Archive for September, 2011



Article directly related to a council corruption investigated by the council. No way for victims or witnesses to halt them, as they are sole judges of their own actions and decisions.

Institutional abuses in health and care in London borough.

Madam, sir,

Here is an account of national scaled institutional abuses that are rampant practises in every borough ofLondon.

1:
absence of any meetings between daily carers for the 8 hours a day care, everyday, for 5 years!!! It has been happening inLondon.

2:

Service users left in complete social isolation because of unwillingness to find an appropriate centre where he could be welcome for some sociabilization.

3:

Impossible for the staff to express their concern as absence of meeting whence risking their jobs if doing so.

First, you will find below the letter I sent to a borough.

It is about someone attributed with 8 hours a day care by a borough who does not bother having any report about him.

The very stunning point is that this service user is supposed to benefit from large amount and varied help but the pluri-disciplinary staff don’t link nor share any information.

Obviously despite an in principle big team of people at disposal, this lead to a very low standard of care, as explained below.

This story is to highlight because it is the representation of what happens when several agencies or departments are involved, or more definitely not involved with each other.

I have been a carer in theukfor this past 3 years –and 3 years more inFrance-in different and various positions and I could provide you with other striking examples.

In the case of J, he is a young autistic man, deprived of clear speech and put aside of any social activities and it is why I ask you to read the following.

The point 2 and 3 roman, are very particular to this case also you may not be interested by reading them but please do read the letter and point 1.

Please if you have any questions, I am ready to work on this text or on telling this story to someone willing to rewrite it.

I wish the contents of those facts or a part of it could be published in order to alert the public opinion. I could testify they are all 100 % true, I witness them and there are proof about that.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Social care and meeting.

25/05/09

Institutional abuse:

I write to you to let you know about an absolutely revolting borough practise.

It is about the care of your service users.

There is in your borough a person for whom you provide a package of full time care and that has been lasting for years. For doing so instead of employing staff working directly for the council you delegate to a support worker agency what is surely supposed to be a subsidiary of the state or at least supposed to be working hand to hand with the borough and the professional they employ directly.

The fact is that this person’s well being depends on his carer knowledge, serious and following of daily targets and naturally the daily, weekly, monthly reports of his behavioural and activities management, the strategy put in place to improve his chance of linking with people and of engagement in activities.

The shame is that he has several carers, to whom not, even not one report on their activities and monitoring is asked and worse; though it has been years of daily work with him, not one, not even one single meeting implying his team of carers has ever taken place. Do you consider this situation as being appropriate or justifiable at all?

This was the letter addressed to the council.

Their reaction? Dismiss the agency from this particular case.

I am afraid that is no proof of that reality being taken seriously.

Of course, a part of the question is about the policy of the mere agency.

The main priority and sources of immense concern lay not in that particular case though treated as if it was isolated. That example cannot be the forgotten piece of the whole story but simply reflects the kind of no-links, no communication and not even the remotest sign of implementing one. A comprehensively mute bunch of people in charge and without any devices for having a feed-back loop system or for conveying info for a better professional practise, (and after years of having practise like that let s say without doubt, without plan nor the shades of one). The result of a dismantled depleted network it should have been for this situation went on for 5 years.

The council allows one person to be taken everyday for years, 8 hours a day, a person with very serious speech and communication impairment and therefore depending on people knowing him very well to report the way he wants or he needs things and what things to be done.

Instead of that no reports asked, not a single meeting. Like that thousands of hours of get to know the job and performing the job duties, lost.

Even in the case where he does have good carers, without detailed description of how one proceeds, if the main carer leave, the next carers will found themselves without the information that have been gathered in years of pragmatic experiments, observation and hours of practising how the service user will like and need to have people assisting him and with that.

But when you said not a meeting, actually there is.

Only for the means supposed to be at his disposal yield so little advantages:

Here is the situation-

I.

A team of one psychiatrist, one psychologist, social worker, senior carer, and several carers. One or perhaps two meetings a year.

But what kind of meeting?

Not one including his daily workers team, just like if they did not work or did not wish to have objectives while working.

Among this highly qualified persons (psy, social worker…) not one person that will wonder how it come that daily carer are not asked to give reports or to attend meeting for a then possible re-assessment of the needs, capacities, projects and targets of the very young man service user’s life and schedule.

I really like to know how it comes that all these people have readily accepted to leave things in that state. To that question, blatant facts will strike the mind.

One, they manage to pretend to assess a situation without enquiring about the daily happenings or non-happenings which is supposed to be the basis of all decisions and which will have a conclusive effect on everyone else’s deeds towards the life of the service user. . For every case it is the case but this man is deprived of speech, plus when you send people for 8 hours shifts you expect them to do something somewhat intelligible with it.

Two, whereas psychologists, social worker team should try to assess a situation with the purpose of improving or adjusting this situation, the fact is that they don’t try to check out what difficulties his only carers

(and only person who are in real contact with himmay come across with. Check on their possible, better put, advisable-should-be-compulsorily-requested questions, claims, projects, strategies, differences, techniques, and if any work done during these 8 daily hours, their practices.

These person who are supposed to look after the well being of a person just don’t ask for any records about what the only staff that are in interaction with that person do.

This fact underlines that they are supposed to assess the life conditions of an individual about whom they know nothing, and about whom they don’t try to ask anything.

There is no pluri disciplinarity team, whereas the taxpayer pays for one and is told that there is. There are several people, agencies who work but do not team up. Who absolutely does not bother about the hackneyed notion from the nvq 1 health and care of the holistic approach.

A team of staff left without aims, without objectives and assessment of their jobs.

A service user file thus life management and planning without the latter are meant to say ‘no future’.

To what everything in place there is not a single attempt at verifying, gathering, assessing, compiling information nor the will of having that.

That is to say there is no way of checks and balances, the basis of democratic system has to provide an info and grievance canal.

Nothing checked; nothing shared.

.

Nb: It is useless to add that this absence of any checking is open-door to abuse among staff, or hierarchic, towards the service user, or abuse of the time or the means put at disposal.

Three, it is just common doing, and implicitly better for each one not to make comment on anything in a clog.

 

II.       

 

This young man has been discarded from the system as a whole.

His health condition has for effect him not to be able to stay in place where there is noise.

This young man is ‘barred’ from having any kind of social grouping due to this sensitivity to excessive noise, as the same council has been enable to find for him a place- when you think this is actually happening in London-, a centre where he could have regular encounters with someone else than his carers.

The carers will find themselves being given the schedule of an outcast, with no socialising place in his timetable, taking the pretence that he needs somewhere quiet to feel well, he is left on his own, like if you could not find or even make up a quiet group for people who need quietness to enjoy their time.

With will and cooperation this would be easy to find and to eventually enable J to have at least a weekly meeting where he can meet people instead of none a year he has been imposed with.

 

 

In conclusion he is left with only his team of carers, to whom he is totally dependent as for his goings and comings, and all activities, or any sort or planning they will offer. The same people to whom no one asks what they do, how they practise, or to hand out their reflective accounts; and the same people that are left on their own without support, nor objectives.

He is left with not other encounters.

 

 

 

III.       

 

In parallel if you got a problem – violence or abuse in the surrounding of this person or among the professionals, or if the person you look after is subjected to abuses…without the network of a pluri-disciplinary team (it would take two meetings a year, some forms, and shared reports), are you supposed to rely on telling the social services, that demonstrates on that they just don’t talk in any case about what happens in the actual service users’ care.

Because this case has been reported and what they did was to suspend everyone, like if it was a surprise to them that family and team of workers endure problems if they are left cut from other places. Sometimes unsolvable, often leading to the wearing of motivation – one cannot be the only one in the village- stop doing of activities or of their coherence or of their relevance to the need of the service user that without detailed writings will stay unknown, no thinkable continuity to it (there are nonexistent),  nothing about what have been done. And about the endorsement of one’s responsibilities? There is no more frameworks and a general fear of taking initiatives since the support and surrounding coming from higher is at zero. This type of organisations always leading to isolation and the impossibility of using the resources needed to render comprehensive care. Dignity.

Like if they were surprised by the absence of this meeting whereas they are the one not asking for any.

Like if it was the fault of the workers that dare pointing out this fact.

Like if it was the fault of the agency who are only what they are taken from, a commercial, administrative, logistic, company who merely applies the rules that the very same council ask them to follow.

Provide me with temporary, no-unionised, cheaper, got-riddable-of-at-will-without-contrat-nor-the-inch-of-a-view-inside-the-pyramid (5 years they have been relying on temporary workers for the same job with exactly the same type of care and schedule, not an inch of change, nor the perspective of doing it). Be happy taxpayer, twice as much expensive these temporary agencies, spare our administrators the burden of the responsibilities, of the feed-back to their staff, of a file that is supposed to be filled, gathered, shared and read.

I report that to the council. I had not choice. I wanted to complain about the council but when I went to the government site, they say that if you want to complain about the council then you have to write to the council! How is that possible? Not in a democracy.

It is not an isolated case, just a mistake, an oversight. It is sheer common implementation, professional customs, organisational cordiale entente, systematic arrangement; oblivion.

It is institutional abuse.

The council suspended the staff of the agency that take on them, like if it was the problem.

They suspended the team, not responsible for not having no one to talk, no one who are here for supervise, advise, collect, put further, forward…

They treat the temporary worker like inexistent and when they voice the problems of not being able to link with anybody, they give you the sack.

Madam, sir, sorry about this, I admit, a bit long and heavy description of what is to find inside the thick walls of our institutions, but just a reminder- here described a council job.

No one checks, no one assesses, (those are a very widespread, endemic everywhere happening, but at least in some places they provide to fill up a form that gives you a chance to whistle blowing).

No grievances procedures, no help, no security.

The game was clear. If you speak, they remove you. So what do you do if you need the job?

More vicious than that, no one needs a job in particular but something you desperately need is references.

You may work very satisfactorily for two years with you boss, if the 25th month he decides you have been a rubbish the way long it is what he may just decide to begin saying.

You don’t possess, it should be compulsorily given, here in theukit is forbidden to ask for it, a regular overview. A say quarterly appreciation of your work by your manager, attestation by what you may appreciate that you cannot work anymore for a person that don’t give you good references, or improve your practise if the comments are justified or by what you are sure that if someone say you are a good worker one month he won’t be totally allow to say that you are inadequate the days you are not anymore in his books.

Also if you spot abuses, don’t report it because who is gonna give you or not access to another jobs afterwards, you former boss.

The system of reference! A lock-up system.

elevatwell-all@yahoo.co.uk

Advertisements

Council unable to compil social organisations. They don’t know-they don’t do nothing on the subject, abject.

Letter in order to find activities for a young ‘autistic’ person that is forbidden (not authorized) by his parents (like if when you are of an age you had still to rely on your parents good will!!- the social system is a prison that loves itself as so being) to take any medication to calm its tremendously strong and overwhelming anxiety. Because of this he cannot socialize with anyone, and has to rely on two carers to be all the time with him, instead of participating in a life of a centre where he could find other people and activities…

Mind these centres when existing are of shrinking size and skills teachings.

Centers but for enter??

Anyhow if you ask the council they don’t know nothing about that. I ask his own social worker, as I was only a support worker, I ask other social offices. No one can tell me where and what has been planned and constructed and organised in order to fulfil this society’s administrative, organisational, managerial, social tasks and responsibility.

Here a description of what effect of having no recourse to medication (am not for medication, as treatment should be of another nature, included changing the environmental lack of flexibility causing people to have to fear social, professional, individual, solo or collective or any activities.

I am c.b, one of the junior carer of Mr C.J

Mr C.J lives in Hammersmith  and  Fulham borough.

I want to contact someone in order to try to begin new activities with J.

J has got a few activities during the week while he beneficiates from support worker every day.

He has therapy session, a lot of walk and swimming.

If I try to contact you now it is because I would need advice from you.

The problem on his schedule is that besides his carers and family, this 23 year old young man have never the opportunity for socialising with people through activities.

J’s particularity is that he has challenging behaviour. Nevertheless he is in general a very nice person.

The problem is that J’s crisis is trigger mostly by noises.

We are able with J when he shows signs of decontraction (relaxation) and outgoing, to for example go and have lunch in restaurant or go to museums. But socialisation in a ‘main stream’ group is difficult to consider doing because of his ‘learning disabilities’.

Besides, on Friday we go to a center for autistic adults but there the problem is that even if J wants to participate and to meet people, that is impossible because if, say he d like to sit near someone quietly at a table, one noise or quickly move (running, agitation, moaning, screaming, waving) and J goes as far away as he could, often himself being in crise afterwards.

Due to that situation, and due to the fact that because of that j is left without other relationships than carers and parents, I d like to know which groups, organisations, residences…you could recommend me with which Jcould meet for lunch for example a little group of people without him having to fear the type of challenging described above and thus starting meeting people outside the circle of his carers.

Thank you for you attention.

Looking forward hearing from you.


On human rights not taught any more at all (a toll) as a speciality in university.

I d like you to know that alongside scrapping art diploma, the U.K has this year entirely binned the speciality of  human rights programs associated with social sciences (not the legal aspect, but philo, history, socio, politics of it).

Please could you take a few minutes considering this information as it is horrific to understand that human rights bachelor of art single honor degree cannot be found anylonger in the whole U.K, country of the mean international language.

HUMAN RIGHTS, the only tool that are supposed to defend democracy, and that is invoqued by politicians, market, and civil society, alike in order to gain some legitimacy.

In the uk, and elsewhere of course, there won’t be any more specialists it is finished.

Thank you for you attention and carefulness.

If you want more detail:

In a world that d like to be regarded as democratically growing and comprehensively globalizing…

It is one of the very ‘arms’ that these people want us to give up for the profit of more laissez-faire, or better laissez aller. Meaning next time is on you the security guard, even if the only of your instruments are loose ‘polite’ letter.
very few human right university diplomas might still be found in the US, but god knows how expensive – and thus elitist and prefabricated, and per se anti human rights they intrinsically are.

Like the dubious fees demanded by some human rights lawyers, linking money – and whence economic discrimination, not being discrimate from economy but the fact that economy itself is innately a weapon of discrimination  – to the propagation of information necessary  to the benefit of human societies and peace and security as a whole;  these fees are in fact a contemptuous publicity = contempt  toward the very idea of human rights and obligations. The blatant mise-en-place of a domineering and insulting masquerade of impunity.

Loosing one’s field, like losing the autonomy from the market tactics, a what want to be put with as generalization, compulsory assignment for everyone to accept discrimination as being inescapable- if you don’t subscribe- no entry to we let-you-live-in-the-laissez-faire- area.

To adhere to these rules to be trained as a professional will ensure the pros to be and do that kinka of labour, sleazing and get rid of any ethics, as easy as one will have to lie to conserve position and salaries.

The so-called human rights alongside all sciences, theories and practices are dependent on this (sleaze, nepotism of and between people ok for ths same conning, will win)  and it is why human rights are actually bearing a bad name. but at these pace, let’s hope they would still have one. (name, actual, present, not a vintage-wean out of whines)

To conclude I d like to draw your concern on the fact that police beats up peaceful protestors. It is the clear sign of the end of the genuine rights of freedom of assembly and manifestation. The greatest of new is that this opportunity to voice one’s opinion is the last bastion of freedom of speech. Believe a older worker, freedom of speech cost you your job or even your voluntary seat within the counter power of civil society, very, very, easily. Freedom of expression had just seen put down its last bastion. Let’s recall that in the uk general strikes (students, plus workers) are prohibited. It is done we are completely dispersed and ready for the kick.

On a last note, about the fees I thought the demo too much concentrated on the pounds (the cuts, the cuts but what about we will do with or without that), because if we paid the profs and all, still why not, but after uni what? Unemployment? Or having to accept to work in any kind of conditions or unethical programs.

A little more sadness, let’s to say ‘utterly terrifying’, this system will leave each individual dependent on the bank assent to grant money to start for study. It means that one can be tested psychologically, intellectually and ideologically. That means that the banks would have the monopoly on who they would like to send for qualification.

Enjoy your day.

Human rights Roehampton students are attempting to protest against the closure of the human rights single honour bachelor of Art. We are desperately trying to do so because the U.K, nonetheless transnational centre of international students and professional encounters, are closing its art and human rights programs.

Human rights, even though they attract students all over the world, obliged to come and study here, for the sake of the language of Shakespeare, human rights will be counting only 3 universities in the whole Great-Britain, where one will be able to study and specialized in them from the first year.
3 universities each one allowing a mockish and pitiable little number of students (maybe the equivalent of a big promotional classroom and profs to pursue this speciality, maybe in each university around 50 students enrolled in this speciality.
My meaning is not to bother you with human rights, but since they are the preoccupations (as the only barriers to gross abuses) of everybody in any kind of transactions, actions, conditions, states and this at each and every of any step, the conscience of our sciences, our S.O.S.
Is it not a bit surrealist, incredible, that  Bachelor of Art on human rights (i am not talking about the combined honour, we would be taught by specialists from other fields, meaning the condemnation to servility of our discipline, reasons, rational and pride-lead by other specialists human rights could only be the shadow of itself, the pretence for democracy, the apology for abuses)
Our classroom has been fcalled a centre of excellence, the second scum on earth ranked as being human rights saviours, it is no more than 100 books and a deserted asoociations of woyerus (nothing there is to be seen but a completely emptied multi-millions-pounds building. Studies are becoming cooler and cooler. Do not sing it, but if you want to kno w a little bit more on the subject of the so called humanrights, new religions and cultureal debat that are not that is to say but sects and signed sucklers for money, blood and dignity of the corrupt.

If one argues that there is still the M.A running at Roehampton, it  is denying the fact that a MA  is only one year of study, barely enough to train future potential specialists! Enough tough to be placarded with the title of it.

In a world that d like to be regarded as democratically growing and comprehensively globalizing…

The very few ba:

Kingston, Lancashire, Essex, and LSE (but this one is not at the reach of the mainstream population).

After this USA and just forget all about it without green card or money.

Here are the only bachelor degrees I found dedicated to human rights studies in the whole ‘western world’. (pity yes a powerful feeling of shame, it has to be said)

Other programs are only courses or like Bircham university are not recognized by UCAS.

The other degrees are often combined with peace resolution, or humanitarian issues (US charity concept of development perhaps?) , democracrYYY or are only law (LLM) degree approach.

In a political world that champions itself as a model of civil and political rights protection and advocacy – and thus engendering a ready-made excuse for postponing or belittling the ‘second  and third generations’…of rights, equality and sustainability.

In a world that d like to be regarded as democratically growing and comprehensively globalizing… as it only chance with simply surviving, the already pure loss, that make everyone wander how much wonder, no man, wounded currently would resist more the incited, flogged, don.key. petrified should one be by the results and ready consequences of us disregarding social and environmental harmony issues, there are som many irrepairable, and instead of stopping gasping in horror, we have to smile and speed up for the piles. Repair, peer. RIP

Academic freedom is about research, training, awareness, theories on practices, safe-guard, conservation of formers fights and wisdom, forums, data bases, debates, all (or a good a priori) of that is needed for hatching thoughtful measurements and policies.

Where are the social sciences and human laws being brought onto this stage?

Era, sphere of nowhere.

It is not a big, it is a gross toss suck satiety.

Here are the US university ones, but god knows how expensive – and thus elitist, and per se anti human rights they intrinsically are. Don’t ask me to say they are no good from being elitist thinking about money and deontology scrapping, in this world it is what elitists say.

Like the dubious fees demanded by some human rights lawyers, linking money – and whence economic discrimination – to the propagation of information necessary  to the benefit of human societies and peace and security as a whole;  these fees are in fact a contemptuous publicity  toward the very idea of human rights and obligations. The blatant mise-en-place of a domineering and insulting masquerade of impunity.

A what want to be put with as generalization,  compulsory assignment for everyone to accept discrimination as being inescapable- if you don’t subscribe- no entry to we let-you-live-in-the-laissez-faire- area.

These fees and prerequisites – allegiance to the capitalistic- in the sense of relations and human actions based on  exploitation and abuses, that same rational enhanced through  institutions such as the IMF, world bank… real and sole legislation maker  (at the exclusion of the Genuine Nini  8- phonetic ally hate-for this occasion) at the UN supranational level.

These fees and prerequisites – and goals- o f making  business-( accumulation of capital and opportunity, all opportunities coming  out of it, and be swilled back , even glamorization for the possession of  undue power- in the sense of ruining Others)-  and not practices out of it, generating money not attitudes or elaboration of a constitutional (and not circumstantial, 1 odd retribution for the total extensional absence of solidarity)-  framework to prevent abusive situations to occur (boosting the economy through check and balance and qualitative control, free of pollution, child pornography  and animal testing for example??) –  are the what of whys the very concept of human rights, the modern title to social consensus around shared well-being,  advancement , positive progress and mutual respect, are bearing a bad name.

Someone talked about his disillusion about hr. ‘Believe in them after what they did to mine’ (it is right, and so his your phrase)

Give up for nothing, they are in the making, and thus will be staying.

Only a handful-size classes of human rights teachings at universities left in the completely western world.

This file in the blog to let you know that human rights bachelor degree of arts are, have been made completely disappear from the U.K and almost from the whole international resort and by extension from English speaker of this speciality.

On our dear dean, taken on thanks to her running the university as if it was  a 4 stars hostels, were you see furniture all in nickel while outdoors it is the misery that they spray.

And at the beginning of the year the dean was all too joyful to announce business (every one in uk is in business and admin, did you see?) taking over the beyond mired human rights medusaed raft.

cherie blair a human rights advocate? a businesswoman with false value.

I mean the type that asks millions to pretend defend something lest than less let elite and money.

The very person why human rights are laughed and loathed by everyone included the ones that wish they were more than abject obeying fate of over the top market defect deject object.

Students adamantly for they are only students for the demo against the cuts, more and more intello frankly!

well, if you don’t want no one but student at the demo, it s you who talk fasho, on nepotism a gogo.

On practicing a campaign whose sole aim was to hold the decision making while doing absolutely nothing but meeting, and look like the defeated if nethertheless glorious elaborating team that had done everything, but so things goes. Their campaing was lying about their own center assuring it was the state of the art and a world model when it is anything but true + they never mention that roehampton university this one that took the grant in honour of human rights continuation and celebrity was scrapping the last bastion in the uk.

hoping that the retheoric is exiting though

oh exciting sorry

don’t insist on the fact that it is national penury, it could work, but cherie as an former advocate would have to blush a little more.

thanks for your support without any hypocrisie, thank you for the solidarity.

It is when you have to thank that you are a hanged man already.

Through, thank you for the reminding, the no independence nor neutrality of the instant, unsubstantiated institution – of knowledge and production –
the essence on humane. And a fuel over human. The way expected to grow and be died.

“As far as I know the university is committed to honouring its contractual arrangements with current students, full and part-time. I am sure if there is any change to this policy, you will be notified.” Anon.

In case the university would come back to before medieval. We will have to wait a little bit more for them to get rid of all their legal responsibilities.

Mercantilism.

Human rights and law? Nothing is supervised anyhow + it is lawful to harm someone as long as you say it ‘is work’ + or lawful to harm other generations + as nothing is supervised, the game is to avoid being caught by the very few and scattered rules that exist + and to make sure that the existing rules served the without mercy and whoresworseship politics and as we please we fire ya ik if you were a bundle of unearthly dices, immodest profit, immense cowardice, (hard on cow) immolate refuses and unspeakable fleece + even if you go with a proof it is then that the judges will say that it is not under its competence or jurisdiction.Socio realized that they have to take into account human rights matters in the shaping of their ethics means and purposes (approximate to what Darren o’byrne said).

This is on the remand, as human rights, permitting human resources to be managed devilish like, have been put into jail. Gel. Gelded helded holdings.

For who say that there are law degrees associated with human rights, law is only a specific area that doesn’t rule over anything more than legal judicial system (not to be confound with justice). Even  when legal appropriate interventions do occur- what about human rights theories in every other domains, shapes, stages and opportunities (allowing debates not as a way of restricting justice justification but an all-encompassing way of collecting problems and solution) dialogues, structures, policies, enhancing and supervising democracy process, education of human rights- human rights should be applied at any stages in order to make sure they are implemented, not only when one can try to settle ritualised human rights breaches, and therefore to find us a blatant proof, because as for the other breach they are undetected as they are not supervised, as are under having to follow respect of others’s nothing but very restraints area and way of impeach human rights abuses, and when they are in place it is the ones that make economy work- ex pay the advocate fees while you ve already been conned to present to a judge proof that cannot be retrieved without investigation – that such investigation will never happens and that even if you have proof of professional misconduct or disfunction, or whatever else, how much want you to bet that it is the very area where judgments are completely out of jurisdiction- it is the moment they say, if at all, that they are sorry for you, they are not legal capabilities to they are not competent.

Someone talked about his disillusion about hr. ‘Believe in them after what they did to mine’ (it is right, and so his your phrase)

Give up for nothing, they are in the making, and thus will be staying.

For the campaign, one  of the next questions is how to stir the public opinion, at Roehampton; and when there eventually else where?

Could you please post your remark on the taxpayer money back?

 

On the update about the remaining academia (= training professional persons and edifying bodies) human rights are presented:

in the expanding field of human rights: or so we are told.

There are approximately 8 (the sign of the eternity) minus 2 since they both have been scraped this year. classrooms dedicated to human rights and social sciences bachelor degree taught via the more globally representative of the international lingua franca ( english) remaining in the whole western world. Should suffice?

Students come to London from all other the world in London to get to study this program, as it is unique. Well, they were before annihilation.

Here are the only bachelor degrees dedicated to human rights studies in the whole ‘western world’. (pity yes a powerful feeling of shame, it has to be said)

Other programs are only courses or like Bircham University are not recognized by official organs like UCAS or state and public university in other countries.

The other degrees are often combined with peace resolution, or humanitarian issues (US charity concept of development perhaps?) , democracrYYY or are law only  (LLM) degree approach.

Ok, University of East London has just opened a Human.Rights Bachelor of Art.to be scrapped this very year, 2 year after. Before this degree at the UEL existed  but linked specially with law and environmental rights. About the content it seems that this degree is about politics and laws and is less international than Roehampton’ program is.

In other place sociology, history, philosophy are considerably less targeted and  the subject is also treated at the national, local level meaning that the international political institutions are less object of studies than they indeed are at Roehampton.

I wanted to take this example to say how much Roehampton program is unique and won’t be replaced nor will the students , professors, and data it trained and get ready.

If one argues that there is still the M.A running at Roehampton, it  is denying the fact that a MA  is only one year of study, barely enough to train future potential specialists. Enough tough to be placarded with the title of it.

‘take a look at my girl friend, she is the only one I got.’

In a political world that champions itself as a model of civil and political rights protection and advocacy – and thus engendering a ready-made excuse for postponing or belittling the ‘second  and third generations’

In a world that d like to be regarded as democratically growing and comprehensively globalizing…

Academic freedom is about research, training, awareness, theories on practices, safe-guard, conservation of formers fights and wisdom, forums, data bases, debates, all (or a good a priory) of that is needed for hatching thoughtful measurements and policies.

Where are the social sciences and human laws being brought onto this stage?

Era, sphere of nowhere.

Here are the US university ones, but god knows how expensive – and thus elitist, and per se anti human rights they intrinsically are.

Like the dubious fees demanded by some human rights lawyers, linking money – and whence economic discrimination – to the propagation of information necessary  to the benefit of human societies and peace and security as a whole;  these fees are in fact a contemptuous publicity  toward the very idea of human rights and obligations. The blatant mise-en-place of a domineering and insulting masquerade of impunity.

A what want to be put with as generalization,  compulsory assignment for everyone to accept discrimination as being inescapable- if you don’t subscribe- no entry to we let-you-live-in-the-laissez-faire- area.

These fees and prerequisites – allegiance to the capitalistic- in the sense of relations and human actions based on  exploitation and abuses, that same rational enhanced through  institutions such as the IMF, world bank… real and sole legislation maker  (at the exclusion of the Genuine Nini [g.n standing for grande national]  8- phonetic ally hate-for this occasion) at the UN supranational level.

These fees and prerequisites – and goals- o f making  business-( accumulation of capital and opportunity out of it , even glamorization for the possession of  undue power- in the sense of ruining Others)-  and not practices out of it, generating money not attitudes or elaboration of a constitutional (and not circumstantial, 1 odd retribution for the total extensional absence of solidarity)-  framework to prevent abusive situations to occur (boosting the economy through check and balance and qualitative control, free of pollution, child pornography  and animal testing for example??) –  are the what of whys the very concept of human rights, the modern title to social consensus around shared well-being,  advancement , positive progress and mutual respect, are bearing a bad name.

Already in blog.

This is a note, not amazing but truly amazed because of people could think that university truly needs money. And all of a sudden this year as we want to increase the fees, literally, but I know you will believe me as it is widespread costums- they have kept on changing walls, and lampposts, and sanitary, paint, wall to wall, everything of this did not have more than 6 month of existence. Stuffs in perfect  condition just scrapped to pollute more and…

Mind, you d say, if they bin human rights, art and philo, one cannot wonder how they are domed not to understand the value of people, nature and objects. Like any false values, “the materialists” are in fact pissing over tools, work products, goods and histories.

 

 

hi laura, i think you might forget the new toilets (still without opening windows- mind if you breathe deeply in London street, your flesh will be chemically hurt and stop enjoying pursuit of happiness rapidly-maybe are we preserved from the fresh air coming from the outside by this way rest room are without escapatory, we could attempt to ask) in the library building all in marble replacing nothing that perfectly functioning one.

Viva the old building industry!

One of the eldest institution of the oldest job- bribery related prostitution.

i d b curious enough to check which MPs or civil servants, inter alia, by the same process have their own houses in renovation, actually.

Text about the administrators (the head of the human rights department!!!!!!!) who accepted funding from money reserved to human rights education telling us that it is a normal  that they are scrapping the subject because the share holders don’t deem it lucrative any longer.

(No wonder some persons don’t see their interest in training human rights workers. It is the big plan, every one cashier for sole identity papers)

This money (namely buildings, training, and the way the money should have been given to an institution who would have fought to the last to preserve, protect and prolong human right survival: (very simple in this case, advertisement, and above all doing consciousness-raising campaigns in secondary schools prioprietarily to the subject of this all encompassing need for being the general preoccupation

 

 

I d like here (to) ask a question, to all of you.

It is about the aim of these courses, there are about human rights, mmh?

Human rights are also about democracy, it is not about the dictactorship of the majority the subject ici.

There are human rights and they are their defenders. Who are you?

I mean we risk the department closure, and there is even not a meeting.

I am not talking to the students but their professors.

What is going happen during ‘the judgment’, the kangaroo more, between the admin and you? Behind the curtain? Is it clear, cette foie-ci?

Time of the faith.

 

 

Note on how people, students this time have founded a site, taking the name of being democratic.

“save human rights at roehampton-public site”.

On the update about the remaining sites where human rights are presented:

in the expanding field of human rights

There are approximately 8 (the sign of the eternity) classrooms dedicated to human rights and social sciences bachelor degree taught via the more globally representative of the international lingua franca (i.e english) remaining in the all western world. Should suffice?

Students come to Roehampton from all other the world in London to get to study this program, as it is unique.

Uel program is shutting (shooted) also.

Ok, University of East London has just opened a Human Rights Bachelor of Art. Before this degree at the UEL existed  but linked specially with law and environmental rights. About the content it seems that this degree is about politics and laws and is less international than Roehampton’ program is.

In other place sociology, history, philosophy are considerably less targeted and  the subject is also treated at the national, local level meaning that the international political institutions are less object of studies than they indeed are at Roehampton.

I wanted to take this example to say how much Roehampton program was in the world, unique and won’t be replaced nor will the students, professors, and data it trained and get ready.

If one argues that there is still the M.A running at Roehampton, it  is denying the fact that a MA  is only one year of study, barely enough to train future potential specialists. Enough tough to be placarded with the title of it.

The very few ba:

Kingston, Lancashire, Essex, and LSE (but this one is not at the reach of the mainstream population).

After this USA and just forget all about it without green card or money.

Letters to the students, that went rpaising the lords in research of fillip c.v :

Hey, sweet hearts, about campaigning, it is again (no, it is still) a Roehampton speciality.
It is one of the very ‘arms’ that these people want us to give up for the profit of more laissez-faire, or better laissez aller. (meaning next time is on you the security guard, even if the only of your instruments are loose ‘polite’ letter).

You said, let’s wait what the ‘the board binning it’’s reactions will be.
I agreed with you, I thought that the existence of human rights curriculum- the right word thank you to the person who used it curriculum- were somewhat linked with the national decision-making- whence the possibility of waging a campaign and say something like ‘protection, promoting, peace and social stability’ ‘national vocational qualification??’ i don’t know something.

Becareful at becoming expert, and having to leave in perpetual hypocrisie, as peace are treated up to the papers that are published with improvement approvals that are not human rights.

cherie blair a human rights advocate? a businesswoman with false value

Could you join the save human rights thing, and give us indication on how we could nick the bastards, excuse my violence, but i am trained and am pround of that. vous etes ma douceur cependant. droits de l homme vous etes tout ce que j’ai au coeur evidemment.

Students adamantly for they are only students for the demo against the cuts, more and more intello frankly!

well, if you don’t want no one but student at the demo, it s you who talk fasho, on nepotism a gogo.

On practicing a campaign whose sole aim was to hold the decision making while doing absolutely nothing but meeting, and look like the defeated if nethertheless glorious elaborating team that had done everything, but so things goes. Their campaing was lying about their own center assuring it was the state of the art and a world model when it is anything but true + they never mention that roehampton university this one that took the grant in honour of human rights continuation and celebrity was scrapping the last bastion in the uk.

hoping that the retheoric is exiting though

oh exciting sorry

we ought to take his car (on vandalism) or something like that, without damaging it, only to lock me in the bastille as your president.

don’t insist on the fact that there is not anylonger ba single honor in humanrights, that it is just for the roehampton ba as a token of a whimsimical luxury, like gagged, ganged king o byrne has said. don’t insist on the fact that it is national penury, it could work, but cherie as an former advocate would have to blush a little more.

thanks for your support without any hypocrisie, thank you for the solidarity.

It is when you have to thank that you are a hanged man already.

love or loot.


Add info on roe save the world and h.r (human rights) condition 2.

I d like to thank the academics, our teachers as my only point was to convey the fact that an all area, a whole discipline were disappearing from the English speaker higher education, and never appeared in other languages at it is a discipline name after globalization. I have been told that quite frankly they did not know that I was talking about, thus being surely caused by a problem of clarity and expression.

Human Rights (h.r)

And at the beginning of the year the dean was all too joyful to announce business (every one in uk is in business and admin, did you see?) taking over the beyond mired human rights medusaed raft.

“Professor Paul O’Prey, vice-chancellor at Roehampton University, had a 21 per cent pay rise to £218,000, (now on £246,000) as well the ‘tax-free benefit’ of a home.” (Daily Mail) We should have unit, your site has been a model of disorganization.

Read and read, people were reading reading, what had been done. Nothing, not a single action. We will, we will, we will, not a single report, conclusion, warning, resume, nothing.

But it makes sense though human rights is being scrapped that means that jobs related too. It is a coup that you were enacting. We take the subject we pass for a work group, with little titles and so and son.

We do make believe that the subjects is fought for, etc, while we are condemning after ignoring any kind of effort. Hacking, jelly mandering, obscurantism, cheap  insolence = to say oneself the boss and darwf any way people want to participate in by doing nothing while monopolizing the reins, ok…

in the library building all in marble replacing nothing that perfectly functioning one.

viva the old building industry! i d b curious enough to check which mps or civil servant, inter alia, by the same process have their own houses in renovation, actually.

About the students having started a campaign that no one wanted to let know by the public, as it would have taken real work, but what they did is launching a site, whose bureau was an office of strict members impeaching other decision-makers or team leader or parallel thinking to enter what was supposed to be a fight (the last resort fight). Their actions? Looking for support from famous grand professionals (looking for contacts and entering organisations), in drawing a petition that is in fact praising their universities instead of combating the fact this university draw to their leaders, millions of pounds that were supposed to be dedicated to human rights- among a glass brand new building of 4 floors that from the beginning were not used by human rights or agencies or researchers or students, no human rights inside but two spared  rooms and scattered tutorials) while these same leaders, academics, share-holders, were knowing that human rights as a speciality were to be scrapped and would last no longer than 6 odd years.

At these students that saw their speciality knocked down on her knees without reacting even a little but for concealing the importance of what was happening.

No more human rights at the university level, should have become a national matter. We were 50 students or so, 4 full time profs, and a dozen others mixed with other speciality. It never came out of a play-acting petition and all the fuss in the formality that discussion should take and stay.

On profs, academic of human rights, doing nothing, at least they could have launch a campaign of information, at least an article in a journal, informing the post cold war population about human rights execution, without even having to accuse their employers to nick with grandiloquence, not grams but tons of the last instance.

On the council of the university scrapping h.r and giving delay on discussion like if they were something to say. H.r and matters don’t derive from the need for human development and higher instance no longer but on the book mad makers that will tell you what you need, what you get, how do you do, and how you do, in order to survive till die from lust or then vain labor.

I think it is Weber, who explained that administrative power detain a huge power-  possibly tenfold those of the political power- by inertia, stubbornness, refusal to co-operate, counter-productivity, neglect…j en passe et des meilleurs , there is no wonder why horrors and worse than horrors, occurrences and recurrences to which you cannot give a name, hell forbids-how can one authorize that?, went and went in the past and are here rejoicing in our everyday- tasks.

And at the beginning of the year the dean was all too joyful to announce business (every one in uk is in business and admin, did you see?) taking over the beyond mired human rights medusaed raft.

On the site of the students being anti democratic as such as professing lies and discarding other considerations that whose of a self appointed committee.

A simple, simple, basic test on democracy.

We are told that there is no other options, that there is no more students, which is not true, and anyhow, who are these manager enough incompetent for failing to promote human rights, in high schools. And you will send your child learn sociology out of this dictatorial mentality.

It is not a university – guardian of the knowledge that has to be stored, helped, dissiminate, guardian herself of the people, creatures and matters from whom that all thought comes out.

Because let’s go back to Plato, well before the ‘’Christianity area’’, what was he adamant about, ce pion la?

He talked about the duties of the civil servants to defend with all their heart, intelligence, and energy, the field and the humanist purpose of the field or function they have been given the honour of being entrusted with.

Cf: Socrates, poison, academy.

But let’s talk about trust, this word, so much cheered by the stake-holders.

Because do we really know the staff, state and civil society around the concept of human rights, and in this case its study. Are they entrepreneurs, stake holders, servants or owners, do you get that?

How come people very seemingly in charge with the department of H.R ( i made the point that H.R were already treated as a scarcity, don’t I?) don’t convey you, me, our proofs, ropes, roofs and fproof,  the other profs, the other students, the opinion public, maybe, by a simple invitation?

Why can’t we discuss this subject? More than a subject, this palpable reality.

Because they are afraid, they don’t want to melt, they don’t want supervision, they don’t want clarity, what they want is simplicity- simplification and awe, Laura, for the Duschene re-mark, thank you.

And when you recall the head of sociology and human rights insisting on the fact that the only human rights are freedom of expression, (denigrating rights as justice, share, redistribution, right to peace and life, right to a living a prospering environment for humans and other species…) while his own department will have to watch the finitude of their specialities without been able to utter a world or if not you loose your seats and chairs, mes petits.

hey i said big bugger, not big fucker. Gutter?

it is in rereading save hr that reminded me that your sense of humour could be limited though. this campaign did not deserve to be name more than a joke don’t think? Don’t e.

I hear that the new residents of the Duchesne building, which used to house Crucible, will be the postgrad/research team from the Business School. Good people, and good offices. May I wish you all the best in those fantastic spaces. I do hope someone acknowledges that CETL capital funding was diverted from a Southlands extension to rescue the rebuilding of the old Mandela bulding to create Duchesne. So the University has benified from the CETL money and should acknowledge this somehow.

May I also use this space to congratulate the Business School on its six new staff and 1.7 million commitment at a time when good, hard workng scholars in the humanities and social sciences are facing redundancies.

Now, I talk to the interested directly, I came from the very first day, am law-abiding, not a total wreck, maybe.

I was here the first day of the college presentation, in this fantastic lecture room without tables.

It is a bit difficult for the mature student to stay focus in this condition, I work uniquely with my back and for longer that I thought would be, derision.

You talk(ed) a lot about business, ce jour-ci.

Human rights is right your business too, is it?

I calm myself each time hearing the name of business, thinking there is fair trade, t inquiete pas.

Because without human rights, the true ones, the noble, the ones that are to the service of individuals, their protectors-actions and the whole living universe, to the service of and served by any; because without human rights the business baby would be all and crooky.

Crooky, our baby?

I am homo, and when someone say to me that heteros are the ones fit for bringing up children, the answer is that one could retrieved the heirs from the tip of the rubbish or the trip of made famine and thief fifa family where she/he is left- but no, no possible there is health and safety.

I know the state of our toilets, the marble replacing the brand new ones already.

The state of your desk I guess it.

Please go vomit or cry in the nature please, as for primary, zero emission fertilizer, as recycling is still pollution, justement.

Consider the environment.

On student congratulating themselves:

i say you can try till you are blue in the face, but my friend have you tried of the ones you are so intimately linking with, what do you imply that they half have tried really? too nice of you this patently.

On fees raising.

hi, i think you might forget the new toilets (still without opening windows- mind if you breathe deeply in London street, your flesh will be chemically hurt and stop rapidly-maybe are we preserved from the fresh air, we could attempt to ask actually) in the library building all in marble replacing nothing that perfectly functioning one.

viva the old building industry! i d b curious enough to check which mps or civil servant, inter alia, by the same process have their own houses in renovation, actually.

 

Student knew, they had been warned that their classes were the last one in the whole uk and English speaking countries, that instead of the one stuff they did in the campaign (pain) they launch a petition,

About the students having started a campaign that no one wanted to let know by the public, as it would have taken real work, but what they did is launching a site, whose bureau was an office of strict members impeaching other decision-makers or team leader or parallel thinking to enter what was supposed to be a fight (the last resort fight). Their actions? Looking for support from famous grand professionals (looking for contacts and entering organisations), in drawing a petition that is in fact praising their universities instead of combating the fact this university draw to their leaders, millions of pounds that were supposed to be dedicated to human rights- among a glass brand new building of 4 floors that from the beginning were not used by human rights or agencies or researchers or students, no human rights inside but two spared  rooms and scattered tutorials) while these same leaders, academics, share-holders, were knowing that human rights as a speciality were to be scrapped and would last no longer than 6 odd years.

At these students that saw their speciality knocked down on her knees without reacting even a little but for concealing the importance of what was happening.

No more human rights at the university level, should have become a national matter. We were 50 students or so, 4 full time profs, and a dozen others mixed with other speciality. It never came out of a play-acting petition and all the fuss in the formality that discussion should take and stay.

On your petition I admit I could have been start of a strategy starring roehampton as a center of excellence, as it is so tiny but minute, but the sole on the land uk.

But not to mention that it was the only left, after this subject as been asked and asked again to appear in your theme. For you to refuse to do it and thus ruining any chances for being taken seriously. I am not old enough perhaps to grasp your motives entirely.

On profs, academic of human rights, doing nothing, at least they could have launch a campaign of information, at least an article in a journal, informing the post cold war population about human rights execution, without even having to accuse their employers to nick with grandiloquence, not grams but tons of the last instance.

On the council of the university scrapping h.r and giving delay on discussion like if they were something to say. H.r and matters don’t derive from the need for human development and higher instance no longer but on the book mad makers that will tell you what you need, what you get, how do you do, and how you do, in order to survive till die from lust or then vain labor.

I d like here (to) ask a question, to all of you.

It is about the aim of these courses, there are about human rights, mmh?

Human rights are also about democracy, it is not about the dictactorship of the majority the subject ici.

There are human rights and they are their defenders. Who are you?

I mean we risk the department closure, and there is even not a meeting.

I am not talking to the students but their professors.

What is going happen during ‘the judgment’, the kangaroo more, between the admin and you? Behind the curtain? Is it clear, cette foie-ci?

i am talking to you, you keep on posting political engagement rhetoric but you see here apparently, at least on what we could have, or that could have a counter-power precisely, it is more to do with an administrative matter.

I think it is Weber, who explained that administrative power detain a huge power-  possibly tenfold those of the political power- by inertia, stubbornness, refusal to co-operate, counter-productivity, neglect…j en passe et des meilleurs , there is no wonder why horrors and worse than horrors, occurrences and recurrences to which you cannot give a name, hell forbids-how can one authorize that?, went and went in the past and are here rejoicing in our everyday- tasks.

There is no too much problem understanding why they go on, and it is not all the fault of the guys with the same job as Obama’s.

Let’s talk about admin, now. You know after the full cooperation of the French with Hitler’s views, after the second WW, one started having their go at them. But not too much because with the cold war, there were another race, an economic one, la productivite. And the ex collaborators the one with the speculative money.

What did Laura say, they boost the economy. Artificially. You think that it is in line with the Human Rights, vraiment, really?

Let’s not be too ambitious, for a beginning, will you?

On the sole moves done when announcement of the subjects’ condemnation, was a meeting telling the students that university will be providing for them till the end of their year of study, gracefully.

And at the beginning of the year the dean was all too joyful to announce business (every one in uk is in business and admin, did you see?) taking over the beyond mired human rights medusaed raft.

On the site of the students being anti democratic as such as professing lies and discarding other considerations that whose of a self appointed committee.

A simple, simple, basic test on democracy.

We are told that there is no other options, that there is no more students, which is not true, and anyhow, who are these manager enough incompetent for failing to promote human rights, in high schools. And you will send your child learn sociology out of this dictatorial mentality.

Don’t you think that it is dubious, (is it politically correct?) Let’s say procedural, the due process of Law, ca ira.

Let’s keep track of the question:

There is no a single meeting, yes the principal of the southlands college, dropping her line, may no.

Yes, it would be enough for you, me and the others, everyone to loose their job, as soon as we question that.

It is not a university – guardian of the knowledge that has to be stored, helped, dissiminate, guardian herself of the people, creatures and matters from whom that all thought comes out.

Because how to question? On this website? Na.

It is on their faces, that we could try to arrange all that. Jurisprudence, keep it in mind, this and the fact that one should give their souls for the vast question as much as the ones treated, put down as being littler. On cleaning jobs. (in fact it is an attempt at killing the fundamental importance on how people clean let’s say- letting people using liters of chemical poisons, just to say, you will do it like dummies, your work is shit anyway. This mean that instead of having the honour of cleansing for the community to meet (like Gandhi) and do it against a  valuable, honourable, healthy share, One is obliged to do it in poisoning themselves and the future generations, like bandits, worst than highway daylight ruffian.

But did you notice, can you ask these people, what is going to happen precisely?

Because let’s go back to Plato, well before the ‘’Christianity area’’, what was he adamant about, ce pion la?

He talked about the duties of the civil servants to defend with all their heart, intelligence, and energy, the field and the humanist purpose of the field or function they have been given the honour of being entrusted with.

Cf: Socrates, poison, academy.

But let’s talk about trust, this word, so much cheered by the stake-holders.

Because do we really know the staff, state and civil society around the concept of human rights, and in this case its study. Are they entrepreneurs, stake holders, servants or owners, do you get that?

How come people very seemingly in charge with the department of H.R ( i made the point that H.R were already treated as a scarcity, don’t I?) don’t convey you, me, our proofs, ropes, roofs and fproof,  the other profs, the other students, the opinion public, maybe, by a simple invitation?

Why can’t we discuss this subject? More than a subject, this palpable reality.

Because they are afraid, they don’t want to melt, they don’t want supervision, they don’t want clarity, what they want is simplicity- simplification and awe, Laura, for the Duschene re-mark, thank you.

And when you recall the head of sociology and human rights insisting on the fact the only human rights are freedom of expression, (denigrating rights as justice, share, redistribution, right to peace and life, right to a living a prospering environment for humans and other species…) while his own department will have to watch the finitude of their specialities without been able to utter a world or if not you loose your seats and chairs, mes petits.

Now, I talk to the interested directly, I came from the very first day, am law-abiding, not a total wreck, maybe.

I was here the first day of the college presentation, in this fantastic lecture room without tables.

It is a bit difficult for the mature student to stay focus in this condition, I work uniquely with my back and for longer that I thought would be, derision.

You talk(ed) a lot about business, ce jour-ci.

Human rights is right your business too, is it?

I calm myself each time hearing the name of business, thinking there is fair trade, t inquiete pas.

Because without human rights, the true ones, the noble, the ones that are to the service of individuals, their protectors-actions and the whole living universe, to the service of and served by any; because without human rights the business baby would be all and crooky.

Crooky, our baby?

I am homo, and when someone say to me that heteros are the ones fit for bringing up children, the answer is that one could retrieved the heirs from the tip of the rubbish or the trip of made famine and thief fifa family where she/he is left- but no, no possible there is health and safety.

I know the state of our toilets, the marble replacing the brand new ones already.

The state of your desk I guess it.

Please go vomit or cry in the nature please, as for primary, zero emission fertilizer, as recycling is still pollution, justement.

Consider the environment.

Ps: a brief on intellectual property i won’ t reclaim any copyrights, or just the one of a occasional multitask in turn secretary, observer, student- an healthy living and healthy working condition – Democracy and HR truly, because like it is always the case for creativity, these are the ideas passed on me by someone I know. Ideas passed on the air of the dramatic scenes that are, by our buildings and hypocrisy, veiled so cosy.

This was a subject on: a democratic, open, accountable, transparent meeting on the why of this scarcity and repression on human rights university, could be, any?

Case study.

I hear that the new residents of the Duchesne building, which used to house Crucible, will be the postgrad/research team from the Business School. Good people, and good offices. May I wish you all the best in those fantastic spaces. I do hope someone acknowledges that CETL capital funding was diverted from a Southlands extension to rescue the rebuilding of the old Mandela bulding to create Duchesne. So the University has benified from the CETL money and should acknowledge this somehow.

May I also use this space to congratulate the Business School on its six new staff and 1.7 million commitment at a time when good, hard working scholars in the humanities and social sciences are facing redundancies.

as far as i am concerned i am the one that have been censured for having said that no one wanted to admit that human rights were scrapped nationaly and not only locally. also the campaign (pain) could have become tough and long sighting and long enduring. but the “were to have campaigned”camping had rather shushed it, go one praising the mausoleum roehampton. i am so sorry to say that having been censured by the very bureaucracy of human rights, by your students, whose professors have let, without reacting if not relieved, or perhaps amused, of course it is somewhat easy to teach 20 odds without making them understand that it is not because that they enrolled human rights that they are becoming the justs, suddenly, perhaps could they thus learn the only way to change the society as well as one’s one position to destiny, mainly to be fair ad bellum and in belly. When you realize that a bunch of human rights students decide to get rid of many people (first the alternative parties, after the people that don’t speak their way in order to put on their cv that they have run a campaign that they know could not be a runner…) ready to warn the population about what was going on, get rid of these people in order to seem, to appear to be the orchestrator of the stories. That these people claim to fight for philo and arts, and cannot take a little bit of additional data- aside their reordering recorded (laudatory men try on the same petition)  commendation and admiration to their potential employers in branding that what might be the worse of anti human rights (them), to advertise for it in doing the opposite. What is an office practicing redundancies of force aiming at pose and expand human rights issues, problematic and along side though their innate antidote? It is why people does not want to hear about human rights any longer, as people does not want to have to pay allegiance and support to an office, a bureau clamming defence of human rights- and the power of the legimity that those are conferring- while being their enemies and by extension enemies of human dignity, raison and liberty.

These “human rights screwers” are the one why people have given up or are against or like it should have been will have to counter.

On the students’ petitions just listing the advertising that roehampton university did a propos the human rights section, lying publicity by the way just parroted by students signing a petition or at least writing it in being the one perfectly knowing that they were “polls hope prey”.

On human rights victims of secular seclusion.  Secessionist not between slavery pro or anti, as or there is no rights or the rights to prey on penury.

A waste of time again, I can see from there the big smile of salaries doers.

Ps:

i ll have to thank you sincerely for this, honey. Find your action on action stuff, don’t be leave thinking that these guys need much convincing. It is a time war also, they could well be paid to the postponment of deeds and leads.

On the students chasing a political groups wanting to let the population know about human rights endangered. They chase them, the so well mannered and bred student of this so well kept and quiet, on no evening booze, bouse. They chase them out of their still born pretense of campaign that would have drawn them salaries if they have been able to do it for it, fake.

  • Hi, boyz,
    You were claiming of not wanting to do an aggressive campaign. I hope you were talking about the guys that went and react to the save the human rights issues.
    Who were they? Did you quite appreciate the fact that people took time to support these issues?
    No, because at the students meeting, what you said is that the management were against your starting a ‘campaign’ (a campaign is a war term, soit dit en passant), that they had destroyed the banners with the security guards…every one was very distraught about that.
    And at the meeting with the management – exactly 4 hours later- you suddenly became very assertive about your not wanting these guys come into the story, saying this time that they were the source of violence.
    May we know what happens exactly?I did not know quiet to believe.Hey, sweet hearts, about campaigning, it is again (no, it is still) a Roehampton speciality.
    It is one of the very ‘arms’ that these people want us to give up for the profit of more laissez-faire, or better laissez aller. (meaning next time is on you the security guard, even if the only of your instruments are loose ‘polite’ letter.You said, let’s wait what the ‘the board binning it’ ’s reactions will be.
    I agreed with you, i thought that the existence of human rights curriculum- the right word thank you to the person who used it- were somewhat linked with the national decision-making- whence the possibility of waging a campaign and say something like ‘protection, promoting, peace and social stability’ ‘national vocational qualification??’ i don’t know something.

    By the way, how much correct and empathising do you desire to remain. We are actually trying to defend their own baby from subjection?

Top of Form

about 6 months ago ·LikeUnlike · ·SubscribeUnsubscribe

Write a comment…

Press Shift+Enter to start a new line.

Bottom of Form

Chris Bond

For a more objective view of today’s protest including the occupation see our very own Nina Power’s (Senior Lecturer in Philosophy) article in the Guardian. Whilst violence should not be condoned history shows that when those in power become so arrogant to those they represent then people will rise up and take direct action. On a positive note it was excellent to see tens of thousands of students and staff campaigning together against this heinous attack on our education system. Well done to RU students for turning out in such a large number!!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/nov/10/student-protests-conservative-party-hq-occupation

Student protests: we are all in this together | Nina Power | Comment is free | The Guardian

www.guardian.co.uk

Nina Power: The occupation of Conservative party HQ is about so much more than fees. At last the country is beginning to fight back

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

might i remind you when this compain ended?

more or less when you started firing people over your cv buildings.

from the start. Write a com

I ll remind you a old adage, certainly much more than our grannies’.

Don’t ever confound virginity and profundity, sacrosanctity, scarcity and purity.

Because the campaign you would be one of those, you the one that erected themselves bright enough for not answering critics to your campaign, not the roehampton one like it was claimed to be, not the let’s save human rights but your pridity, your campain that were doing nothing, that clause in insulting people that were asking and asking you again, but what shall we do? This way cannot be winning? What did you do apart of not answering no one concern and fire the person that start commenting on what you were doing? Because you know I just wanted a little bit of a play when after 10 essays I realize that not even a words would be address on your fabrication: the still born.

I knew the campaign was to be a failure, you don’t fight injustice with flowers to who will pay.

Don’t ever confound virginity and profundity, sacrosanctity, scarcity and purity.

Because the campaign you would be one of those you would still be campaigning darling.

On the student firing as they were feinging not encompassing the danger of executing a rarity.

No student of human rights is what I try to awake in them.

Well ieasy, without even been notified, I could not enter the group setting up by them, but deemed to represent the effort of human right fighting for human rights banned by the university.

Oh I would like to thank everybody to have been concern by the bend that the lexicon was taking. Making comments on how people might express themselves, being shocked that someone wanted to talk more – to use the way words were put to do one thing complaining about participation, any how no one wanted to organize but censor. You voice one concern stuff that you did not want to read, but to be expelling, judge the matter. You know I am older than you and you know what guys you offered to yourself since you manage to do nothing for this campaing, you only act was to expel the one that at the end just was amusing the rest in revealing that no one was at ti. We could have done something in laughing a little bit. But you had made one action there, was to reassemble, do a can-do gangaroo court and give you the self satisfaction of banning someone of internet grouping using one of the most saddening internet opportunities- dead accountability. You are anti human rights, you are anti democracy.

And for the desert, no one talked to me whereas we are in the same building.

Go on writing, if I had a wish is for the ones that did not perceived it to be a grand comedy because of being unexperienced, and for those who pretend I ll tell you like in the 50’s. Shame, with one comment on it. Shame do kill… if not used to refrain liar, manipulator and greedy.

Ps: a lot of messages, as a fast typist I always slipped on entry, attacking a new message instead of continuing the liturgy.

Accused of profanity, as I was invoking pets’ name when it was too adamant that they would hear for the campaing against, solely the voice master, the dam same dame that promised us to be assassinate but deigning dinned if one would sign for her on lit = bad bed.

As for profanity, I hope you will be crying on this work on day.

We should have unit, your site has been a model of disorganization.

Read and read, people were reading reading, what had been done. Nothing, not a single action. We will, we will, we will, not a single report, conclusion, warning, resume, nothing.

But it makes sense though human rights is being scrapped that means that jobs related too. It is a coup that you were enacting. We take the subject we pass for a work group, with little titles and so and son.

We do make believe that the subjects is fought for, etc, while we are condemning after ignoring any kind of effort. Hacking, jelly mandering, obscurantism, cheap  insolence = to say oneself the boss and darwf any way people want to participate in by doing nothing while monopolizing the reins, ok…

It is a bit amazing to note how many skills might have a student, when they are but those. And it is not like I would not know how it happens, ti is not something you are unaware of, it is something you plan to do, reproducing the we won’t name philosophy and practicing. You are just whores. Talking about the bureau who did not make it talking about the one who did nothing talking about the ones who were complaining talking about me, k-rein and the ones Inner, the ones that would be under your chains, others, thinkers, human, that love. H.r.

Human rights by you is already taken by not business but crooks that hopeful won’t go indefinitely go hand in hand.

But finally that was nothing more than nothing, the campaign is dead like it deserved to be. Sharks playing offensed and cry baby.

So you, know when you understand that they are the same one playing boss in a whilst, bullying your mum and the sort, you start using bad words.

Great sensiblery of yours, while the last specialists class of the uk was scrapped before your not your eyes, but your used using yes.

 

It istyou say you can try till you are blue in the last noteface, but my friend have you tried of this campaign the great guyones you are so intimately linking with, what do you imply that think he will represent them all. After that adn woo washing twothey half have tried really? too nice of you this patently.

Response to the only person after dozens of messages later, the campain went stand still. If Ifro nothing proposing the team to unit and gather infromation about what have been tried to be done, and also to start a campaign of information at least thinkwithin our uni.

I would have like to think that they were just like me a banded imbecile, but not they were warned and no one can deny their reading and writing showing…also…

 

 

Hi Lindsey, i d like you to know that if i had not been banned from the site (sit et) for having insisted that it, eat, their only deed, the petition was a forgery persuasion of praise to the university that had been sold to the enemy, future human rights breaching industrially, instead of asking for good governance  of democracy. I would have helped you straight away i am sorry for not having been able to read you before. i also think that your proposal of at last stop monopolizing and hostageing the group supposed to lead something against or info to vex, of info to test, of info to bless, to make the issue know of at least other roehampton students and listing what had been done already of not an issue, but of our issues, of these minimum of 50 human rights students and their tutors modes, of fashion and models:  namely nothing, was the sole but great and appropriate idea of that has been, and still is as a remain of h.r dead, a waste of the time on student whinery and profs disability.

 

 

I could not resit, resist this is the last message of the campain. (came pain)

Sam

Hi everyone, good to see that the spamming problems and other problems experienced on monday have been resolved, this is looking like a proper campaign now 🙂 I Just thought i’d let you know that i’m your social sciences representative for the Student Senate (meeting with all the important people of the uni 😛 inc our vc). I think what your doing is excellent, and would like to get involved in any way I can. If you want to talk to me you can pm me….or email or

Vc= the guy that raise his sluraly as well as slavery. Salary and fees of the next to go bled.  May I also use this space to congratulate the Business School on its six new staff and 1.7 million commitment at a time when good, hard wor-king scholars in the humanities and social sciences are facing redundancies. Im sure many of them could teach business, if given the chance to do so once made redudant – AFTER THE CONSULTATION PROCESS!

C: and what if civil society is the way new age to reduce us to private gangs-e?

And the human rights only a misnomer? Name.

“Professor Paul O’Prey, vice-chancellor at Roehampton University, had a 21 per cent pay rise to £218,000, (now on £246,000) as well the ‘tax-free benefit’ of a home.” (Daily Mail)

However it is not because of being a sulbaterne of the board that the money more will be sudden loose use to your protection, belle?
from a university staff I think.
Where’s your commitment to access for the working classes to education now O’Prey. You spout about your “working class roots” at every opportunity – clearly you can be brought off too!!! £££££ Perhaps you should take a lesson from the honorable, ethical and committed first VC of RU Sister Dr Bernadette Porter who drew a salary of £103,000 and gave £100,000 of this to the Sacred Heart Order that she lived in, and lived on £3,000 a year. Why are you paid more than the VC of Kingston, Oxford Brookes and Leeds Met when they are triple the size of RU!!!! Why has RU just had to spend £2,000,000 on buying you a house to live in rent free in Putney!!! (Perhaps so you and Nick Clegg can share a Sherry at night – shame on both of you for turning blue!!!). We know about your spies reading this – Hi Christine and Michael!!! – Start being embarrassed when the requests for freedom of information about yours and the fat cats you’ve employed salaries and perks come in – oh and the fact the Director of Finance partner drafted the finance regs. Your corrupt regime won’t survive – no wonder Vince Cable doesn’t take you seriously when you screw more out of honest taxpayers than the PM!!!
The University should sell your “grace and favour” house that would mean we don’t need to close a course that is excellent and that you talk about non-stop when it suits you.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1259682/University-heads-given-pay-rises-28-cent.htm

University heads given pay rises of up to 28 per cent

www.dailymail.co.uk

Professors including Malcolm Grant of UCL had their salaries increased at the peak of the recession, and there have been further increases this year.

youruniversitythankyouverymuch

 

on the impossibility to know about the exact functioning of the funding. But still we ve got a vague hint of dismal dismissal autocracy administrative.

 

hi , look i don’ t know quite to whom i shall adress for this question, since you are the “on the ground” one…

i was wondering by what kind of system of funds the duschne building has been erected and sanctified a human rights building? by state funds? human rights allocation?

 

 

i am doing research about the funding of a building of human rights standing at roehampton university.

could you help me with these?

england helpline@equalityhumanrights.com

 

i contact the Higher Education Funding Council they told me it has probably been funded by more than a source. i contact the equality branch responsible for human rights funds they did not answer me yet.

i think i ll try to ask directly at roehampton office.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Historical materialism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

. It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness. At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or — this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms — with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. From forms of development, of the productive forces, these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an era of social revolution. The changes in the economic foundation lead, sooner or later, to the transformation of the whole, immense, superstructure.

In studying such transformations, it is always necessary to distinguish between the material transformation of the economic conditions of production, which can be determined with the precision of natural science, and the legal, political, religious, artistic, or philosophic — in short, ideological forms in which men become conscious of this conflict and fight it out.

In this section

Top of Form

SearchSearch:

Bottom of Form

News and events

Breadcrumbs

Cherie Booth QC opens the Duchesne Building

Story Posted: 23 November 2006

New state-of-the-art teaching facility

Cherie Booth QC opens the Duchesne Building and launches national Human Rights Centre at Roehampton University

Leading human rights lawyer Cherie Booth QC opened the Duchesne Building yesterday, a new state-of-the-art teaching facility that will house Crucible, the national centre of excellence for human rights education.

Addressing staff, students and friends of the University, Ms Booth said she was delighted to be part of such a significant step for human rights education.

Ms Booth spoke of the importance of human rights in society, drawing on headlines ripped from today’s news, such as the issues of childhood bullying and how early the notion of human rights should be introduced to children in a context they will understand.

Chancellor John Simpson echoed Ms Booth’s sentiments, recalling his own experience: “When I started out as a journalist, human rights was a code word we used for how the Soviet treated its people, and thought we were perfect. Things have changed.”

Mr Simpson said the Crucible project was a reflection of Roehampton University’s ability and passion for tackling complex, global issues.

Vice Chancellor Professor Paul O’Prey said the building was an integral element of Roehampton University’s new strategy for campus development.

“The Duchesne building is a wonderful environment for teaching, with the latest state of the art facilities. The quality of the student experience is at the top of our agenda and we are determined to give them the best possible environment in which to learn.”

The innovative space boasts a 150-seat lecture theatre, exhibition and reception space and 13 teaching rooms, with adaptable features and internet connectivity to accommodate a variety of cutting-edge teaching activities and methods.

Crucible is funded by a £4.5m grant from the government’s Higher Education Funding Council for England. The Centre works with a range of partners, including other universities, non-government organisations (NGOs), businesses and community groups.

Its innovative new courses include leading a European Masters degree in Human Rights Practice, funded by the European Commission under its prestigious Erasmus Mundus programme and delivered in collaboration with universities in Norway and Sweden.

The new building is named in honour of Rose-Phillipine Duchesne, educational pioneer and early founder of the Society of the Sacred Heart, which founded Roehampton University’s Digby Stuart College in 1874. Philippine Duchesne pioneered free education for Native Americans in the Mid-West in the early nineteenth century, teaching Potawatomi girls in a log cabin, in the most basic of conditions, at Sugar Creek, Kansas.

“With her spirit of adventure, her commitment to bringing education as a human right to all peoples of the world, no matter what their social or economic standing, Philippine would have been both amazed and delighted at what we are celebrating today,” said Professor O’Prey.

(The same guy that announces fees for lust higher education and human rights scrapping 5 years after while the guys saying we don’t have much is are raising its their own salaries.)

Firstly edited a letter to the head of SS social sickhences. Sciences. As our own chief of department judged h.r a minor affairs.

It has to be done as that academic as the head of the human rights department (and prof of democracy) and as the department was under ablation took the stance of saying that Human Rights (h.r) was a subsubject to sociology; whereas H.R is even not only a social sicence, silenced, but is a field that is as independent as it ought to be in interdependence with every other matters concerning humans, humanity and their consequential doings and activities.

He also said that humans rights surviving arts was only to be found in the first generation of rights (namely liberal rights = civil and political rights), also relegating all other rights (one example amongst thousands: the right of a sustainable economy, consumption and production) to non rights.

As a conclusion I d like to give you another idea:

Human rights students mounting a project that would have been thought as an expensive one, extensive one, to protect?? The ensured “”the right to euthanasia””.

With as a buttress to say that it was nice to abridge people distress.

I ll leave it to you, I wish I was the traitress.

But I, you ve, got the right to be euthanasiaed.

On overpopulation, on the old (that are not to be seen in the streets already as they are pushed away exactly like the bikes by the cars that no one came with the idea to fine when they almost twice a day almost run over one guy) and differently able stigma (who are left without job but with the certain future of being scrapped from the genetic tank of the new engeneering that form themselves thinking that mercy killing is the management of their positions and  situations’ great idea). Of the diseases in this spiritual world knowing but throuwing out, of the illness that will widespread as much as exterminated wildness has been.


cettevies is the site going hand to hand with inthenameofhumanrights.

it is more researched, literary and finished.

  inthenameofhumanrights is an agenda where every of my selections and writings go.

cettevies is my blog on my own creating writing only.

while cetvies is my book yet again completely different from any of my blog.

 

to come:

humanity laws concentrates on delimited and concrete topics.

whole universes rule: extranal quotations.

%d bloggers like this: