inthenameofhumanrights

 

don’t even have a look at this post it is just to give you an idea of why you might come back for more in 2013 when i ll have time to dust and tidy that.

Please for the time being, do explore every other links and posts not marked as temporary.

Rear to protest 2

University, bigger classes, profs overloaded, no more tutorials. Students not with the skilss already in, not with a particular intelligence and way of dealing with info…

Will be in dire difficulties.

Obama the slapper bitches.

Physically as you can see one thing is moved: his mouth only.

Are you fashist asks the gansta?

Obama.

+ obama announcing crisis.

When you got on average the same expression, only changing on the rythm of others’ acclamation is that your pursuit is one.

First here are extracts of people who I study the research, as they were alone to fight back.

Having saying that I would not recommend no one of this sections as politically viable as till now I am not aware of any intention of them to converge effort with real democratisation.

I would think tha tpoliitcally the aims, under cover of revolution, is simply a reshuffling, with maybe other ways of selection, inclination. Not at the search of justice, and universal well being, but how to manage the people without them to be more than treated the same shit, unless they chant that destroy in the name of community is well done.

Bingo, just bin it. Near ring. Grin.

 

 

Incredible, a right on protest viced with complete hidden censorhip, simulated fory forum.

Give them credos credit.

“in alternative, one will find sole ‘internet?!!! alternate” , tell me my neighbor’s mate.

What do you want as ownership, the youth you are only supporting about their hunger at rioting, but surely not about their direct emancipation via working with the poorer, with the discriminate into coalition aiming at addressing pratctical, existing, investigated, haremful, harmful problems and start a real compaign, instead of that…

 

You know waht? There would be that then we couls start working together, so what’s the problem?

Well under la alternative politics it is the same old complaint campaign completing complying theirs apart, there is no work.

 

 

To claim doing it in the name of the nation, is even more pedant, even more arightomatically dangerous. It is why I think communist loses because at least with liberalism they go tthe honesty of saying they want to be the sole remaining. Communist as they are as capitalist as the others, would say you can remain if you vote the same. At least with liberals you get killed by the mafia, the bureau unofficial, not the bureau.

 

These people cofounding social and human emancipation or power, as the day the two will happily melt, it be paradise on earth and elsewhere, that cofound social and totalitarian order, that don’t know oo much abou the individuals besides the differences that the party would make in their careers.

Cariers if they were, they would make their efforts at constituting an happy ensemble and not a shushed body whose head say be happy for me.

I know that I speak idio, but even an idiot the day the y have spent years try to arrange something, however sam that small, to come to the fact that no concerns included the most serious, simple to realize ones will be tackled, the idiot that lose their hands to make something ans that aer refused their rights of not dying on purpose, the right to adapt work and needs, or refuse the duty to perform their job better than before, can smell it.

 

 

 

We hope as far as your critical study skills are standing, as it is apparently all about it, what you will remember well your diploma at uni, since as for further education opportunities are well into your ass, as soon as you would like to breathe for other thing that a total dedication to your profession (as study will be the sole luxure you will be able to pay) and at one condition, you the total devoted laron to your career will suffer redundancy if by mistake or malheur, or misery, would they start being critical of it.

Hard on notion, we hope that youwill remember well, as further education are scrapped and simply won’t be taken by teh maturity, mature student, long life study and diploma = meaning shape the market, shap e the policy.

 

 

 

Also if there is nothing left of civil that amount to destruction, so civil + destruction = what this government and mps, well comfort by what has been done before, as all privatisation of social services permitted the guy claiming being served like the bourgeois are expected to be.

You find out that in residential home, the carer are doing the cleaning for the 20 to 60 years old.

You would think, genial?

It is that you prepare, but be careful, the cleaning it is all the project around it. No psychologist, no college or centres or the ones where they teach you to behave like dummies, where the activities are so basics that you would render mad, make mad a 3 year old, if you start doing cleaning it is doing for everyone else your reward. They have been labour for ages, everything is privatised, everything is cellulised. No gathering, no even the shadows of any networks and possibility for skills and needs to gather for them to complete in harmony. The social, hateful people, where you know that you have to play disable to benefit from? The right to be serve? No the right to be handicapped, even more, as nothing constructive is at stake, to abuse our teachers or the social workers, that ask nothing but that, like that they don’t have to teach no one lessons or to find something solider, anymore.

Thousands of pounds as been spend on tiny unit that make one thing is to guard absconding child, 3 carers for 1 pupils, with what as program, fucking nothing, it is dangerous to speak there, as the child can provoke your being redundant if they decide to do the wall as you are speaking about homework. That have pocket money to buy sweets instead of sport enrolment, cultural program, professional rehabilitation or whatever will make them and their social worker participate, build a little bit of this society.

Social?  absent.

So what? So the guys you are educating like that, are the ones, the youth, that will get stronger physically, busted by this all over dripping disgusting mentality, the day food will have to be produced and shared against the ones that have always said ok to unemployment, unaccountability, work where everyone is hiding -from- any risks, responsibilities.

You wanted to be bourgeois, and banda madly now, you will know what is to sell and sold your own family to just the all body. Or maybe let’s say army, you are in general so winking to each other when it comes to put the hand in it. Better even if someone does it, don’t even ask your support, you better kill the one that would ask to think before acting towards more liberty, liberty = liberty to everyone??? What is the problem, enormous jobs, not exploitory? even for a grain of it you are unable.

And the ones talk about revolution, reproducing the same. And the others talk about serious, just wanting to finish it all. Just like a couple, domestic violence, abuses, that bring up their children like shields…but who praise the marriage so dearly or so ppoorly, in the sense that it is the prison they have chosen to live and die, just saying they are left or right for putting what, their offspring to believe they ve made some efforts, or try to challenge it.

Even the cats or the birds in the green spaces that are shrinking can feel, without all our rubbish making magpies, pig and wigs,  believe that there is some sort of lobby of study. Even the cats or the birds in the green spaces that are shrinking can feel, that it is the end of almost

And Civil war it is what is in the head of the most.

Cats and birds can feel it is c.w.

The events in London, there is no more events than the protestations.

1666, left as the solitary actions. Don’t say that there is the grass and roots, unjustice are pervarding and hwo one will say about it. The judges without juriction or for the greed make busineses, the non governmental organisation, their sole prospects is have someone withe salaries, what would they complain about, the judges are none, all that they could do is recommendations. In summary, don’t do it.

Solitary people actions. I am not saying it is good, I am saying that it should deserve big prison, but more prison for the politicians and professionals that keep everybody in this situation. It is why one should be advertising instead of secretedly counting coy coin coit costly cooish cosily  on rebels.

Nota bene, the day where I tried to speak with people or simply giving them a tiny peace of paper about tax evasion in millbank, government quarters, it looked, really, like if they have could beaten me or stew me in jail, they would have done it. Just like that, most of them reacting like if not doing it was punishable. on good practise and on governance.

Ox and sex. I wont even speak aloud these baddies, violence and salacities.      Off this for my own mental health, how many grins would think that it is the way they want it easy?

UPDATE: Good letter from John McDonnell MP in today’s paper also referencing The Spirit Level:

Haven’t the warnings been there, from as wide a range of people from Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett to Rowan Williams? We are reaping what has been sown over the last three decades of creating a grotesquely unequal society with an ethos of grab as much as you can by any means. A society of looters created with MPs and their expenses, bankers and their bonuses, tax-evading corporations, hacking journalists, bribe-taking police officers, and now a group of alienated kids are seizing their chance. This is not to condone but to understand. Addressing inequality is the only way we can avoid a rerun of these riots.

John McDonnell MP

Sorry about the good comments I haven’t read, just a few samples.

Ed35

•      In the name of human rights we’ve created millions of little monsters that are going to be a headache for a generation to come with the rallying cry; “You can’t touch me I’m a juvenile!”

 

 

 

 

we must be wary of political agenda offered up as truth.

 

• Nina wrote:

Combine understandable suspicion of and resentment towards the police based on experience and memory with high poverty and large unemployment and the reasons why people are taking to the streets become clear.

My experience of the police is that when you are stuck or in a mess, they are there for you: the police are the people who are going to help you out and be there for you.

A couple of years ago a policewoman was reported in the press saying “we run towards danger” and they do that on our behalf.

Nobody organisation is perfect – not even medicine or doctors – but we need to find the balanced view.

 

 

• I’ll start to believe that these thugs and lager fueled looters are concerned with social injustice and lack of opportunities for marginalized youth when they peaceably occupy all Uni’s demanding entrance, rather than burning cars and smashing shops to steal flatscreens.

 

thingwithwings

• Are you a student of history?

The NASDP was born of street riots and thugs. Hitler started his career by rioting in a country whose government was too afraid to enforce decent laws.

But the larger issue is one of reaction to violence in an international, a national, a city, or a neighborhood venue.

I do not see any moral principles as defined by the scope of the violence and would enjoy hearing your perspectives on this.

 

like all her previous offerings – the ranting of an earnest but woefully naive president of a student

 

• we must be wary of political agenda offered up as truth.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/discussion/user/BruceF

To all Walthamstow Socialist Party supporters,

Socialist Party

There will be a Socialist Party meeting on Thursday (usual time and place) to discuss the riots and our response – let me know if you can make it and please invite anyone you know who might be interested in the discussion.

We will be leafleting this evening and tomorrow morning to advertise it. Can you help? Leaflet is attached.

There are so far three items on the riots on the Socialist Party website: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/

Local anti-cuts campaigning

Of course there is also the libraries day of action on Saturday which is now even more important.

We have committed to doing a stall between 2pm and 6pm – please indicate what time you can do.

There will be a WF anti cuts union leaflet/statement demanding the reversing of cuts to local youth services and libraries. We can discuss what we do about this campaign tomorrow night. Stella Creasy has been serving cake to the police and commending youth workers on their contribution on Twitter – but youth facilities are being axed in the borough. We must campaign for all youth services to be re-opened. We will circulate the statement asap.

Youth Fight for Jobs

The Youth Fight for Jobs campaign is obviously very well placed to respond to the situation and has called a public meeting with the Day-Mer Turkish/Kurdish youth group for next Tuesday, starting with a protest outside Haringey youth services. We have been asked to help with the campaigning for it – here is Suzanne’s email about the plans. Leaflet is attached.

Hi,

Here is a timetable of activity we will be doing in Tottenham. Let me know who can attend when from the branches.

Below is a map with two routes of how to get to Day-Mer’s centre (I recommend the route from Tottenham Hale Station). The High Road is cordoned off by police but there is a crossing where I have marked.

The Socialist Party calls for:

• No to mass unemployment. For huge public investment in a massive programme of socially useful job creation. For decent minimum wages, pensions and benefits that you can live on. Don’t cut our public services – expand them!
• Re-open all closed youth facilities and services such as Connexions. No more cuts. Re-employ all those who have lost their jobs with funding from central government
• Invest in young people’s future. Restore the EMA and increase it. No to university, ESOL and college fees. For good publicly funded education and training as a right for all young people
• No to police harassment and racism. End discriminatory stop and search and section 60. No increase in repressive police powers

• An independent trade union-led inquiry into the death of Mark Duggan. Scrap the IPCC. We need police accountability through democratic control by local people and trade unions
• Immediate re-housing of all those who lost their homes in the riots. For government investment in mass renovation and house building, creating jobs and improving health
• Compensation for all small shops and businesses affected

• No to all cuts in public services including the fire services. Reverse all privatisation
• Nationalise the banks and big corporations under democratic workers’ control and management with compensation only on the basis of proven need
• For working class internationalism. The bond markets and speculators and the governments who represent them are wreaking misery across the world. We stand in solidarity with workers and young people in Greece , Spain and across the planet who are fighting back
• For a socialist world free from the blight of the profit motive which results in poverty, racism, war and the suffering of millions.

 

Action needed:

• Build a united, democratic and organised working class movement. We need meetings in every area to discuss a coordinated response, particularly supporting the Youth Fight for Jobs campaign
• Call on the TUC to organise a national demo urgently to unite all those who oppose cuts and joblessness and give a focus to the anger that exists.
• For a 24-hour public sector general strike in the autumn as the next step of a sustained mass trade-union based campaign against all cuts
• Kick out the Con-Dems. Build a new mass workers’ party that can express and fight for the needs and aspirations of workers and youth

Being assimilationists and fasho.

And then people don’t want to reproduce inequality, poisoning, human rights abuses and all that kind of thing, they are discriminated, put aside of the scheme. Capitalist shceme = society that have been deemed to benefit from some sort of organisation. What did the politicians expect? That we can manage to fight for or against those during our leisure time? Apparently they manage to say it officially with Cameroon, that would have for intention to recruit member of his party, like that, with people agreeing wardening for the one or two left museum, or libraries. As for organisation defending democracy, and putting pressure, do it, and I am not sure you find yourself after with a validated c.v.

Build democracy and functioning social society during our time of leisure, sure we are the people, after a week, one is not exhausted enough, it might be true for the warden that do keep their jobs for the bribe, but in general even if one is here for doing no plenty, or doing counterproductive all the same he has given its time. So we are told by the politician, the guardian of the polis, to do their jobs, while they are amassing the weapons that the police won’t be able to hold no more to protect the average citizens, while we have the possibility. To do their jobs for gratuity. Of course it shall be free, jobs are so belittle when you realize that at each level, they are counterproductive and dependent on bribery.

Even when you work for a social organisation, the day you look for it to be social you are des-hire.

Even when you work for a democratic organisation, the day you look for it to be democratic you are des-hire.

Even when you work for an environmentalist organisation, the day you look for it to be environment friendly you are des-hire.

And if a total stranger, from another planet, or someone that only keep it hope going that a human existence, a human liberty and dignity it can be, by looking up democracy, he has confound democracy and country that use the concepts, to count for it to be kept on kinda union, crushed previously, that know for sole motto. I want your money only. One would believe that working conditions are at their best, it is censorship that is, usually pushed by any way by people disinterested by the job they are doing and only interested by the time chilling and the money.

At their services?

At their service inevitably the ones that does not know, or the ones that are here to see some progression, but for that he will be seen on the regress. It work like that, there is not higher instance where complain about jobs ethics might be gathered, also no credit will be kept, no program build.

Because confidentiality is the word half the time used in order to put a barrier on accountability.

Who knows what is fucking happening behind the walls (of social services for examples that are empty with any serious, consistent program than being employed at fabricating future thugs, as I am telling you politicians are lavish for social instability, unrest, and copying greediness, unfairness, selfishness, they are social workers working for salaries not touched by what they are doing of the future generation= assisted pods just thinking of how to share their 3 pounds a day between drugs and prostitution- leisure sex for the less informed.

Because what? Because would were be a big organisation, one could, as a professional body, start saying look people have complained, you don’t do nothing, or your answer are unappropriate…

So what?

It is not a revolution that are going to happen but a civil war; and apart from the 20’s that don’t get still what it is to have a life that is hampered; or the one cited above that would like to get money and powere of terrors for a few bullets token; no one would wish it to happen.

So people cannot complain about the terrorism they experiment day after day at work.

Am I bothering?

Ah yes, let me remember, those lads in time of (civil) war that make a lot of pounds doing prohibition, or requisition, selling stuffs 10 times more expensive, as they were the only one to still have enough for their stock to be guarded…or like in the French revolution where the peasants and the clergy were being killed for finally the upper class take the dividends, allowing, grand princes, the people to con each other on liberalism principles.

How come that this government put in the pot every single ingredients that are sure to produce a revolt that would serve their looting, or an increasingly social tension, that would serve their fascism?

They want it.

Gang war.

What is a institution called the police or the politicians?

They are such thing as long as they are respected by the people.

What shall draw respect in an uniform and ever lasting way? Respect for others.

How can the politicians (the thug in their ties) selling lives and dignity; how might they be stopped?

Riots is what the politicians want in order to have reasons enough to get more and more unrestrained in the way judges wield the hammer, in parallel with the hammer of auctions.

Serving power or serving the thruth. It is wh y politicians try by all means to hid informations, whence the idea of stopping free information for higher education.

The people. P stand for short, like poisoning and positioning. It is not to say kill lavishly all what is living and don’t bring one direct money, in order to be able to poison twice as much to replace the one, one exterminates. Not it does not read this way.

Exterminates, or extremely determine. You won’t thus breathe.

Any one, as every one, after money and pretending being close to principles?

So said it is laughable, practicably it is beyond saddening, sod.

To the thugs that are reaping shops and everything, up to houses, you feel it is like civil war pointing, youwould like to go and shout, like at your own children and offsprings, stop, stop, there is still work, valuable, dignified jobs. But, gagged or hooded. Anyway the workers are working for thieves, and the hoodies won’t more than anybody rebel or have their say.

You hear the sirens, and you know that nothing is to be built in that kinda chaos.

To who profit the crimes?

To the ones that ordained and cordoned.

Uk: “children left at their own devices”.

The comments that cannot be done beyond 3 to 5 days. Ok it is nice for you to let do that, but it is not the primary function of a news papers, but   ebe honest the sole place where people can do that. the other places, it is in the other places that all is censor, and where will the information coming from, nowhere, as your journalists cannot investigate proper anyhow.

They were playing the pork, like if it was comfortable to be taken to be so.

They were more than that It was why their cine was so constant and regal.

Your opponenets, in martial arts, is like medicine, you ve got to know their injuries.

And yours

t

Many commentators are on a mission to contextualise the riots that have swept parts of urban London and other British cities. ‘It’s very naive to look at these riots without the context’, says one journalist, who says the reason the violence kicked off in the London suburb of Tottenham is because ‘that area is getting 75% cuts [in public services]’.

This 75% had to be confirmed. Firm.

These observers are right that there is a political context to the riots. They are right to argue that while the police shooting of young black man Mark Duggan may ostensibly have been the trigger for the street violence, there is a broader context to the disturbances. But they are wrong about what the political context is. Painting these riots as some kind of action replay of historic political streetfights against capitalist bosses or racist cops might allow armchair radicals to get their intellectual rocks off, as they lift their noses from dusty tomes about the Levellers or the Suffragettes and fantasise that a political upheaval of equal worth is now occurring outside their windows. But such shameless projection misses what is new and peculiar and deeply worrying about these riots. The political context is not the cuts agenda or racist policing – it is the welfare state, which, it is now clear, has nurtured a new generation that has absolutely no sense of community spirit or social solidarity.

the problem of this article is that it assuming that political rebellion did not occur but should occur to be a good protest.

I d say that the problem is that political dissent in the sense of gathering to ameliorate the community at large is not possible at work, is not possible in organisation, and alos is not possible in demonstration

Every one following the same greed shape. No higher commission, no one to blame, no one to ask, no one to ask for account. We are all ready  in cells.

This is not a political rebellion; it is a mollycoddled mob, a riotous expression of carelessness for one’s own community. And as a left-winger, I refuse to celebrate nihilistic behaviour that has a profoundly negative impact on working people’s lives. Far from being an instance of working-class action, the welfare-state mob has more in common with what Marx described as the lumpenproletariat. Indeed, it is worth recalling Marx’s colourful description in The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon of how that French ruler cynically built his power base amongst parts of the bourgeoisie and sections of the lumpenproletariat, so that ‘ruined and adventurous offshoots of the bourgeoisie rubbed shoulders with vagabonds, discharged soldiers, discharged jailbirds, swindlers, pickpockets, tricksters, gamblers, brothel-keepers, organ-grinders, ragpickers, knife-grinders, tinkers, beggars… and from this kindred element Boneparte formed the core of his [constituency], where all its members felt the need to benefit themselves at the expense of the labouring nation.’ In very different circumstances, we have something similar today – when the decadent commentariat’s siding with lumpen rioters represents a weird coming together of sections of the bourgeoisie with sections of the underworked and the over-flattered, as the rest of us, ‘the labouring nation’, look on with disdain.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/10970

then let’s talk to the labouring nation now. We are typically the one hiding themselves for having a job, thinking that whatever the hell elsewhere you will with go on with the hell in your job, at least you take a piece of the pieces.

Sometimes there is that kind of intervening reshuffle. Bon courage.

Cameron said authorities were looking at ways of stopping people communicating via social media websites if they were suspected of plotting “criminality and violence”.

Ok for what they forget to precise is that it is good them that wnat to do everything about nothing that will be under scrutiny with every one datas, political dissent prioritarilly,.

He said face coverings could also be banned if criminality was suspected.

Ok who wear it by being deeply religious? 0,0001, or maybe by mental particularism.

The rest because the riots are at the image of the present orders.

‘Culture of fear

‘We will not allow a culture of fear on our streets

No, but we fear the politicians, we fear what kind of hell they will produce again. When will be the day of total depletion when they will call us “me whores, or me livestock”

 

“There are pockets of our society that are not just broken but, frankly, sick…

No comments? He is asking better parenting skills, this pedant.

 

 

 

 

 

Security is the highest social concept of civil society, the concept of police, expressing the fact that the whole of society exists only in order to guarantee to each of its members the preservation of his person, his rights, and his property. It is in this sense that Hegel calls civil society “the state of need and reason.”

On rights pertaining to being the one of the citizens or by the “so-called rights of man” solely designating the reinforcement of the legal ruts and incentives at exerting not rights but grant to possession, accumulation and no retention, enhancing ‘bourgeois way of life’, as for example using mugs that will produce waste instead of having to do washing. Production growth depending on poorer quality of product or of poorer maintenance and/or on throwing.

 

 

Cameroon say ugly.

Speacking about people, speaking about society.

In short, they told to every body, but is whores up to the moment they sign on and on for it, like the opium taking more and more lethal injections.

He says to the people: look at yourself in what I am told to say- you my subsi(t)diary.

Sick, ugly and why not diarrheic.

Hierarchy, viral verbal diarrhoeal, oral aureole.

Ring reign on.

To ask for liberty, to ask for reciprocity in the sense that n o one want to not being at the service, but served people who don’t bring their efforts to the communities- in the frame and logics of an exchange-, or people who expect giving 1 and want 2, or even 1,1 of you.

And when you ask your due to nothing but notice than the nice atmosphere, about which each fucking effort towards which were, disappear, vanish to replace, noting, nothing, but an empty place…and face,  for the crazy (horses). Crazies.

This sympathy hiding, and ti is why it streches making arguments out of place, working conditions and rules like if the humans were a subspecies endowed with 30 of I.Q, for what ?

This sympathy holding mercy killing, murders’folly. Murderers’realm.

Again illustrate some weeks ago with Mladic, after the suspiciously premature death of Milosevic during his trial, one of the sole persons trialled twenty years after, (Shaw, 2011) for thousands murders in the Kosovo depending on providing proof that the range of destruction that have been let happen before hand will in general forbid.

It is perhaps why there is no information whatsoever or almost given by the mainstream media on the backgrounds, contexts, and precies fact during the trials reported by journalism but psychological description over the drama occurring in the court, as a room, not as a space for investigation.

Should we still hope that this non investigation stance would protect to zealous comedians and ruffians that would make fake and forges to profit from the trials and from the faillibility of the justice.

One thing is sure is that I am tired of finding good reasons for this etat de droit without rights, state of the state, an undemocraticity.

Two, Milosevic has been assissasinated in the offices of the u.n.

My girlfriend was in tears and I was in shock as I was led into custody. The man who took me down worked for SERCO, a private contractor, the same one currently bidding to run the probation service. My own probation officer was hard working and overworked, dedicated, caring, fastidious and fair. I dread to think of the plight of future defendants if his job is taken by the lazy gang of plastic pigs who clumsily processed me.

http://anarchish.blogspot.com/2011/08/day-1-going-down.html

Floozy camaroon, said huggy, and now say ugly.

When you think that the only work he has is to produce words permitting him to coit with all that will pay more…that will tear the voters open best.

Talen taken account of that, the numbers of blunders that they will have camarroon said will be the plenty then, as the bosses as to show that their foreman as just an insignificant other grovel.

Whose very words is at the menu of its own loss, fake good lay. Whose sects spells parliamentary that should be on probation impending that they do community serc services for the lack of demo, that the very people will have to suffer from their , us all? Slavery. Ecuse me to re use the words by now it is no question with the value on creativity, less still my own. I am a student that count down the numbers of lectures my working class scholarship of a profession could pay. Be paid, biped.

Not saying nothing aoubt pedo, they don’t want be so ubut to their own children, it is why the other class is to the mine sent. In waiting that prostitution, wher sheer one sexual one, be considered as the number one and sole relief available and desiralv e with a true pay.

Just still have to be a favorite.

I am not expected to be read by the intellectuals, anyhow, simplicity made complicated is too intrasequaltently

You know if I had time I would try to get what they say in utilizing literal traduction by degree. Bu t marroned discourse or other vipers whose venom don’t belong to je he, is certainly not mor e interesting that to know that daily they are coning me.

In their polite mouth, good servile to their communities, as abiding as ants to queens, bvut unlike incests, they have nothing to do with eggs hatchingthe chimpanzees.

They say the people, but my dear, people as persons are naught, inexistent, just the time for them to replace the robots as they are still not perfect. Japan;s patry, panty party.

Mind with china beside they might start wondering if elhecktronic is not the future definitely.

You ve got children but as long as you teach your children ot be faithful citizens, you are the boon in the share.

Shine is old clothes reminding what the plants do to draw cotton through. Spider spinster. Wave at, weave as the pattern of sea and skies are becoming more and more s[light].

The government is but a garrison, support? By money, corporations.

Id d why money is so reveled, as being the only weak, however weak, the only link of their assembly and discussion.

This was a very disturbing , distr ibut, experience, as in their sites they do as if people have a right to comments also I start to study in order to work on a place that publicized itself as a forum, open, intentionally conceived for discussion and reaction receiving, controvertibly, ane the sole debate you find is yes, good, I am for it…..

Yet again profieterring form from internet setting whre you cannot see people and the machinery.

They set up a group, saying that it is democratic and free, and you plhng in it, every one does it, as its title make it psychologically like if it was the possibility of reassembling everyone around a topic. The only stuff it is that it is, it may, but most of the time is own by people with a self serving interest in political matters…………

Also this site prods into the fore the how many people backing them, pms and intellectual, and as the sole people having reacted and organized I would have done the same, but maybe people could start to say were to have, instead of were to, because this being the tip, big tip, opening over an icebergs of tricks that I would start compaing against who whom backed it, and you know why as they are not supposed to know about what the site itself is doing? Because like censorship, they are less than doing nothing, but stifle the efforts pout put on by other peoples, else than already sponsorized.

Although my mind is divided as for a matter such as this, this twisted stuff was the sole on the market, god what it is that is happening. Or would people be tired of being mocked by parties, in die I disguised or openly manipulative and fasho, for coming over hoping acting and find themselves sush and belittle while others, this exact others, play the people and political = when it means still demo, heros.

Hurry, heat, harry, and lolly pop. Perhaps would one better (inner crime) to invest in creams. Sudo.

Mind we cannot expect any of them to write any of their discourse, and more amusting, to be entitled, since they did not win any title but the one they were licking, sin.  They are not entitled to put neither work nor word on what they are saying. Dolly job, this guy that talk to the residents, the commune, the citizens, in front of the whole world, like if i twas primary twa, twat,  they was scolding,

Bbc, Saturday, gang, 6 am. 13 august.

Me I think that some feminist demands that the sex be represented differently in pornographic films, more relax, more loving, more funny?? Maybe in order to pour less violence and caricature of domination into the representation of the intercourse forget two elements. One that this is still prostitutuions, and even without talking about feminism, as the guys are also have to sell their bodies and whatever manners they have to perform this intimate act (mind there is many ways to get raped, by the control of others upon one’s own body in society), making nothing but hard-on it is why it is prostitution first chief, is that act is associated with pleasure that are coming from a relation because this relation is controlled by one having money in order…that the other makes…what is in relation with chose a partner freely, a life, chosen an activity to substain one’s life, it is the pervert dependence of the private and professional liberty in view of privation of liberty by excellence.

One two, saying that pornography should be more romantic like or whatever is reprodcucing the so old orders, confer the old cowboys movies where or you can see the females drinking and laughing their head off, that when prostitutes paid (or pain) for having a little time in between torture scene that they have to change emotionally on whatever put-up drama scheme, will  have to follow this unconditional from the madam- or being vainquish and kicked no only on their pussies caste : sell dreams, sell romantism, sell exotism, sell decontraction, sell uniform, sell it selfom or else condom, sell your tears, sell the way one will come back, the surrogate night psychologist or sell what they want to hear, sell whatever they want, sell the sex, sell the love, sell it giggly eat many times, they like (it?) when the fun could make thing that you condone that, and make easier your being drunk or high, and simulate when as prostitute take 5 dicks at the same time without feeling any, trained to them, to that, you likely might.

Cat, crater

The relevance?

The relevance is to work.

As one want to make think everybody that consentent, smilling attitude at work in general is the symbole of nicety, it could well be the restraint of our autonomy, the possibility of saying no when work become no more, no less, name “or”, no else than prosti.

I d like to get rid of no more, as there is no one more than prostitution but the one that discretedly and by any means indirectly live on it .

Relevance, to relieve, reveler, leveler, rise,

Reverence, relevance,  relever, Raise haze.

Hence, enhance,

Snuff out, snuff film.

The political lack of serioius, as to be take n for no more than token. Ok?

Cop(e)

To respect the material by respect, citizen, moral, inner vaulue.

But shall we respect policies and politics then.

Theose one of wastage, that will outcry about damage of propriety, when you can see they are destroying new building….

political status and freely pursue their economic,

social and cultural development.-

far rights,

to present one’s respect to ones tools as one has to their own lifes.

The product of your work, the product of our time, of individual, personal, social, and human raison development and d’etre.

Hog a hoddy: like he would like as skin-head on his righst restiong r side

Beware of the fashisation, youth can go around, flexible and endurant as they are, but what they are growing older just imprisoned in a system without get-away. No museum, no university, no colleges opening to their ambitions or intelligence a path to a job they would praise. No one wants, even not Samantha, to have to s#ck cemery’s appendix, and the ones of all others by the same way. As nothing is assessed here and the bankers are thanked to start saying people not crooking (and bribe, prosti) deserve to be punished by poverty.

What’s on our job description:

To have voted for a system implicating the attendance of our security and knowledge and creativity and skills preservation and production to a voluntaree system, but dear nazi are you youth or inexpermimented? Whatsoever, you so lost it.

To train maturity you have to teach your youth how many drops. There they watch us using liters, pouring down poison where not one ion should be allowed, to destroy new building, to renovate and place your have to launder money in already well done site alongside river that are vomiting kilos of rubbished left for everyone’s disarray.

We life without counting how much life can take, the terrors, the horror is on its way.

How do you want someone to respect private property as it is under what you hid your monstrosity.

Am if for riot?

For what, to help the party to say that people are ugly or sucked sick?

To avance the general work of builders, that is destroy the make up mafia is from whom we get a percent.

A m not.

But what should be targeted in order to stop the plague of the people, a politics of V-ampire, empire of misery? What entity? The state, the civil society, the communities, the laws, the individuals?

Target the aime aim and maim Education? Or main promotion?

Lost, lust.

You are for the riots, an extremist, a rapist of the common good like that, needs crime, to overdo concerns about the sheer hell that is announced by this castrato. We won’t called him a racist, there is no races, only ethnies, now every knows that and then they need, the castists, all the fashos pomped into all kinda communities, the black, the grey, the bolero, and pole zero.

They need all of you that are amusing themselves bribing saying to each other you will show that we are tolerant, so take me as we are, a bunch of conning connard (schmuck)

 

 

People had enough paying for people who does not but getting along with tacit or explicit rules of destruction and neglect. Intelligence? Being put into condition for justifying the annihilation of all responsibilities, and professionalism.

Good job, blair, in french one cannot blair, have the sem smell of you, that made of this social institution the disgust of having any, as there the staff is expected to serve not autonomy, not independence, not full fledge citizens, but people on imposed restricted holidays.

 

Like in france, where you could see the skin-head preserving the ‘far right party’, but today we could have another opinion on what could constitute the ‘national front’.

Let myself impressed by hetero?

Marriage arranged not by religious sects, but by “professional” cal classes

People were fearing communism for not having belonging anymore expect to be own by the ensocialed society, but with capitalism of this kinda a(cunt) the same will happen. Die K (capital).

So what one can do in order to stop another group to enslave them?

To whatever they can get. Object to get equipped, objects to destroyed in order people cannot reuse it, and the people they use as shield, the people that serve their purposes, that deliberatedly sign a contract with them. The problem is that like in war there is innocent people and innocent, neutral presumably object that will be destroy or ill-used, as long as they don’t serve a logic of ‘just war’, a war of last resort but nevertheless emergent as emergency, in order to stop slavery- and with proportionate retaliation- do it each time those occurs? There is no fair trial mates, we are starting do think of that, as much as they say that no future.

Wars are legalised. Just wars are legal. If made lawful.

Having saying that they are not riots but lootings. Problems is that aren’t every riots to be used as loots? Against the oppressors? And then having to get rid of old friends that are greedy as the apparatchik?? Permanent revolution? So, it’s no.

To be punished twice.

To be punished to make people believe that the gib society is a big lottery sottery.

Like the lavor, labor or the  socialists they should pay twice for making believe to the people they are trying for everyone’s best. For just counting on private or personal privileges, more than the one of working, for one’s country and be pay by the hour in being protected for doing it. And if someone start saying that he want to be in pli poilitics to make someone bad, then just fire him at once.

Camaroon, the salesman, should be get rid of for inside trading, permitting bonuses on bank that are waiting for students loans and will deliver or not their wages.

You should go down.

On social emancipation.

Fashising to treat social institution as being total, the maximum they could have been would be having as aim to protect the human in general, that meant its environment its universe and there her as not having to melt with any another one, the entity specific and solo research for completit cp copmlpletude.

Compulsory.

Politics are abstract, social are praxis.

In abstract the right of man is not man, and its being social, for all rites. Writs and rituals. What would you be as a social total, preachers rewarding common coquetery?

Saying that social emancipation is total, is totalitarism.

Marx says, again and again, human not never social in his thesis, apart for the term socialist in order to illustrate the communist manifesto rising up against capitalism.

Also hinting as saying that marx say that socialism was resolved, then he was a permanent questioning advocating, an d aiming at simplified human not needs but enslavor and commander of gross artillery, is propagandist.

On censorship

Monopolistic over “public channels for the distribution of knowledge: pulpit, politics, press and pedagogy.

Jansen, s.

For who, for gthe cahair holders, you of course, die, dier.

given that you are the founding members of a group called ‘right to protest’ which despite being the main group opposing abuses against protesters and manifestation in general, destpite being in this position of responsibilities your group practises under cover of displaying overture to all comments, a draconina censhorship that should make any one talking sincerely about equality, social, peace, liberty, and mutual universal due respect desist from rallying to this commitee.

under pretense of criicizing the government that are adopting more and more a far right approach to society’s illnesses and fits; under the marxist philosophy of social entity, your stance is whose of the etablishment, however faint and shadowy.

Actually my opinions are mitigated.

Of course it is blatant that the police organisations were so deprived from guiding good demonstrators from thugging, that one can be sure that this had been made on purpose in order to ban demonstration, to make the public participating or non participating greatly afraid of it.

However some parties would have interest in riots that would clearly  being not reinstuaration of better democratic attempts and intents.

Remark: it is clear that it is of governments to make sure that parties are democratic but how to do this when one’s is not. And two you enjoy too much  dictact threats while you are the one that is robbing the eggs.

Edges of age.

I forgot everything of my past but the feeling of having lived, and instead of remembering what your body was like, it is in me that has slided its sight.

Slight see.

The play party. Trying to ban each other, as for come idea about right for th e EBD.

They are all intellectuals but suddenly ideas become blur, vague, unclear when it comes to state if someone has the right to threaten others’ individuality. What identity? Could your identity come from the fact that you want to crush the homo, the black, the poor, etc? apoliguise to all people that have to come under the same groups as other minorities. Sadely.

It is not identity but identity politics.

Means that people are ecnsuring, hating, servilizing, the complete cop and funny fair, in order, in one order, to take the reins of the first offices that came.

It is why politics will never take one of personal problem and try to tackle them down. They want to be elected for cheap in not allowing their party to show that they are for the power, undue of all establishment that fight for its own parlour beauty.

And who d like a proof about that being the case of and for all these bunches of rattling often clad in some apolitical groups but only one stuff, the money and the networks bringing it awaiting?

Because they throw grand discussion about ethics of how people should think about other people, but as to redress wrong, where are the determinations? Why then it is impossible to reassemble a group that could put real pressure if taking an injustice, it is not the injustice that are missing, missed or lacking, so?

Because these people are divided, what they want is the joystick nothing to do with let’s have a go at it. They don’t tackle the damages that societies caused, aren’t they ready for the same havoc, a cruel ruction.

Following David Cameron’s call for a sociological analysis of the riots “when the dust settles”, sociologists from universities around the UK have come together to provide an initial analysis of the riots.

The looting, discussed by some as an ironic critique of consumerism – “shopping riots” – was often more directly explained as a response to repeated stop-and-search, racist policing, deprivation, poverty, unemployment, cuts to the educational maintenance allowance (EMA), anger, and inequalities between the haves and the have-nots.

reach. As consumers first and foremost, the inability to shop made them feel unfulfilled and lacking in self respect. In some places the signs of these divides were part of the architecture around them – the upward mobility of the cityscapes of global capitalism looked increasingly remote.

Some young people hoped the government would hear the riots as a call to close the gap between the haves and the have-nots. But they didn’t think this likely. David Cameron and David Lammy (MP for Tottenham), they felt, were not of their world. They arrive by parachute into local cafés for press shoots. The rest of the time they live in a land where you get a slap on the hand for huge expenses fiddles, rather than a six-month sentence for stealing a case of bottled water. Indeed, there was a sense that things would go from bad to worse. Some young people thought stop-and-search had been stepped up and that unjust criminalisation on the streets was more likely than ever.

While the riots were to some degree about “getting paid”, they were also political responses to local, national and global social injustices.

C: getting paid about that supporting this government of vice lards = dirty old lechers?

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/sep/05/young-people-2011-summer-unrest?CMP=twt_gu

jody.

jody, don t forget you are a victim here if you were forgetting your being a victim, then you would forget to protect your right and duties to considerate the consequence of your being an activist, and a possible threat to the public security too. you have to keep in mind that in wheel chair or not they had to take into account the fact that you could have charged them.

duc

well to be honest in the case of Jody, when he is asking that if anyone thinks that a wheelchair user might be a danger to a “check point” well the answer is yes.

try to be run over yourself by a metallic wheelchair and you will see that it really can be used as a powerful weapon, a ram sort of thing.

also although i am deep with you on this issues, I d say careful mac tyre because or no one notices you of that and they might be using you; or you know it alright…and there is no revolutionary but truth and adequate.

but yes the real issue is out, they raising fees, unemployment,renovating brand new stuff to whitewash our instinct of preservation, they are scrapping human rights, arts and the critics.

we are in.

Letting people getting angrier and angi angrier.

Police not te letting message, mirroring the how uk look after their young people.

Therefore the met, the mafia’s militia.

Cuts + fear of unemployment and discrimination will encentive family of proletarian backgrounds to not send their children or not invective their children to ‘higher educationn’

This higher education that should have become available to all, in a all emcopassing sort of skills and insert at any level of your mine our complex realtion ship to reality and practises. Instead of that?

alfie

an attack with a truncheon left very, very unmistakable trace on a body – Yeah, because to come back to the truncheon story, I would take for certain that a medic would know if it was a blunt, round, of very peculiar shape and iron object or such flat and concrete stuff like a wall-unless it is on the edge of the stone, pit or what? I don’t know I am not the one of csi plus if they make that up they would not be so gross, would they?

well i don’t know who to ask but something i found very intriguing. it is about one of the protesters, Alfy as it reads [http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/apr/27/metropolitan-police-threat-protest-rights-students] had be knocked out by a truncheon while the police said that it was a concrete stuff.  {I saw the picture of his injuries it is horrendous, plus they attacked you by behind, don’t they?}

you know symbolically to knock down a pacifist demonstrators, picketer, from behind, deadly enough to cause him a stroke, tupdles (mary) martyrs, it belongs to “intellectual genocide”

when I say symbolically it is that I saw the pictures of your injury, and I say symbolically for these porky, that would not even after thousands of dead admit it  (I just paint history, even congo are not for them, holocaust yes, it is to welcome the behalf of germany)– violence addict is our people that quite frankly? Put up with it.

well i am wondering if it is at all possible for a medic not to be able to differenciate between an injury caused by something stony and probably flat and this other thing ironic, round, and to put it bluntly compare to a polished stone, still very sharp. any liking for csi? or would they argue and demonstrate that he might have been in due-tie, properly stoned?  Flintstone, flee(t)stone or street, fleet or genTeel tile. Mason anyone?

Fleece, tone or philistine.

Fleas (to say for the least) list in.

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=117219988359477&notif_t=event_wall#wall_posts

tiens, mon brave gars.

The unknown soldiers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUQEqvxdBnk&feature=related

• Hut ho hee up

Comp’nee

Halt

Preeee-zent!

Arms!

Pardon me for the songs I wanted to show you I don’t have a backbaground but with my sole writing…

I ll do send to you my best pieces, I ll do that, mean I am not to retrieve.

I love you and I don’t want this finishing in endlessness dying, what I am going to do, tell me?

I still stand for a chance, or may not be, or really ridicule?

Right to protest, and for what in practise

 

 

 

Of course to create a right to protest regarding what happened last year is certainly the sine qua non of a sign indicating that everything has not gone.

It is essential to go on this campaign in order to erect a barrier of resistance against potential judiciary abuses and injustice and in solidarity with those who paid for perhaps a disorganized or simply unexperienced way of “dealing with the police”.

I read one of you saying that they have to face the violence of the police well take my advice for granted the day a pacifist protestation is well organized is the day when one is preventing it, or escaping it, or if more terribly trapped then it is hwen occupation etc has to be dealt with serious if not professionalism, but far from being squat and extended holiday should be the object of an intellectual compaign as well as having constituting its own security, in these circumstances to record what happen, the day one can prove that the police attack without self defense, a real counter power could, if spreading the news nicely and seriously to the population, be a counter authority!

Camera are weapons not facing nothing else as it is still the rule of law, ok?

Yes, not in order to arouse them, because in real life it is still thanks to the police that we don’t go murdered, they are trained to react to potential danger, they are trained in order not to be touched. If you touch a uniform you are sentenced for twice the time because they are the representant of basic physical security in principle owe to the human.

Rule of law, it was no civil war this and nor threat of it, we cannot allow (a ford) this way.

The thing with the right to protest is that it will exercise itself when protesting, and what I think it be good to see in the perspectives of going on with the fight, would be to campaign and protest and demonstrate for the fees, and the larger problems that the privatization of the universities will lay.

Thus the movement could progress as the right of protest is still exiting, existing? and still exerting an influence when one has to protest for a cause and then to defend the beast ask for people to be committed (commuted communed), and not just random momentum that are terminated now that these bastards took it inside the party- the parliament namely. We should aim at abrogation- but not those of the people sovereignty.

I just make this comment because right to protest alone would fade away has to be protected, but in a way of practicing it, the university my dear, we have the right to demonstrate but finally being nicked, this ain’t democracy, and protestation would be that then, to say we did it, good, they nick it, bog, let’s go and have the goon up?

The fight is in the street and the day one occupies precincts is not for the living it is to challenge the paria parliament, because at the end of the day…and who said that we did not want to touch the uni, the lib-dem, if I am right.

But to organize the work is the grand thematic, don’t they?

 

on right to protest, doubling stone wihtout killing the bird.

 

 

 

 

 

 

me here is that for me is missing:

i think everyone has been victim of this at one poling point or another

you are a site, the site, of protest right in the uk because people have been beaten up in the latest demo.

They have been said to be to be peaceful and it does not take two faschists to think that is too much mate, if that really happen we will be being cooked.

But on this site there is no testimony.

I mean we got a problem with police, but we cannot do without justice, do we?

So where are the proof?

To be honest, you say it was peaceful, fine, but who I am to believe? To credit?

It does not take a lot of sympagy to think ok we have to react at this, but what this, I am to bear for you more than I do for other media?

So you are mps claiming the right to protest? Thank you very much.

But a proper job would have been done it would have been on investigating, collecting witnesses, accounte and organizing a system of recording for the next people who want to protest do that without fearing.

If we are loosing our police, we have to proof it to the population, but in writing unfactual prose on the basis of this right, that could be trunked in whatever fashion if not reported time by time, news at the second facon.

This site should be a collection of witnesses and organization for future networks ready to feature how protestors are peaceful, active politically and talking to the population not only hold bastions, and ready to defend themselves by this proof to the population that true work towards democratization is the subject of repression.

Where are the key tellers?

 

PM A threat to our right to protest

MP

You are exactly right in saying that people with family for example would be excluded from ‘participating’ and thus will render it like a “the play as a fox and hunters’ sporty game”.

Here to counteract the police the groups- I know yet again voluntaries’ energy dissolutes in no other activities than trying to survive through that ought not to be but…it would put clearly that “(l)ook, we will have to be more pacifist than the cops and forebode plan of escape, to direct the protest in order for the people to keep aloof from the violent front if there is any. It could become a very tactics reaction/action warning everybody careful gentle people, we have to train nobly.

As you know when you are young ones it is easily exciting to blurb at the incomprehensible, above all when like in London there is no culture and discipline of sport that permit youth awareness of their body, of their having to respect forces, people and materials in general.

You know protest-like use vocabulary of and are political warfare- I meant politics so let’s do it pacifically not in order to do damages- a just war type of intervention.

And about offenses?

But what about proving, is there no any witness. It is boreingly obvious that police won’t make a witness call but what about the press- because every one would fear such evidence that could be made? Right. It is why again there is no such, ever, precaustion than prevention

It has to be proved what it was and by who, but for that one need “objective witness” and who is, in a manif??

The fact that movement needs leader yes, as one had to carry the meaning of a movement for it to take and hold any significant. And we need charisma in the sense of someone who knows their fields so well that they can spread upon, whence the works of a leader, to link and to assemble, to understand the problems and the confusions and the lacks and Xenophoby and discrimination “of all kinds”(from the bbc world service program on the concert against racism 20 years ago) discrimination “of all kinds”

What I thought of these demo completely dominated by the same posts distributed industrially by party in lack of imagination therefore in lack of legitimacy?

That there were no messages, it was about money the complains that had been made.

It was not fucking about education, about information, about the subsequent way we will have to sell the diploma, because you will excuse me but I don’t for the other unis, but me I am at roehampton and the essays they correct, three correctors, good, to correct essay coming from the students home directly and when the subject is on a table they are given by the profs in advance, what kind of diploma is this? It is diploma that we will have to beg to the bank for them to finance.

They were not about a new way of thinking your demo. They were full of students and profs demonstrating for what, the banners what did they say all in all? We are talking about the demos here?

They said we don’t want cut and education we don’t give a …

“and more repressive responses, among the powers that be”.        Logics, power. Cannot hold on one elite, so? What are the rest up opt out ot to?

Just let’ hope that these youth won’t be charged for something if they haven’t committed it. And in case they have committed then let’s hope for them to do some communities services and go and clean the rivers and switch off the lights when people who don’t do it or break the law of civility- that is the tories as well as the cheerful majority of the populace- should be fined instead of counting on the counting down.

I d like you to know that alongside scrapping art diploma, the U.K has this year entirely binned the speciality of human rights programs associated this social sciences (not the legal aspect, but philo, history, socio, politics).

Please could you take a few minutes considering this information as it is horrific to understand that human rights bachelor of art single honor degree cannot be found anylonger in the whole U.K, country of the mean international language.

HUMAN RIGHTS, the only tool that are supposed to defend democracy, and that is invoqued by politicians, market, and civil society, alike in order to gain some legitimacy.

In the uk, and elsewhere of course, there won’t be any more specialists it is finished.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

. It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness. At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or — this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms — with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. From forms of development, of the productive forces, these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an era of social revolution. The changes in the economic foundation lead, sooner or later, to the transformation of the whole, immense, superstructure.

In studying such transformations, it is always necessary to distinguish between the material transformation of the economic conditions of production, which can be determined with the precision of natural science, and the legal, political, religious, artistic, or philosophic — in short, ideological forms in which men become conscious of this conflict and fight it out.

Thank you for you attention and carefulness.

If you want more detail:

In a world that d like to be regarded as democratically growing and comprehensively globalizing…

It is one of the very ‘arms’ that these people want us to give up for the profit of more laissez-faire, or better laissez aller. (meaning next time is on you the security guard, even if the only of your instruments are loose ‘polite’ letter.
very few human right university diplomas might still be found in the US, but god knows how expensive – and thus elitist and prefabricated, and per se anti human rights they intrinsically are.

Like the dubious fees demanded by some human rights lawyers, linking money – and whence economic discrimination – to the propagation of information necessary  to the benefit of human societies and peace and security as a whole;  these fees are in fact a contemptuous publicity  toward the very idea of human rights and obligations. The blatant mise-en-place of a domineering and insulting masquerade of impunity.

Loosing one’s field, like loosing the autonomy from the market tactics, a what want to be put with as generalization, compulsory assignment for everyone to accept discrimination as being inescapable- if you don’t subscribe- no entry to we let-you-live-in-the-laissez-faire- area.

The so called human rights alongside all sciences, theories and practices are dependent on this and it is why human rights are actually bearing a bad name. but at these pace, let’s hope they would still have one.

To conclude I d like to draw your concern on the fact that police beats up peaceful protestors. It is the clear sign of the end of the genuine rights of freedom of assembly and manifestation. The greatest of new is that this opportunity to voice one’s opinion is the last bastion of freedom of speech. Believe a older worker, freedom of speech cost you your job or even your voluntaree seat within the counter power of civil society, very, very, easily. Freedom of expression had just seen put down its last bastion. Let’s recall that in the uk general strikes (students, plus workers) are prohibited. It is done we are completely dispersed and ready for the kick.

On a last note, about the fees I thought the demo too much concentrated on the pounds, because if we paid the profs and all, still why not, but after uni what? Unemployment? Or having to accept to work in any kind of conditions or unethical programs.

A little more sadness, let’s to say ‘utterly terrifying’, this system will leave each individual dependent on the bank assent to grant money to start for study. It means that one can be tested psychologically, intellectually and ideologically. That means that the banks would have the monopoly on who they would like to send for qualification.

Enjoy your day.

Human rights Roehampton students are attempting to protest against the closure of the human rights single honour bachelor of Art. We are desperately trying to do so because the U.K, nonetheless transnational centre of international students and professional encounters, are closing its art and human rights programs.

Human rights, even though they attract students all over the world, obliged to come and study here, for the sake of the language of Shakespeare, human rights will be counting only 3 universities in the whole Great-Britain, where one will be able to study and specialized in them from the first year.
3 universities each one allowing a little number of students (maybe the equivalent of a big promotional classroom and profs to pursue this speciality, maybe in each university around 50 students enrolled in this speciality.
My meaning is not to bother you with human rights, but since they are the preoccupations of everybody in any kind of transactions, actions, conditions, states and this at each and every of any step, the conscience of our sciences, our S.O.S.
Is not it a bit surrealist, incredible, that  Bachelor of Art on human rights (i am not talking about the combined honour, we would be taught by specialists from other fields, meaning the condemnation to servility of our discipline, reasons, rational and pride-lead by other specialists, than human rights could only be the shadow of itself, the pretence for democracy, the apology for abuses)
Our classroom has been fcalled a centre of excellence, the second scum on earth ranked as being human rights saviours, it is no more than 100 books and a deserted asoociations of woyerus. Do not sing it, but if you want to kno w a little bit more on the subject of the so called humanrights, new religions and cultureal debat that are not that is to say but sects and sucklers for money, blood and dignity of the corrupt