SHARIA LAWS

with pics:

www.inthenameofhumanrights.com

 

All the more because staying Muslim is deadly compulsory in Muslim countries, I want here to precise again, that of course, not all Muslims are favourable to this version of Islam and could lay their faith on the Coran only or would stop regarding the life of Islam’s prophet as being an example and model. But to be realistic, it would be, one very difficult to rationalise it and only sieve within the body of work that is regarded as edifying this creed. Two, to succeed retaining only the humane would have to be, in a tradition that in fact has totally iconised for centuries (to the point of revering only one figure, and desacralizing all other pictures) who they call the last prophet (and its lines, hereditary families or those of other historical figures linked to the expansion and colonisation of Islam, here to add that until even now, and so by extinction the last century Islam was in fact colonising and becoming compulsory for millions of people in country side all other several continents, who were attached to their own beliefs, traditions and ways of life, who would never have had read the coran or gone to a Mosque- that islam being newly in favour is a myth as it has been the instrument for centuries of colonisation, that islam is in fact the belief of all since then is a myth as genuine people on their lands, in mountains and urban areas did not know and rather have been violated by a creed that was and still is medievalistically and imperialistically imposed unto them) and therefore his life (polygamy, slavagist, rapist….) would, and in attempting forced conversions even more, only temporary.
It is suffocating to hear most of the followers of Islam talking about Mohammed their guide, as if it was in fact the pillar of their movements. All these guys, and ladies, claiming and sounding the bugle for their icon and models everywhere, and on main stream media, who do not lift a single finger, who do not make any attempt at clarify for their stupefied audience, what is, what it means, its tenor.
Tenure, when the tool falling for abuses is a term.
Terminus.

Sharia Law
https://www.google.com/images/cleardot.gifSelect Languagehttps://www.google.com/images/cleardot.gif https://www.google.com/images/cleardot.gif▼
Shariah lawSharia law is the law of Islam. The Sharia (also spelledShari’a or Shariah) law is cast from Muhammad’s words, called “hadith,” his actions, called “sunnah,” and the Quran, which he dictated.
According to Sharia law (see links for details):
• Theft is punishable by amputation of the hands (Quran 5:38).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing Muhammad or denying that he is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah is punishable by death (see Allah moon god).
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death (See Compulsion).
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A woman or girl who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• Testimonies of 4 male witnesses are required to prove rape of a female (Quran 24:13).
• A woman or girl who alleges rape without producing 4 male witnesses is guilty of adultery.
• A woman or girl found guilty of adultery is punishable by death (see “Islamophobia”).
• A male convicted of rape can have his conviction dismissed by marrying his victim.
• Muslim men have sexual rights to any woman/girl not wearing the Hijab (see Taharrush).
• A woman can have 1 husband, who can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls’ clitoris should be cut (Muhammad’s words, Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination (see Quran 4:34 and Religion of Peace).
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife; a wife needs her husband’s consent to divorce.
• A divorced wife loses custody of all children over 6 years of age or when they exceed it.
• A woman’s testimony in court, allowed in property cases, carries ½ the weight of a man’s.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits (see Mathematics in Quran).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to eat must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah – i.e., be “Halal.”
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• The list goes on (see Sharia law in America, Canada, Europe and UK).
The number of countries penetrated by Sharia law continues to grow, as does the depth of its penetration in the countries already affected.
http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/sharia-law.html

Stop believing what Muslims tell us about Islam (see Taqiyya).
There are several forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, the best known being taqiyya (the Shia name). These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause of Islam – in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx

Al-Taqiyya, Dissimulation
https://www.al-islam.org/shiite-encyclopedia-ahlul-bayt-dilp-team/al-taqiyya-dissimulation-part-1

C.ET: the mistake what is made by the people countering Sharia law is that they want to fight against islam as a whole, while we have to fight all against any types of exploitation, racisms, all forms of discriminations, and ways humans have to exploit others- be them humans, animals, nature and believes- whatever, however this exploitation name might be or take.
Can Muslims be executed for converting?
Apostasy, or leaving the faith, is a very controversial issue in the Muslim world and experts say the majority of scholars believe it is punishable by death.
The Koran itself declares there is “no compulsion” in religion.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-27307249

c: AS usual the BBC will tackle a subject given looming headlines at best like here, but as almost always just talking about 30 years old issues as had it be avant-garde the like of, and this way give the false impression that subjects are reviewed without a say. I mean ok, recent very good BBC reports on Chinese censorship, could come from their having censored themselves there, in Honk-Kong, but who told you that Muslim if following the life style of their prophet will have to torture, rape and killed, well once they are the sultans in a swing.
Us all. Use all.

Sandra Laville
Tue 23 Jan 2018 12.18
‘We believed he would be in jail for life’: the story behind John Worboys’ imminent – and baffling – release
She said: “It feels far too soon for this dangerous and manipulative perpetrator to be released into the public having served this woefully short time in prison.
She told the Andrew Marr Show: “I fully recognise why people are concerned about this.
“We want to ensure that victims feel confident enough to come forward, so that they feel confident that the police will take action, and confident that they will get justice.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jan/23/john-worboys-release-black-cab-rapist-parole-board-jail-for-life

Amber Rudd rejects calls to legitimise sharia courts over fears for UK laws
HOME Secretary Amber Rudd has rejected calls to legitimise sharia “courts” in Britain.
By JOHN TWOMEY
PUBLISHED: 22:20, Thu, Feb 1, 2018
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/913414/Amber-Rudd-Sharia-law-court-rejects-calls-legitimise-fears-UK-laws

C.ET: about the article above, if you wish look at this soup but it is just not convincing. It is the unbearable approach of a government covering for scandals such as Saville, P.I.E, absence of intervention by police and social services allowing grooming perpetrated against teenagers, and the fact that the UK is one of the best countries to grow human trafficking, the very recent release of ‘public enemy number 1’ such as Worboys, by judges still roaming the streets, in the so called courts, take apart common sense to gain again more room for the regime of fear that has loomed and keep drawing.
Numb facing fear, and its shaping.

Theresa May told the Andrew Marr Show: “I fully recognize why people are concerned about this.
It is just like May saying that they are concerned for the death in the blaze in the London borough provoked by unfitted buildings, under the supervision of millionaire bosses or managers imbeciles. They did not say we will chase, and punish people building death traps for others, they did not say that they will inspect other consturc.
Not in fact in the uk, ans certainly in many other countries, since any how it is lethat capitalism that is the leadr of today’s policy, every one who knows how affairs and maters of life and business are managed, by all these blue print managers that are representated by the politicians, who do not represent the people but l the dishonest people and the way the country is misled- all examples of speech of how it is allowed in fact dictated on how you have to deal and mistreat customers, collegues, trainees, senior, juniors, qualified, newcomers, experts, whistleblowere and fired and firms.

Just a little text “poetry: to tsay I don’t even listen to 1 min of them, because even in 1 split it has too much one can take of si distate and dismay of a dictact that seem so pround , stable and unsanely slay.

C.ET: I admit I stopped trying to analyse any politicians discourses, because there is nothing or too much going on. They are just for every each of them, a big calorific slices of treachery, class abuses, patronizing theories that are unintelligent, disrespectful and have for sole function to dictacte the way the today’s (each time hopefully temporary- but in repetition of the same frog roos gross grotestque imbecility there is no temporarity. Just temporal hell changed into secular templar, with guys with airs of sacro-sacn sanct devility.

Between Cameroon who unc cries on the front to the nation and those of the cameras at the death of his son, slashing financial help for kids in the uk. While the rich and ambitious royal ambitiously flirts with expansionist emperors like china, uk is top countries of child poverty.
And the only time he seems to speak to somebody, except when per preparing Brexit through debilitation speech at English and Scottish, pissing thus on UK integrity.

WHILE WE HEARD A THOUSAND TIMES, THAT THE REFERENDUM IS THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS BY EXCELLENCE, THE WHY THE ENGLISH PEOPLE WILL STOP BEING A PART OF EUROPEAN POLITICS. THE FIRST THING ONE LEARN ABOUT IT, IS THAT IT IS VERY ARGUABLE THAT REFERENDUM ARE DEMOCRATIC. THE FIRST THING ONE LEARNS IN DEMOCRACY STUDY. AS FOR THE ONES WHO LET THE GAY MARRIAGES BEING A VOTE MATTERS, THEY ARE IN FACT, FASCIST. GAY MARRIAGE IS SIMPLY A BEING. BEING LAWFULLY THE EQUAL OF THE OTHERS, HAVE THE RIGHT TO MARRY. ONLY THIS IS NOT GIVEN TO PEOPLE IN STATE OF SLAVERY.

(out of the complete shock of loss, losing the uk, maybe now Europeans will feel relief at not having a loose toss to emulate the uk creating so many inequalities and poverties, and the concentration of richness and the spread of core crookeries, disempowerment and unfairness.) it won’t happen because many English think they are the navel, so few Europeans people have the slightest ideas of what is going on, on a land where people claim human rights as the possibility for FGM and enslavement.

Knowing the uk a little bit, just has to pray that it is less the case or not the case elsewhere, but let’see what they mean by utopia. )

While the Stephen King’s ‘IT’ of UK politics, previously mayor of London and current Foreign secretary, who made impossible for a working class to pay the transportation taking them to work and places where they can gathering around other themes than communities.

Above all in alma mater London where no go zone for police, not due to Islamic violence, but politics, that protect rich borough from crimes but not poor ones. Where stabbing flourish in some while the police reside in south London, protecting the sole hope for the free uk, their airports…
While the opposition promised to its very best, to give power to the many.

The new Monaco who now, that has been for decades praised and admired because people, normal, the fair ones, can stand a few generations of females being king, because we had to be relieved at the apparition of feminity (not too many generations though because their presence mean that war propelled inequality and insecurity, injustice and the need for a sword that capriciously sway). But now dear England is about to see a male for heir, what better shame can hope the distinguished that quit their continent without as much as a debate. Yet caution to give an idea, the first thing that I have learnt in democracy studies well before 2016, is that referendum are not by nature democratic, just like people are asked to decide if equal marriage is the thing, or why not whether universal suffrage is the next to be…eradicate.

THE MOST FAMOUS HISTORICAL USE:

“Tyranny of the Majority.” (“Tyrannie De La Majorité”)

http://www.quotecounterquote.com/2010/08/tyranny-of-majority-vs-tyranny-of.html

I am a vegan and I respect vegetarians profoundly for not creating flesh in hell each time they have to fill their body. but here you are.

Here you are why IT IS SO GOOD TO BE ACCUSED OF ANTISEMITISM, BECAUSE OF THE MUSLIMS VOTE. I AM NOT saying vote from Pakistanis, Indians, Iranians or of any particular countries, I AM SAYING MUSLIMS. AND SOME CHRISTIANS. AND OF EVERYBODY THAT WILL END UP IN CHAINS.

Quote/Counterquote: “Tyranny of the majority” vs. “tyranny of the …
http://www.quotecounterquote.com/2010/08/tyranny-of-majority-vs-tyranny-of.html
6 Aug 2010 – Two decades before that, Voltaire had used the similar phrase “tyranny of the many” (“tyrannie de plusiers”) in his Philosophical Dictionary (1764). MAJORITY VIEWPOINT: “The tyranny of the minority is infinitely more odious and intolerable and more to be feared than that of the majority.” William McKinley …

Tyranny Of The Majority Quotes (1 quote) – Goodreads
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/tyranny-of-the-majority
Yet where absolute monarchs had failed, democracy succeeds, for the strength of the majority is unlimited and all pervasive, and the doctrines of equality and majority rule have substituted for the tyranny of the few over the many the more absolute, imperious and widely accepted tyranny of the many over the few.”

THE MOST FAMOUS HISTORICAL USE:
“Tyranny of the Majority.” (“Tyrannie De La Majorité”)
Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859)
French historian and political pundit
Title of a section in Chapter XV of his book Democracy in America (1835)
Tocqueville’s use of the phrase “Tyranny of the Majority” in his famed book about his travels in America is often credited as its origin. In fact, it had been used before. For example, it appears in one of the “Letters of Agrippa,” the American anti-federalist documents believed to be written by James Winthrop in the late 1780s. The Agrippa letter dated February 5, 1788 says: “A bill of rights…serves to secure the minority against the usurpation and tyranny of the majority.” Two decades before that, Voltaire had used the similar phrase “tyranny of the many” (“tyrannie de plusiers”) in his Philosophical Dictionary (1764).
http://www.quotecounterquote.com/2010/08/tyranny-of-majority-vs-tyranny-of.html

Tyranny of the majority – Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority
1.
2.
Tyranny of the majority (or tyranny of the masses) refers to an inherent weakness of direct democracy and majority rule in which the majority of an electorate can and does place its own interests above, and at the expense of, those in the minority.
‎Term · ‎Illustrating scenarios · ‎Usual no-tyranny scenario · ‎Federated centralization …
LSE BREXIT – Thanks to the referendum, the tyranny of the majority …
blogs.lse.ac.uk/…/thanks-to-the-referendum-the-tyranny-of-the-majority-has-prevaile…
1.
2.
28 Jul 2016 – The notion of the tyranny of the majority was popularised by the 19th century political thinkers Alexis de Tocqueville (Democracy in America) and John Stuart Mill (On Liberty). It refers to a situation in which the majority enforces its will on a disadvantaged minority through the democratic process.
tyranny of the majority – Jstor
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40982538
by FA HERMENS – ‎1958 – ‎Cited by 2 – ‎Related articles
various minority groups that compose a modern state, be they of a religious, racial, social, or political character. Thomas Wood- lock said at one time that “Democracy is the protection of minori- ties through the rule of the majority.” The reason is to be found in the simple fact that it takes members of manyminorities to.
Tyranny of the majority – Wikiquote
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority
1.
2.
Tyranny of the majority. … It involves a scenario in which decisions made by a majority place its interests above those of an individual or minority group, constituting active oppression comparable to that of a tyrant or despot. This article about politics is a stub. You can help Wikiquote by expanding it.
The tyranny of the majority | The Economist
http://www.economist.com/node/15127600
1.
2.
17 Dec 2009 – Put differently, it is the “tyranny of the majority” that James Madison, a Founding Father, warned about. His reading of ancient history was that the direct democracy of Athens was erratic and short-lived, whereas republican Rome remained stable for much longer. He even worried about using the word …

And just to re-say it, in view of the western propaganda on Palestine. Not on the appaling conditions Palestinians live in, but on the fact that Israel is surrounded by Islamic countries whose laws you will need to search further to understand the danger for the basic human rights they represent expotienally. To state oneself as antisemit (and god know I am for no religion in particular, as they all proved to be biased in violence or in what they preach is peace. Well declaring oneself antisemit could be so good for someone wooing another creed. Not naming let see… nay maybe nothing in particular, just all of them pleading for communities to be the new or renewed tyranny.
NEWS
21/04/2017 10:48 AM IST | Updated 21/04/2017 10:50 AM IST
Watch: Mob That Killed Pakistan Student Mashal Khan For Alleged Blasphemy Celebrates His Death

http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/04/21/watch-mob-that-killed-pakistan-student-mashal-khan-for-alleged_a_22048786/

C.ET: what has been a lot cited, is not even the fact that Khan has been killed but that he has been killed whilst not evidence of him blaspheming had been found. In many sources, BBC included, Khan is identified as a faithful believer of Islam rather than as a victim of freedom of opinion, religion and political parties.
VERY VERY FRIGHTENING.

Eggland, whose treatment of the scots resembled like nothing, with their PM talking to all of them like if they were disposable infants, while concocting the referendum that would allow all politicians to sugar the back room enough to take an herr heir airplane ticket and just go out of a country that will frack, farm, milk till abrasion what is left of a dynasty that half last century made bearable, because, just because, a woman had the spectra (though we would go tired of women, even though alone), and now ready to see another man to lead the only living symbol left of a realm that stand through the universal attraction to ………….their language, not hoping their idioms.
When one thinks they have to get ready for patriarchy of the kind that do not go to war bug just marry.
Haye, hail. To v##l.
That ain’t reveal.

1. Stop believing what Muslims tell us about Islam (see Taqiyya). Instead, believe what they do, what they tell each other (see Muslim Brotherhood), what the Sharia law prescribes, and factually discern the truth about the “Religion of Peace.”

http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/sharia-law.html

Advertisements