On human rights not taught any more at all (a toll) as a speciality in university.

Filed under: animal abuses, exploitation, institutional abuses, row, posts on universities., thief of patrimony, university ERUDITION DEPERDITION — Leave a comment

September 13, 2011

On human rights not taught any more at all (a toll) as a speciality in university.

I d like you to know that alongside scrapping art diploma, the U.K has this year entirely binned the speciality of human rights programs associated with social sciences (not the legal aspect, but philo, history, socio, politics of it).

Please could you take a few minutes considering this information as it is horrific to understand that human rights bachelor of art single honor degree cannot be found anylonger in the whole U.K, country of the mean international language.

HUMAN RIGHTS, the only tool that are supposed to defend democracy, and that is invoqued by politicians, market, and civil society, alike in order to gain some legitimacy.

In the uk, and elsewhere of course, there won’t be any more specialists it is finished.

Thank you for you attention and carefulness.

If you want more detail:

In a world that d like to be regarded as democratically growing and comprehensively globalizing…

It is one of the very ‘arms’ that these people want us to give up for the profit of more laissez-faire, or better laissez aller. Meaning next time is on you the security guard, even if the only of your instruments are loose ‘polite’ letter.
very few human right university diplomas might still be found in the US, but god knows how expensive – and thus elitist and prefabricated, and per se anti human rights they intrinsically are.

Like the dubious fees demanded by some human rights lawyers, linking money – and whence economic discrimination, not being discrimate from economy but the fact that economy itself is innately a weapon of discrimination – to the propagation of information necessary to the benefit of human societies and peace and security as a whole; these fees are in fact a contemptuous publicity = contempt toward the very idea of human rights and obligations. The blatant mise-en-place of a domineering and insulting masquerade of impunity.

Loosing one’s field, like losing the autonomy from the market tactics, a what want to be put with as generalization, compulsory assignment for everyone to accept discrimination as being inescapable- if you don’t subscribe- no entry to we let-you-live-in-the-laissez-faire- area.

To adhere to these rules to be trained as a professional will ensure the pros to be and do that kinka of labour, sleazing and get rid of any ethics, as easy as one will have to lie to conserve position and salaries.

The so-called human rights alongside all sciences, theories and practices are dependent on this (sleaze, nepotism of and between people ok for ths same conning, will win) and it is why human rights are actually bearing a bad name. but at these pace, let’s hope they would still have one. (name, actual, present, not a vintage-wean out of whines)

To conclude I d like to draw your concern on the fact that police beats up peaceful protestors. It is the clear sign of the end of the genuine rights of freedom of assembly and manifestation. The greatest of new is that this opportunity to voice one’s opinion is the last bastion of freedom of speech. Believe a older worker, freedom of speech cost you your job or even your voluntary seat within the counter power of civil society, very, very, easily. Freedom of expression had just seen put down its last bastion. Let’s recall that in the uk general strikes (students, plus workers) are prohibited. It is done we are completely dispersed and ready for the kick.

On a last note, about the fees I thought the demo too much concentrated on the pounds (the cuts, the cuts but what about we will do with or without that), because if we paid the profs and all, still why not, but after uni what? Unemployment? Or having to accept to work in any kind of conditions or unethical programs.

A little more sadness, let’s to say ‘utterly terrifying’, this system will leave each individual dependent on the bank assent to grant money to start for study. It means that one can be tested psychologically, intellectually and ideologically. That means that the banks would have the monopoly on who they would like to send for qualification.

Enjoy your day.

Human rights Roehampton students are attempting to protest against the closure of the human rights single honour bachelor of Art. We are desperately trying to do so because the U.K, nonetheless transnational centre of international students and professional encounters, are closing its art and human rights programs.

Human rights, even though they attract students all over the world, obliged to come and study here, for the sake of the language of Shakespeare, human rights will be counting only 3 universities in the whole Great-Britain, where one will be able to study and specialized in them from the first year.
3 universities each one allowing a mockish and pitiable little number of students (maybe the equivalent of a big promotional classroom and profs to pursue this speciality, maybe in each university around 50 students enrolled in this speciality.
My meaning is not to bother you with human rights, but since they are the preoccupations (as the only barriers to gross abuses) of everybody in any kind of transactions, actions, conditions, states and this at each and every of any step, the conscience of our sciences, our S.O.S.
Is it not a bit surrealist, incredible, that Bachelor of Art on human rights (i am not talking about the combined honour, we would be taught by specialists from other fields, meaning the condemnation to servility of our discipline, reasons, rational and pride-lead by other specialists human rights could only be the shadow of itself, the pretence for democracy, the apology for abuses)
Our classroom has been fcalled a centre of excellence, the second scum on earth ranked as being human rights saviours, it is no more than 100 books and a deserted asoociations of woyerus (nothing there is to be seen but a completely emptied multi-millions-pounds building. Studies are becoming cooler and cooler. Do not sing it, but if you want to kno w a little bit more on the subject of the so called humanrights, new religions and cultureal debat that are not that is to say but sects and signed sucklers for money, blood and dignity of the corrupt.

If one argues that there is still the M.A running at Roehampton, it is denying the fact that a MA is only one year of study, barely enough to train future potential specialists! Enough tough to be placarded with the title of it.

In a world that d like to be regarded as democratically growing and comprehensively globalizing…

The very few ba:

Kingston, Lancashire, Essex, and LSE (but this one is not at the reach of the mainstream population).

After this USA and just forget all about it without green card or money.

Here are the only bachelor degrees I found dedicated to human rights studies in the whole ‘western world’. (pity yes a powerful feeling of shame, it has to be said)

Other programs are only courses or like Bircham university are not recognized by UCAS.

The other degrees are often combined with peace resolution, or humanitarian issues (US charity concept of development perhaps?) , democracrYYY or are only law (LLM) degree approach.

In a political world that champions itself as a model of civil and political rights protection and advocacy – and thus engendering a ready-made excuse for postponing or belittling the ‘second and third generations’…of rights, equality and sustainability.

In a world that d like to be regarded as democratically growing and comprehensively globalizing… as it only chance with simply surviving, the already pure loss, that make everyone wander how much wonder, no man, wounded currently would resist more the incited, flogged, don.key. petrified should one be by the results and ready consequences of us disregarding social and environmental harmony issues, there are som many irrepairable, and instead of stopping gasping in horror, we have to smile and speed up for the piles. Repair, peer. RIP

Academic freedom is about research, training, awareness, theories on practices, safe-guard, conservation of formers fights and wisdom, forums, data bases, debates, all (or a good a priori) of that is needed for hatching thoughtful measurements and policies.

Where are the social sciences and human laws being brought onto this stage?

Era, sphere of nowhere.

It is not a big, it is a gross toss suck satiety.

Here are the US university ones, but god knows how expensive – and thus elitist, and per se anti human rights they intrinsically are. Don’t ask me to say they are no good from being elitist thinking about money and deontology scrapping, in this world it is what elitists say.

Like the dubious fees demanded by some human rights lawyers, linking money – and whence economic discrimination – to the propagation of information necessary to the benefit of human societies and peace and security as a whole; these fees are in fact a contemptuous publicity toward the very idea of human rights and obligations. The blatant mise-en-place of a domineering and insulting masquerade of impunity.

A what want to be put with as generalization, compulsory assignment for everyone to accept discrimination as being inescapable- if you don’t subscribe- no entry to we let-you-live-in-the-laissez-faire- area.

These fees and prerequisites – allegiance to the capitalistic- in the sense of relations and human actions based on exploitation and abuses, that same rational enhanced through institutions such as the IMF, world bank… real and sole legislation maker (at the exclusion of the Genuine Nini 8- phonetic ally hate-for this occasion) at the UN supranational level.

These fees and prerequisites – and goals- o f making business-( accumulation of capital and opportunity, all opportunities coming out of it, and be swilled back , even glamorization for the possession of undue power- in the sense of ruining Others)- and not practices out of it, generating money not attitudes or elaboration of a constitutional (and not circumstantial, 1 odd retribution for the total extensional absence of solidarity)- framework to prevent abusive situations to occur (boosting the economy through check and balance and qualitative control, free of pollution, child pornography and animal testing for example??) – are the what of whys the very concept of human rights, the modern title to social consensus around shared well-being, advancement , positive progress and mutual respect, are bearing a bad name.

Someone talked about his disillusion about hr. ‘Believe in them after what they did to mine’ (it is right, and so his your phrase)

Give up for nothing, they are in the making, and thus will be staying.

Only a handful-size classes of human rights teachings at universities left in the completely western world.

This file in the blog to let you know that human rights bachelor degree of arts are, have been made completely disappear from the U.K and almost from the whole international resort and by extension from English speaker of this speciality.

On our dear dean, taken on thanks to her running the university as if it was a 4 stars hostels, were you see furniture all in nickel while outdoors it is the misery that they spray.

And at the beginning of the year the dean was all too joyful to announce business (every one in uk is in business and admin, did you see?) taking over the beyond mired human rights medusaed raft.

cherie blair a human rights advocate? a businesswoman with false value.

I mean the type that asks millions to pretend defend something lest than less let elite and money.

The very person why human rights are laughed and loathed by everyone included the ones that wish they were more than abject obeying fate of over the top market defect deject object.

Students adamantly for they are only students for the demo against the cuts, more and more intello frankly!

well, if you don’t want no one but student at the demo, it s you who talk fasho, on nepotism a gogo.

On practicing a campaign whose sole aim was to hold the decision making while doing absolutely nothing but meeting, and look like the defeated if nethertheless glorious elaborating team that had done everything, but so things goes. Their campaing was lying about their own center assuring it was the state of the art and a world model when it is anything but true + they never mention that roehampton university this one that took the grant in honour of human rights continuation and celebrity was scrapping the last bastion in the uk.

hoping that the retheoric is exiting though

oh exciting sorry

don’t insist on the fact that it is national penury, it could work, but cherie as an former advocate would have to blush a little more.

thanks for your support without any hypocrisie, thank you for the solidarity.

It is when you have to thank that you are a hanged man already.

Through, thank you for the reminding, the no independence nor neutrality of the instant, unsubstantiated institution – of knowledge and production –
the essence on humane. And a fuel over human. The way expected to grow and be died.

“As far as I know the university is committed to honouring its contractual arrangements with current students, full and part-time. I am sure if there is any change to this policy, you will be notified.” Anon.

In case the university would come back to before medieval. We will have to wait a little bit more for them to get rid of all their legal responsibilities.

Mercantilism.

Human rights and law? Nothing is supervised anyhow + it is lawful to harm someone as long as you say it ‘is work’ + or lawful to harm other generations + as nothing is supervised, the game is to avoid being caught by the very few and scattered rules that exist + and to make sure that the existing rules served the without mercy and whoresworseship politics and as we please we fire ya ik if you were a bundle of unearthly dices, immodest profit, immense cowardice, (hard on cow) immolate refuses and unspeakable fleece + even if you go with a proof it is then that the judges will say that it is not under its competence or jurisdiction.Socio realized that they have to take into account human rights matters in the shaping of their ethics means and purposes (approximate to what Darren o’byrne said).

This is on the remand, as human rights, permitting human resources to be managed devilish like, have been put into jail. Gel. Gelded helded holdings.

For who say that there are law degrees associated with human rights, law is only a specific area that doesn’t rule over anything more than legal judicial system (not to be confound with justice). Even when legal appropriate interventions do occur- what about human rights theories in every other domains, shapes, stages and opportunities (allowing debates not as a way of restricting justice justification but an all-encompassing way of collecting problems and solution) dialogues, structures, policies, enhancing and supervising democracy process, education of human rights- human rights should be applied at any stages in order to make sure they are implemented, not only when one can try to settle ritualised human rights breaches, and therefore to find us a blatant proof, because as for the other breach they are undetected as they are not supervised, as are under having to follow respect of others’s nothing but very restraints area and way of impeach human rights abuses, and when they are in place it is the ones that make economy work- ex pay the advocate fees while you ve already been conned to present to a judge proof that cannot be retrieved without investigation – that such investigation will never happens and that even if you have proof of professional misconduct or disfunction, or whatever else, how much want you to bet that it is the very area where judgments are completely out of jurisdiction- it is the moment they say, if at all, that they are sorry for you, they are not legal capabilities to they are not competent.

Someone talked about his disillusion about hr. ‘Believe in them after what they did to mine’ (it is right, and so his your phrase)

Give up for nothing, they are in the making, and thus will be staying.

For the campaign, one of the next questions is how to stir the public opinion, at Roehampton; and when there eventually else where?

Could you please post your remark on the taxpayer money back?

On the update about the remaining academia (= training professional persons and edifying bodies) human rights are presented:

in the expanding field of human rights: or so we are told.

There are approximately 8 (the sign of the eternity) minus 2 since they both have been scraped this year. classrooms dedicated to human rights and social sciences bachelor degree taught via the more globally representative of the international lingua franca ( english) remaining in the whole western world. Should suffice?

Students come to London from all other the world in London to get to study this program, as it is unique. Well, they were before annihilation.

Here are the only bachelor degrees dedicated to human rights studies in the whole ‘western world’. (pity yes a powerful feeling of shame, it has to be said)

Other programs are only courses or like Bircham University are not recognized by official organs like UCAS or state and public university in other countries.

The other degrees are often combined with peace resolution, or humanitarian issues (US charity concept of development perhaps?) , democracrYYY or are law only (LLM) degree approach.

Ok, University of East London has just opened a Human.Rights Bachelor of Art.to be scrapped this very year, 2 year after. Before this degree at the UEL existed but linked specially with law and environmental rights. About the content it seems that this degree is about politics and laws and is less international than Roehampton’ program is.

In other place sociology, history, philosophy are considerably less targeted and the subject is also treated at the national, local level meaning that the international political institutions are less object of studies than they indeed are at Roehampton.

I wanted to take this example to say how much Roehampton program is unique and won’t be replaced nor will the students , professors, and data it trained and get ready.

If one argues that there is still the M.A running at Roehampton, it is denying the fact that a MA is only one year of study, barely enough to train future potential specialists. Enough tough to be placarded with the title of it.

‘take a look at my girl friend, she is the only one I got.’

In a world that d like to be regarded as democratically growing and comprehensively globalizing…

Academic freedom is about research, training, awareness, theories on practices, safe-guard, conservation of formers fights and wisdom, forums, data bases, debates, all (or a good a priory) of that is needed for hatching thoughtful measurements and policies.

Where are the social sciences and human laws being brought onto this stage?

Era, sphere of nowhere.

Here are the US university ones, but god knows how expensive – and thus elitist, and per se anti human rights they intrinsically are.

These fees and prerequisites – allegiance to the capitalistic- in the sense of relations and human actions based on exploitation and abuses, that same rational enhanced through institutions such as the IMF, world bank… real and sole legislation maker (at the exclusion of the Genuine Nini [g.n standing for grande national] 8- phonetic ally hate-for this occasion) at the UN supranational level.

These fees and prerequisites – and goals- o f making business-( accumulation of capital and opportunity out of it , even glamorization for the possession of undue power- in the sense of ruining Others)- and not practices out of it, generating money not attitudes or elaboration of a constitutional (and not circumstantial, 1 odd retribution for the total extensional absence of solidarity)- framework to prevent abusive situations to occur (boosting the economy through check and balance and qualitative control, free of pollution, child pornography and animal testing for example??) – are the what of whys the very concept of human rights, the modern title to social consensus around shared well-being, advancement , positive progress and mutual respect, are bearing a bad name.

Already in blog.

This is a note, not amazing but truly amazed because of people could think that university truly needs money. And all of a sudden this year as we want to increase the fees, literally, but I know you will believe me as it is widespread costums- they have kept on changing walls, and lampposts, and sanitary, paint, wall to wall, everything of this did not have more than 6 month of existence. Stuffs in perfect condition just scrapped to pollute more and…

Mind, you d say, if they bin human rights, art and philo, one cannot wonder how they are domed not to understand the value of people, nature and objects. Like any false values, “the materialists” are in fact pissing over tools, work products, goods and histories.

hi laura, i think you might forget the new toilets (still without opening windows- mind if you breathe deeply in London street, your flesh will be chemically hurt and stop enjoying pursuit of happiness rapidly-maybe are we preserved from the fresh air coming from the outside by this way rest room are without escapatory, we could attempt to ask) in the library building all in marble replacing nothing that perfectly functioning one.

Viva the old building industry!

One of the eldest institution of the oldest job- bribery related prostitution.

i d b curious enough to check which MPs or civil servants, inter alia, by the same process have their own houses in renovation, actually.

Text about the administrators (the head of the human rights department!!!!!!!) who accepted funding from money reserved to human rights education telling us that it is a normal that they are scrapping the subject because the share holders don’t deem it lucrative any longer.

(No wonder some persons don’t see their interest in training human rights workers. It is the big plan, every one cashier for sole identity papers)

This money (namely buildings, training, and the way the money should have been given to an institution who would have fought to the last to preserve, protect and prolong human right survival: (very simple in this case, advertisement, and above all doing consciousness-raising campaigns in secondary schools prioprietarily to the subject of this all encompassing need for being the general preoccupation

I d like here (to) ask a question, to all of you.

It is about the aim of these courses, there are about human rights, mmh?

Human rights are also about democracy, it is not about the dictactorship of the majority the subject ici.

There are human rights and they are their defenders. Who are you?

I mean we risk the department closure, and there is even not a meeting.

I am not talking to the students but their professors.

What is going happen during ‘the judgment’, the kangaroo more, between the admin and you? Behind the curtain? Is it clear, cette foie-ci?

Time of the faith.

Note on how people, students this time have founded a site, taking the name of being democratic.

“save human rights at roehampton-public site”.

On the update about the remaining sites where human rights are presented:

in the expanding field of human rights

There are approximately 8 (the sign of the eternity) classrooms dedicated to human rights and social sciences bachelor degree taught via the more globally representative of the international lingua franca (i.e english) remaining in the all western world. Should suffice?

Students come to Roehampton from all other the world in London to get to study this program, as it is unique.

Uel program is shutting (shooted) also.

Ok, University of East London has just opened a Human Rights Bachelor of Art. Before this degree at the UEL existed but linked specially with law and environmental rights. About the content it seems that this degree is about politics and laws and is less international than Roehampton’ program is.

I wanted to take this example to say how much Roehampton program was in the world, unique and won’t be replaced nor will the students, professors, and data it trained and get ready.

The very few ba:

Kingston, Lancashire, Essex, and LSE (but this one is not at the reach of the mainstream population).

After this USA and just forget all about it without green card or money.

Letters to the students, that went rpaising the lords in research of fillip c.v :

Hey, sweet hearts, about campaigning, it is again (no, it is still) a Roehampton speciality.
It is one of the very ‘arms’ that these people want us to give up for the profit of more laissez-faire, or better laissez aller. (meaning next time is on you the security guard, even if the only of your instruments are loose ‘polite’ letter).

You said, let’s wait what the ‘the board binning it’’s reactions will be.
I agreed with you, I thought that the existence of human rights curriculum- the right word thank you to the person who used it curriculum- were somewhat linked with the national decision-making- whence the possibility of waging a campaign and say something like ‘protection, promoting, peace and social stability’ ‘national vocational qualification??’ i don’t know something.

Becareful at becoming expert, and having to leave in perpetual hypocrisie, as peace are treated up to the papers that are published with improvement approvals that are not human rights.

cherie blair a human rights advocate? a businesswoman with false value

Could you join the save human rights thing, and give us indication on how we could nick the bastards, excuse my violence, but i am trained and am pround of that. vous etes ma douceur cependant. droits de l homme vous etes tout ce que j’ai au coeur evidemment.

Students adamantly for they are only students for the demo against the cuts, more and more intello frankly!

well, if you don’t want no one but student at the demo, it s you who talk fasho, on nepotism a gogo.

hoping that the retheoric is exiting though

oh exciting sorry

we ought to take his car (on vandalism) or something like that, without damaging it, only to lock me in the bastille as your president.

don’t insist on the fact that there is not anylonger ba single honor in humanrights, that it is just for the roehampton ba as a token of a whimsimical luxury, like gagged, ganged king o byrne has said. don’t insist on the fact that it is national penury, it could work, but cherie as an former advocate would have to blush a little more.

thanks for your support without any hypocrisie, thank you for the solidarity.

It is when you have to thank that you are a hanged man already.

love or loot.

Comments RSS feed

inthenameofhumanrights