horizon. Heck-lures.

For just one in brakets: one can go on, on and on, against ill islam and its sharia, pedophilia, slavery, that is thin and think inner to it. But for the moment the ones who permits sharia law in England are not the millions of muslims preaching that their prophet is that ignominy on themselves. Not stopping the ONES responsible – the non-muslims allowing that- for that while increasing islamophobia, while islam could soon become compulsory for the rest of it is what?? Nazis and castrated (of which I am, enable to do one single thing against the plague of child marriages to list again that one, and on which they are right, it is not pedophilia it is worse than that, pedophilia can be stopped and cure, and disarmed not one cult combining millions that are respected and in power and expanding in all manners on top of that- soringly sorry but I am not the one venerating a pedo and sex slave owner being adorated by millions and protected by billions by what people self-called  tolerant instead of scelerat (French for obsolete, polluted, soiled, miserable, petty, ignorant, pervert, weak, lurid, rogue coming criminals.)

All about terrorism yes because, contrarily to the definition of terrorism, what they do is sponsored terror that is states organised.

 

Why does ‘decisions’, incisions making (deck dis) sometimes take so long, for the MPs to understand where lie their profits, nothing ever to do with human rights, democracy and them to be served and serving.

 

 

 

 

 

TAKing, Ta king.

BREXIT IS AN ONGOING TAKing OVER OF A POWER THAT HAD BEEN DEVOLVED TOWARDS COOPERATION WITHin A BIGGER TERRITORY – COOPERATION ABOUT WHICH NOONE KNOWS, AT LEAST NOT THE ANYONE LISTENING TO MAIN STREAM WEBMINSTER COMMUNICATION ON EUROPEAN HISTORY (apart the fact that the UK royals are of german descent- german who have historically been themselves the one best ally of the ottomans, it is a relief for the sole French culpability on collaboration [even though the French have been regarding themselves as the epitome of resistance]- let’s now hope it is because they were surrounded not fully engaged).

 

It is perhaps why the deal quick exit has been postponed in that end year of 2018, because since revolutions people have coined to beware the speed and peerage of passions. ABM then what would do your patriots but selling their teaching cap-ability and then play a peep ‘an englishp(e)ers-on in New-York’.

 

 

LE-AVE.

 

 

 

CHOSE VEGANISM, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD.